So far so good. It is not a good idea to edit without being signed in and especially if you don’t use an edit summary for an unsourced edit. I’ve been editing and creating Wikipedia articles for many years and I pretty much know how things work, but I tend to be more accepting than many Wikipedia editors. I also get “reverted” a lot even after all these years because I think I am following policy and others disagree. Yes, Wiley would be considered a primary source. However, I’m about to do something that may be controversial which will make it possible for the edit to be “sourced”.
And it is done. Let’s see if it works.