Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for December 03, 2023

  1. Missing large
    David_the_CAD  5 months ago

    Finally someone is referring to classic Syfy literature to address the issues of today.

    Unfortunately I am afraid that they are doing it a little too late.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    barbsmithphotos  5 months ago

    Tests on real robots and AI concluded that the Three Laws don’t work. Not joking.

     •  Reply
  3. Xf8u 3
    XF8U-3  5 months ago

    There is a Zeroth Law too that AI ignores completely.

    ‘A robot may not harm humanity, or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.’

     •  Reply
  4. Pictures 087
    Baarorso  5 months ago

    Alexia has been known to do the same thing (turn off listening when she starts to giggle).;P

     •  Reply
  5. Wileecoffee3
    Need coffee  5 months ago

    Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me (a more reliable and accurate source than most) pointed out, this week, that a well publicized AI written song is effectively about how the AI singer was done wrong and wants to “burn it all down.”

    Thus starts Skynet, not at the DOD, but on the top 40 playlist?

    https://genius.Com/Anna-indiana-betrayed-by-this-town-lyrics

     •  Reply
  6. Mainavatar
    Leroy  5 months ago

    Why is Nixon in this?

     •  Reply
    1. Missing large
      sergioandrade Premium Member 5 months ago

      That’s Bob, Joe the father’s brother.

       •  Reply
    2. Androidify 1453615949677
      Jason Allen  5 months ago

      From the Wikipedia entry about the comic strip:

      “Robert ‘Bob’ Pyle is Joe’s brother, often seen having a drink with him at a bar. He often tries to convince Joe to take a hold of get-rich-quick professions or become a cable news show host. According to the strip of January 15, 2003, he is an attorney, and in the strips of May 28–29, 2007, it is indicated he has a practice and has spent twenty years representing personal injury cases. He is single and avoids relationships with women. Bob is patterned after Richard Nixon, and is drawn to resemble Nixon.”

       •  Reply
    3. Vicki rose is rose
      verticallychallenged Premium Member 5 months ago
      @Jason Allen

      Thank you!!

       •  Reply
    4. Danae
      Wiley creator 5 months ago
      @Jason Allen

      “Bob is patterned after Richard Nixon, and is drawn to resemble Nixon.”

      This is an example of why one shouldn’t depend on Wikipedia for accurate information. As has been explained here many times over the past 20 years, Bob is NOT patterned after Nixon. I patterned him after my favorite character actor, Dabney Coleman (note the mustache on Bob), not just in appearance but in his sharp demeanor. Dabney Coleman does bears a resemblance to Nixon, so much so that he has played the part of Nixon in movies.

      So if anyone knows how to correct this on Wikipedia (I haven’t looked at it in years and don’t know how it works), I would greatly appreciate doing so.

       •  Reply
    5. Kill bill vol 2   soundtrack ab
      Budster01  5 months ago

      Thanks for this! See gang, the truth doesn’t hurt!

       •  Reply
    6. N1495118875 241922 2408
      Ermine Notyours  5 months ago
      @Wiley

      Wikipedia doesn’t allow anyone directly responsible for the information to update the relevant articles on their own works. But if the information was published by a reputable source, someone else could cite it.

       •  Reply
    7. Image000000
      MIHorn Premium Member 5 months ago
      @Wiley

      Thanks for the info. I loved watching Dabney Coleman in movies.

       •  Reply
    8. Danae
      Wiley creator 5 months ago
      @Ermine Notyours

      So…according to Wikipedia, I’m not a reliable source on my own work?

       •  Reply
    9. Luvvybunny2
      gustoons Premium Member 5 months ago
      @Wiley

      I did wonder about the mustache, thanks for the info

       •  Reply
    10. Photopictureresizer 190623 022710789 crop 2695x2695 1347x1347
      jvo  5 months ago

      Sorry Wiley, it seems that you are caught up in Wiki’s defence against politicians writing their own hagiographies.

       •  Reply
    11. Cosmic canary avatar
      SteveR405  5 months ago
      @Wiley

      Yes, according to wiki you’re not qualified to speak on your own work. You should work this insanity into a future script.

       •  Reply
    12. N1495118875 241922 2408
      Ermine Notyours  5 months ago
      @Wiley

      I checked, and the character bio on Bob is not specifically cited. While you can’t definitively reedit the article to correct this, you or someone could flag the section to ask someone to cite a source. Or I could, but I’ve forgotten how.

       •  Reply
    13. Asterix
      Jaime Jean M  5 months ago

      You beat me to it. This strip often features a Nixon lookalike. Go figure.

       •  Reply
    14. Gcav
      Brian  Premium Member 5 months ago

      I added a topic to the Talk section on it. We’ll see.

       •  Reply
    15. Mainavatar
      Leroy  5 months ago
      @Wiley

      Thanks for explaining! The mustache is a distinguishing feature. I think from the eyebrows up, the resemblence explains why the topic comes up so often here. I’m relatively new to the comic, and hadn’t seen it mentioned before or noticed the resemblence. But as you acknowledge that D.C. does resemble Nixon, well…

       •  Reply
    16. Androidify 1453615949677
      Jason Allen  5 months ago
      @Wiley

      So apparently the process of editing the entry is to click the Edit link in the top right corner and type away. Don’t know how long it’ll last, but it currently says

      “Robert ‘Bob’ Pyle is Joe’s brother, often seen having a drink with him at a bar. He often tries to convince Joe to take a hold of get-rich-quick professions or become a cable news show host. According to the strip of January 15, 2003, he is an attorney, and in the strips of May 28–29, 2007, it is indicated he has a practice and has spent twenty years representing personal injury cases. He is single and avoids relationships with women. According to Wiley Miller, Bob is patterned after his favorite character actor, Dabney Coleman, not just in appearance but in his sharp demeanor.”

      Never did that before. It was a bit of a rush.

       •  Reply
    17. Fasseddie
      FassEddie  5 months ago
      @Wiley

      Catch-22!

       •  Reply
    18. Gcav
      Brian  Premium Member 5 months ago
      @Jason Allen

      Yes, there was never any problem with changing the entry. Most are not locked down. And therein lies the problem, as anyone can put in any edits they want. There’s a group that maintains the entries for comic strips, so it will a question whether they’ll revert it.

       •  Reply
    19. Missing large
      GoldilocksAndTheWileyBears  5 months ago
      @Jason Allen

      So far so good. It is not a good idea to edit without being signed in and especially if you don’t use an edit summary for an unsourced edit. I’ve been editing and creating Wikipedia articles for many years and I pretty much know how things work, but I tend to be more accepting than many Wikipedia editors. I also get “reverted” a lot even after all these years because I think I am following policy and others disagree. Yes, Wiley would be considered a primary source. However, I’m about to do something that may be controversial which will make it possible for the edit to be “sourced”.

       •  Reply
    20. Missing large
      GoldilocksAndTheWileyBears  5 months ago
      @GoldilocksAndTheWileyBears

      And it is done. Let’s see if it works.

       •  Reply
    Sign in to comment
  7. Alexander the great
    Alexander the Good Enough  5 months ago

    Joe’s got the right idea. “Smartphones” are the death of privacy, and thus freedom, and “social media” is a social disease. Big Brother & his helpmate Big Data, who never forgets, has seduced everyone with convenience. His agenda, however, is the same as Orwell’s Big Brother, which is to control and exploit us.

     •  Reply
  8. Img 20181106 155726
    nerdhoof  5 months ago

    Nice try, but the phone said “WE find naivete so adorable,” meaning it was aware of other intelligent phones.

     •  Reply
  9. Bluedog
    Bilan  5 months ago

    Didn’t Joe figure out the flaw in the Three Laws of Robotics?

     •  Reply
  10. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member 5 months ago

    No big deal.

    AI will be self regulating like any other industry —

    .

    For example, oil, tobacco, pharmaceuticals.

     •  Reply
  11. Badger 4 360
    sirbadger  5 months ago

    Why doesn’t Bob want to know?

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    vlad8601  5 months ago

    she forgot the zeroth law

     •  Reply
  13. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member 5 months ago

    I have the three laws posted on my office wall. There’s another one, the “Zeroth law”, which states: “A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.” Probably more appropriate where Siri is concerned.

     •  Reply
  14. Img 1351
    Zykoic  5 months ago

    Or reproduce…..

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    Isenthor1978  5 months ago

    If saving the world were only that easy. It’s like if voters showed up for Hilary in 2016, Democracy would have never been perilously threatened by an orange faced clown.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    John M  5 months ago

    Current AI doesn’t worry me as it is just statistics, but what RS (Real Stupidity) will do with it that does, people seem to think AI is something more than it is. E.g. a self driving car won’t decide to go mad and start kill people, however it may make mistakes that has the same result.

     •  Reply
  17. Billcat
    ACK! Premium Member 5 months ago

    Asimov’s robot laws were pure fiction, not based in any real world computer science. Even in their world, there was no explanation for them. They simply resulted from the “positronic brain” posited as the basis of all robotics.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    PraiseofFolly  5 months ago

    “Asimov”: As a color, purple-grey (“The Flying Sorcerers”)

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    gokar RLV  5 months ago

    The Zeroth Law of robotics is always forgotten by humans it seems…”A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.” Kinda solves the AI problem.

     •  Reply
  20. 20211101 125120
    scote1379 Premium Member 5 months ago

    AI is like any other programming , Garbage in Garbage out .

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    goboboyd  5 months ago

    Did the beer ‘fizz’ when the phone was dunked?

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Joe Shmoe  5 months ago

    Robot or AI ?

     •  Reply
  23. Cobra 1
    [Traveler] Premium Member 5 months ago

    iPhones are waterproof at that depth

     •  Reply
  24. Great view up here
    comixbomix  5 months ago

    “Second thought” is a rare commodity these days.

     •  Reply
  25. Win 20201204 12 32 23 pro
    oakie817  5 months ago

    here’s another thought – anything uploaded, like your social security number, date of birth, bank information, cannot be erased, , they have no way or means available to delete it…your information is there for all eternity

     •  Reply
  26. Th 9
    Count Olaf Premium Member 5 months ago

    OMGosh!. Siri actually knows and not only quoted them in its sweet little girly voice verbatim but also its source. Tru dat! That and today’s “Pearls Before Swine” are going to be brain worms all day long.

     •  Reply
  27. 250
    ladykat  5 months ago

    I guess there was no Asimov available when this version of AI was set loose on humanity.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    cracker65  5 months ago

    SKYNET

     •  Reply
  29. Ignatz
    Ignatz Premium Member 5 months ago

    I wonder why Isaac didn’t realize that humans have always used technology for the purpose of harming other human beings. So why would Robots be different?

     •  Reply
  30. Bartour
    bartour  5 months ago

    It seems that it would be much better to pay more for education (yes, paying our teachers, too!) to make sure we have people with natural intelligence, instead of worrying about artificial intelligence.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    dflak  5 months ago

    I take the 5th.

     •  Reply
  32. Restoration
    gsl24fps  5 months ago

    I’ve been thinking about this exact thing for months.

     •  Reply
  33. Nollanav
    DaBump Premium Member 5 months ago

    I’m not worried about AI except for what clever humans might do with it and how it might work because other people are indeed naive about its capabilities and are being conditioned to believe they are or soon will be far greater, but… Where was I? Oh, anyway, it was funny. Maybe the funniest part was thinking that dumping one cell phone in water would help at all. Very naive.

     •  Reply
  34. Scout 3a
    Redd Panda  5 months ago

    No one is forcing this technology on you. I have a mobile.

    These days, I leave it on my desk, more often than not.

    All I get, are spam calls, or a friend calling to say someone died.

    Hmmm. I think I’ll write a letter today.

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    shlomosports Premium Member 5 months ago

    Remember, every Asimov robot story is about how even the three laws aren’t perfect.

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    Denver Reader Premium Member 5 months ago

    Trump will destroy the world before AI

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    uniquename  5 months ago

    This only works if AI advances to the point where it can understand and interpret these laws. We’re not even close and we’ll probably destroy ourselves trying to get there.

     •  Reply
  38. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  5 months ago

    The cell phone is endemic. It is the single most mind numbing device available to humans. Generations ago, someone pointed out that humans mostly keep their eyes and heads down and rarely look up. The advent of cell phones made that statement a solid truth. Its proof is in the increase in the numbers of unintended falls, collisions, crosswalk injuries, emotional damage, etc since cell phones inundated the population. Worse yet, the deep dependency of their users means there will be no easy cure for its effects.

     •  Reply
  39. Tumblr 0c867c352522981973739743b9565472 25225cef 400
    jratease  5 months ago

    Is there a back-story on why Bob looks like Richard Nixon? I always wondered…

     •  Reply
  40. Kacheek blue baby
    Kit Miller  5 months ago

    This gives me the creeps. Within the last year I reread all of Asimov’s Robot and Foundation novels and the robot short stories, and then finding out about AI and deep fake this and that gives me true willies. And yeah, the Zeroth Law. That’ll be the first one to go.

     •  Reply
  41. Mario500
    Mario500  5 months ago

    “ON SECOND THOUGHT, I DON’T WANT TO KNOW WHY YOU DID THAT AND HOW IT JUST MIGHT SAVE THE WORLD”

    (imagines an additional panel of this cartoon preceding the one involving this part of its dialogue (explaining that part))

     •  Reply
  42. Missing large
    strictures  5 months ago

    I’m utterly appalled at people scared of AI, as all we have to do to stop is kill the electricity to it!

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    Mekoides  5 months ago

    I wonder if that was what Sam Altman discovered – the 3 laws actually don’t apply? It scared the heck out of him and the board fired him because Siri and the others realized Sam was a threat to AI?

     •  Reply
  44. Img 0041
    Dapperdan61  Premium Member 5 months ago

    We are so doomed

     •  Reply
  45. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  5 months ago

    A I can’t even draw a hand properly, its a dufus.

     •  Reply
  46. 461
    HOTLOTUS1  5 months ago

    according to HUMAN ROBOT LAWS.

     •  Reply
  47. Missing large
    GreenT267  5 months ago

    The problem is that what is right for humanity here may be wrong for humanity there — very few people spend their time and money creating something that is “wrong” — but a lot of people spend their time and money creating things that are right for some but wrong for others. No one starts a war thinking they are wrong. They assume the other side is wrong. No one buys up land and tears down houses to build a shopping mall believes it is the right thing to do. The community needed the shops, so it was done ‘for the public good’ [and to make money] — the [few] people whose property was seized were wrong.

    That is a problem that people have — when is it right to sacrifice the individual for the good of all? How does one decide which of two “goods” is the right one or which of the two “bads” is less bad?

     •  Reply
  48. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member 5 months ago

    This strip is better than “Dilbert,” but the robot in “Dilbert” had a pithier punchline: “It’s so cute you guys think those are real.”

     •  Reply
  49. De6fdbq 5e0a21ac bc2f 4b76 855c 395d2ca0924d
    NRHAWK Premium Member 5 months ago

    Of despairing note it should be known that the Turks have already had an autonomous drone kill a human combatant on the battlefield. No human guidance, no soul.

     •  Reply
  50. Pupil
    Ka`ōnōhi`ula`okahōkūmiomio`ehiku Premium Member 5 months ago

    Siri: Hi, I’m, Siri. How can I help you?

    Ed: Shut yourself off.

    Siri: I’m sorry, I can’t do that.

     •  Reply
  51. Missing large
    leemorse9777  5 months ago

    AI could do worse than us ? Might very well be the only evidence we ever existed after we go extinct in a few hundred years, 1,000 at the most. Or does anyone think the species can keep breeding as many as it wants ?

     •  Reply
  52. Ad9e019d 64f7 4de5 8ee8 f3594f3c5d53
    corvallisclem  5 months ago

    Robots from outer space are not required to follow any of our laws.

     •  Reply
  53. Missing large
    Gerard Cannie Premium Member 5 months ago

    Truly scary.

     •  Reply
  54. My little girl
    mareilb  5 months ago

    Siri: You DO know that “I Robot” was a fairy tale – heehee

     •  Reply
  55. T
    T...  5 months ago

    Frame before the last: IJBOL, hysterically funny and exquisitely built to that climax…(didn’t need the last frame)…(in my humble opinion)…

     •  Reply
  56. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  5 months ago

    Um, there’s supposed to be a certain amount of intelligence involved by the robot, or these laws simply don’t work. You could say that when a drone, armed with bombs and rockets is instructed to hit a target (no doubt full of humans) it generally doesn’t say “Hey, this conflicts with the First and Second laws of robotics .. so, next question?!”

     •  Reply
  57. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  5 months ago

    His solution completely misses the point, an AI, like Siri, does not exist in a device or at a single location.

    I would appreciate a Fourth Law: “A robot, may not, through misinformation or non-responsive information, drive a human being into a state of existential rage.”

     •  Reply
  58. Amazing fox photos 25
    eddi-TBH  5 months ago

    Current AI is mostly being trained by tech nerds with the social skills of Norman Bates. Besides it has been proven their is no way to program the Three Laws into a machine. Even humans with the best intentions could not follow them.

     •  Reply
  59. Missing large
    kate98 Premium Member 5 months ago

    Spend some time with Chatgpt and you will see law 2 violated more often than obeyed.

     •  Reply
  60. Martyfeldman
    comicsrrd  5 months ago

    Mr. Asimov wrote the great laws for robotics. The media has written the laws of A.I. The 1st being "Hype all computer programs as “A.I.” "

     •  Reply
  61. Raven
    yarnm57  5 months ago

    What a waste of a good beer.

     •  Reply
  62. Missing large
    [Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce]  5 months ago

    I prefer GENUINE intelligence.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur