Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for July 15, 2021

  1. Photo
    EasternWoods  almost 3 years ago

    Knowledge of another kind

    Why social distancing is important is kind of an abstract concept. I try to explain how virol load changes with distance. My daughter had a better explanation. She calls it " fart smell radius "

     •  Reply
  2. Egil skallagrimsson
    Kveldulf  almost 3 years ago

    There is one teensy little problem with the gold standard — while numerous gold mines operate around the world, their output is barely enough to keep up with the worldwide demand for jewellery. Add in gold’s usage in electronics, satellite shielding, and other little known but essential industrial processes, and there just isn’t enough left over to back up the world’s largest economic system.

     •  Reply
  3. Bluedog
    Bilan  almost 3 years ago

    We ARE still on the gold standard. The guys that have the gold make the rules.

     •  Reply
  4. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  almost 3 years ago

    Bob has underestimated the public’s thirst for ignorance.

     •  Reply
  5. Sherlock holmes gillette chose the pipe and deerstalker because they could be seen easily in the theater
    WGillete  almost 3 years ago

    Some people just can’t leave the 19th century.

     •  Reply
  6. Noodleman 2  2
    Cornelius Noodleman  almost 3 years ago

    I think I’ll stand over here.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Doug K  almost 3 years ago

    He should have charged (more for) admission/consultation.

     •  Reply
  8. New badger avatar
    tudza Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Maybe, but don’t start any wars you can’t afford. Also, watch that emergency spending.

     •  Reply
  9. Tampa 2010 033
    mikeyman  almost 3 years ago

    Must be before TED talks.

     •  Reply
  10. Profile 6
    dot-the-I  almost 3 years ago

    Obviously, “Location, location, location" is not in his purview.

     •  Reply
  11. Photo
    VincentGoudreault  almost 3 years ago

    Of course we should. But the banks would never want it. With the gold standard, the value of the currency is locked with that of gold, ending (1) speculation on the precious metal and (2) essentially locking the price of anything away from inflation.And the reason banks would not like it is that it would be readily apparent that the current interest rates on deposits are negative when inflation adjusted, meaning that banks do not pay interest, but charge rental on money.

     •  Reply
  12. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  almost 3 years ago

    I’m sure he’s thought long and hard about this – a shame no-one seems to be interested.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    JohnCL  almost 3 years ago

    There are so many other possible topics that Bob might post.

     •  Reply
  14. Saint
    -Saint-  almost 3 years ago

    He’d have more people in line if he was giving away free samples…!

     •  Reply
  15. Image
    Lenavid  almost 3 years ago

    When I die, I want my last check to bounce.Check? I guess I’m stuck in the 20th Century.

     •  Reply
  16. Badger avatar
    Twelve Badgers in a Suit Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Nobody wants to hear ideas that would fùck the economy even more than it already is.

     •  Reply
  17. 05a762eb aaea 4e9f 8ff2 c6c8a7f85ba9
    kartis  almost 3 years ago

    At least it’s not Four Seasons Landscaping.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    bbenoit  almost 3 years ago

    Just like dollars, gold is only valuable, beyond it’s physical uses, because someone told us it is, and we believe it. Money, whatever it’s based on, is just tokens that represent wealth. A way to keep score and allow some to hoard more than the rest of us.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    1953Baby  almost 3 years ago

    NO! NO! PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE! I’LL DO ANYTHING! JUST . . .NO ECONOMICS!!!

     •  Reply
  20. Huckandfish
    Huckleberry Hiroshima  almost 3 years ago

    Well, Bob…… oh, never mind.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    rickseg  almost 3 years ago

    I read in a geology text some time ago that all the known gold in the world would make a cube 18 meters on a side. Not all that big. And that it was/is formed in the universe only when neutron stars happen to collide. So apparently there’s really not that much to go around, unlike the case of diamonds which are formed constantly in the earth’s mantle and can be made in the lab from carbon. Those are only valuable because of strict control by a cartel.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    david_42  almost 3 years ago

    There’s about $10 Trillion in gold available compared to 19 Trillion USD in circulation and $46T in the US stock market alone. Ready for a serious adjustment of the world economy?

     •  Reply
  23. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Just add the “signature” of Q on the bottom of that sign. That’ll get their attention.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    david_42  almost 3 years ago

    The US left the gold standard in 1971. USD in circulation: $19T, world stocks: $95T. Mined gold: $10T It could get ugly.

     •  Reply
  25. Michaelparksjimbronson
    well-i-never  almost 3 years ago

    This is why the world has switched to the Bitcoin standard. That and ransomware.

     •  Reply
  26. Braveheart
    Free or Not? Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Well, We SHOULD go back on the gold standard. Much better than fiat currency.

     •  Reply
  27. Race bannon
    scottbruce  almost 3 years ago

    Bob must be in DC. Politicians don’t want to be controlled by any standard.

     •  Reply
  28. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Bob’s knowledge might be more highly regarded if he knew how to set up the stanchions for a proper waiting line.

     •  Reply
  29. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  almost 3 years ago

    You have to call it crypto-gold and tell people it’s backed by massive expenditures of power for tedious calculations.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    BigEd  almost 3 years ago

    I don’t think we have that much Gold on earth to cover what we are in debt for and the Democrats keep wanting to spend more and send prices up even more.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    micromos  almost 3 years ago

    Shhh, the Democrats may be reading this.

     •  Reply
  32. N1495118875 241922 2408
    Ermine Notyours  almost 3 years ago

    I had to work with someone who insisted on talking about going back to the gold standard while we were standing around waiting for work. I’m not sure which level of Hell that is.

     •  Reply
  33. Img 0306
    Vangoghdog01  almost 3 years ago

    Please, stop printing unbacked money.

    Back our money with any objective standard of worth

     •  Reply
  34. Hat large square
    Cactus-Pete  almost 3 years ago

    Is the joke about the gold standard or about how no one ever disseminates information in that manner? It doesn’t work with both.

     •  Reply
  35. Spooky
    unca jim  almost 3 years ago

    The only profit ever made by “REAL GOLD” is made by both sellers and buyers with ‘us’ in the middle as advertised in the back pages of AARP, Veterans Mags, etc. By the time a $95 investment is made buying a $100 gold piece, time passes until it’s listed as worth $105 bux, where it’s bought for $100 bux by a ‘coin dealer’ looking for a $5 buck profit and where’s the fun in THAT?? The only GOLD profit I’ve ever made in life was the discovery of a small sachet of California Gold from the 1800’s found in Grandpa’s old roll-top desk back in the ’50’s when we sold the farm.. Seems a bunch of relatives ‘went out west" in the 1850-70’s and brung home a few samples of their findings and gramps put it in a box along with a bunch of Silver Dollars of the era and so I keep it around to send on to ‘not my brightest’ generation who will somehow manage to get themselves screwed real goodly by the “Gold, Valuables and Silver Collectors” of that age.. >huge eye-roll<

     •  Reply
  36. Nomagram
    COL Crash  almost 3 years ago

    You know the old saying that you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.

    If you stake him down next to it, he’ll come around eventually.

     •  Reply
  37. Me 3 23 2020
    ChukLitl Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    The concept of a gold standard encourages hoarding so there can never be enough to keep an economy moving. If it’s not circulating it’s not money, it’s collectable scrap at best. If it doesn’t circulate to the bottom it gets scuzzy down there.

     •  Reply
  38. Tulips
    locake  almost 3 years ago

    Is Bob going to talk to people One at a Time? That seems very inefficient.

     •  Reply
  39. Aoh14gisjeel abqsrdlt92gtkysd1mqmzelqk lmh3cpg=s96 c
    KeithPixton1  almost 3 years ago

    Wouldn’t it be “Back to the gold standard”?

     •  Reply
  40. Pupil
    Ka`ōnōhi`ula`okahōkūmiomio`ehiku Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    The BLING Standard.

     •  Reply
  41. 345 the puss in boots 3
    Boots at the Boar Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    I think we should return to the cowry shell standard.

     •  Reply
  42. Avatarpic l  1
    mfrasca  almost 3 years ago

    Bitten by the Gold-Bug.

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    wndflower1  almost 3 years ago

    presently, the public has NO thirst for Any knowledge!!! GAAAH!!

     •  Reply
  44. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  almost 3 years ago

    Libertarians are hard for gold.

     •  Reply
  45. Toughcat
    bakana  almost 3 years ago

    The real problem with trying to go back on the gold Standard at this point in time is that we would need at least 10 times as much Gold as there is in the World to do it.

    And, that includes any gold that haven’t been dug out of the ground yet.

    The Money supply outgrew Gold, Platinum & Silver combined many years ago.

     •  Reply
  46. Stellers sea eagle japan 31794 100x75
    UpaCoCoCreek Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Ha! There were 139 commenters here who would’ve stood in line for Bob….

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur