Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for December 31, 2019


Hide All Comments
  1. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    A difference without distinction.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    willispate  over 1 year ago

    either way, we’re screwballed.

     •  Reply
  3. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  over 1 year ago

    The world will end in decadence.

     •  Reply
  4. Peru monkey
    sirbadger  over 1 year ago

    NASA engineers figured that they could land a man on the moon by 1967. Then they told Kennedy “No, No, No, you can’t put that in a speech. You have to leave yourself wiggle room in case something goes wrong. Say end of decade.”

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    strictures  over 1 year ago

    I was reading comments on an article about the best of the decade & the annoying pedants that were complaining that the decade isn’t over for another year were out of control. Give it up already!

     •  Reply
  6. 45732a
    Sanspareil  over 1 year ago

    It’s reassuring to know that World’s End is in Berkshire England.,_Berkshire

     •  Reply
  7. Psx 20180717 164642
    Watcher  over 1 year ago

    Guy’s, the world will end when you 2 will meet.

     •  Reply
  8. 1628996 t1
    enigmamz  over 1 year ago

    As true as it is, not enough people give a crap – put a 0 on the end, and it’s new, period.

     •  Reply
  9. Picture
    RobinHull  over 1 year ago

    It seems to be a matter of common consent that the twentieth century consisted of only ninety-nine years. If we accept that, then the decade ends tonight. I’m an engineer, so I don’t accept it.

     •  Reply
  10. 8863814b f9b6 46ec 9f21 294d3e529c09
    mattro65  over 1 year ago

    In this corner we have the Vernacular Viper! In the other corner it’s the Professor of Pain! Are you ready to rumble?

     •  Reply
  11. Image
    richardzimdars  over 1 year ago

    Not even the so-called experts agree on when a decade ends. Some say it starts on Jan. 1, 2020, but some say it starts on Jan. 1, 2021 because there was no year zero.

     •  Reply
  12. Saw whet in hand
    khmo  over 1 year ago

    Wow, don’t know which pedants you meant #strictures but you sure did release the math nerds among us. Happy New Year.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    chmsam  over 1 year ago

    Let’s put it this easy way – start counting on your fingers. Where’s the finger that’s counted and ends with a zero? It isn’t the one you start with is it? If you don’t get that I’ll bet people show you another finger fairly often.

     •  Reply
  14. 7a3d35b05103496eecec311170ba260d
    Pickled Pete  over 1 year ago

    It is my hope all you folks come to a consensus on this matter, it’s really a matter of life and death.

     •  Reply
  15. Desron14
    Masterskrain Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The decade of the 20’s begins in 2020. Period.

     •  Reply
  16. Tor johnson
    William Bednar Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The beginning of a decade really depends on when you think the century began: either 2000 or 2001. If 2000, then the next decade begins on 2010, otherwise, 2011. The same for the next decades.

     •  Reply
  17. Photo
    Nate England  over 1 year ago

    Environmentalists at arms.

     •  Reply
  18. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The world does not end this year. A new era begins. The 20s!! Woo Hoo!!!!

     •  Reply
  19. Strega
    P51Strega  over 1 year ago

    Decade just means 10 years, it isn’t tied to history. “The decade” for me is the ten years where the number in the tens column is constant. I’m much younger than many of the other commenters, so I wasn’t around for year 1.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    thelordthygod666  over 1 year ago

    The teen decade does not end until 31 December 2020. However, since the masses has been ignoring the decade rule for over half a century, it’s time to redefine.

     •  Reply
  21. Halloween 20cat
    morningglory61 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    I’ve come to believe…only intelligent people enjoy the funny papers. For the most part anyway.

     •  Reply
  22. Piggy2
    Greyhame  over 1 year ago

    A bunch of vocal people are wrong. Therefore we must chance reality!

     •  Reply
  23. Img 20140309 081158
    Herb L 1954  over 1 year ago

    The beat goes on.The beat goes on ;)

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    Hoppman Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The good news is only the nutbag religious zealots believe the end is nigh, and of course they have been wrong thousands of times.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    nos.nevets  over 1 year ago

    If only we had had Arabic Numerals when Caesar Augustus’s decree went forth that all the world should be taxed.

    Zero ain’t nuttin’.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    retpost  over 1 year ago

    The use of computers made the year ending in “o” the start of a new century, as those of us that had a computer in 2000 should remember.

     •  Reply
  27. Mario500
    Mario500  over 1 year ago

    (believes the last years of decades for a certain calendar system often referenced as the “Gregorian calendar” ought to end with the number “9”)

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    ascha35-gocomics  over 1 year ago

    There is no such thing as time. There are only events.

     •  Reply
  29. Mbsils
    marilynnbyerly  over 1 year ago

    The CW ARROWVERSE “Crisis on Infinite Earths” has a really funny scene where a guy holding a “The End is Near” sign stares in horror as the wave of antimatter destruction destroys everything around him, then he goes to powder, too.

     •  Reply
  30. Xp patch jpeg crop
    jack666 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Allow me to recommend “Questioning the Millennium” by Stephen Jay Gould, subtitled “A Rationalist’s Guide to a Precisely Arbitrary Countdown”; written for the occasion of the start of the third millennium. Allow me also to point out that during what is known as the year one, precisely no one considered that year to be “the year one”. The calendar system in which that year is defined was developed a few hundred years later. Gould’s “resolution” of the millennial dispute, based on his autistic son’s day/date computing algorithm (which Gould deduced with much study) is an intriguing solution to a completely artificial dilemma.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    kapral  over 1 year ago

    The century starts on the one. The decade starts on the zero. as in the 20’s, the 30’s etc.

     •  Reply
  32. N1495118875 241922 2408
    Ermine Notyours  over 1 year ago

    The 40s, the 50s, the 60s; now those were decades. The idea that current decades have distinct identities went out with the idea of daily news cycles tied to newspaper printing schedules. Give or take a year, it doesn’t matter much.

     •  Reply
  33. Camera 1
    kathi_clayton  over 1 year ago

    How old are we when born?

     •  Reply
  34. Db1
    DetailBear  over 1 year ago

    It’s the end of the decade known as the 2010s just like 1999 was the end of the century known as the 1900s. It is not the end of the 202 decade of the Common Era until the end of 2020 (just like the 20th century ended in 2000), but who counts those? Anyone?

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    nikpromo  over 1 year ago

    Having read all of the above comments, I have only one (1) thing to say about this subject – January 1, 2020 is the start of the new decade; and hopefully, the clowns in Congress will regain their sanity; but I am not going to hold my breath waiting; ALL 535 OF THEM SHOULD BE PRIMARIED!!!!!!

     •  Reply
  36. Photo
    David Peters  over 1 year ago

    Year zero? That didn’t use “0” back then…

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    macaddicted  over 1 year ago

    Sure, as soon as there’s a calendar that starts with Year Zero. And we’re more like pendants, always hanging around.

     •  Reply
  38. Fef08a4fd6bdb1361b558581a5b88bb4
    kf6rro  over 1 year ago

    Did it ever occur to the people with those signs that some people might actually be happy if the world would just end already?

     •  Reply
  39. Crankyc
    franki_g  over 1 year ago

    so the 2020’s will NOT be the 3rd decade of this century but one year in the 2nd decade and 9 in the 3rd… Life’s complicated enough. If it starts with 202x, it’s in the decade.

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    STACEY MARSHALL Premium Member over 1 year ago

    A major source of confusion here is the different ways we number the years, and our ages. We number the year by the year we are in, aka this is the 2019th year we are in. The first 2020 years will not be complete until the end of the year 2020. How-so-whom-ever, we number our age by the number of years we have already completed. So if you were born in the year one, you would be zero years old. And in 2019, you would be 2018 years old, plus change. And you would be in your 2019th year. Perfectly simple, and perfectly annoying!

     •  Reply
  41. Egil skallagrimsson
    Kveldulf  over 1 year ago


    If anyone reading here has any input at NASA or SpaceX, ask them not to begin a Martian colony’s calendar with year 1 beginning on the date of landing.

    Instead, make the Martian years go from northern winter solstice to winter solstice and make landing day happen sometime in YEAR ZERO.

    (Don’t make Martians suffer the way we do.)

     •  Reply
  42. Fox spirit animal 3
    eddi_tbh  over 1 year ago

    They are still bitter about the whole 2000/2001 thing.

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    paullp Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Oh, come one. Didn’t we just fight this out in the Agnes comments a couple of days ago? Here we go again.

    Happy New Year! Hoping 2020 is a year of clear vision filled with insight!

     •  Reply
  44. Missing large
    jmcenanly  over 1 year ago

    20 years ago, there was a controversy as to whether the 21st century would begin after the last stroke of midnight of 1999 or 2000. Artur c. Clarke was a leading proponent of the latter, for obvious reasons.

     •  Reply
  45. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  over 1 year ago

    As a programmer, I know that the counting numbers start with 0. I bet nobody thinks this century started in 2001. Intervals start as soon as the next larger wheel on the odometer clicks over. (and how many of y’all have to dredge through an old memory to picture that?).

     •  Reply
  46. Toughcat
    bakana  over 1 year ago

    It all depends on whether you believe Haysus was born in Year Zero or Year One.

     •  Reply
  47. Danae
    Wiley creator over 1 year ago


     •  Reply
  48. Missing large
    bagjr64  over 1 year ago

    Good one.I always start with when my kids were young there were a month six months… Not a year and x months. BUT year 0 has been moved around, who cares about the calendar on the wall

     •  Reply
  49. 1e22ce3e310c2d28a093fd26faa89719
    The Pro from Dover  over 1 year ago

    I’m with, and I don’t want to politicize this, the profit on the right. Ugh.

     •  Reply
  50. Bbb
    NeoconMan  over 1 year ago

    I’m ok with not teaching math or science in high school. Best way I know to get them to vote Republican.

     •  Reply
  51. Shout avatar
    vanaals  over 1 year ago

    “The year zero does not exist in the Anno Domini (AD) system commonly used to number years in the Gregorian calendar and in its predecessor, the Julian calendar. In this system, [determined by Bede in 731] the year 1 BC is followed by AD 1.However, there is a year zero in astronomical year numbering (where it coincides with the Julian year 1 BC) and in ISO 8601:2004 (where it coincides with the Gregorian year 1 BC), as well as in all Buddhist and Hindu calendars.”

     •  Reply
  52. Twblob
    SrTechWriter  over 1 year ago

    Correct. Bede was wrong in 731, and his error has been propagated by absolutists who can not (or refuse to) understand how the base-ten numeric system works. That does not make it right, or a valid argument. Besides, Bede was guessing about the dating system. He subscribed to the same error that says that 10 is the tenth count in the decimal system. It’s not, it’s the eleventh, because counting starts with zero, not 1. Enumerating starts with 1, and is not the same thing. Just because he was a cleric, everyone assumed he was infallible, which was stupid because he was Human.

     •  Reply
  53. Photo
    David Peters  over 1 year ago

    Can I put this “date” thing into perspective: When a child is born is it one year or is it in it’s 1st year, by weeks or months?BC to AD had no mid point and AD started at one plus days, weeks and months.Don’t forget the missing days when the Pope Gregory calender started…

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment