Judges who call themselves “pro-life” issue rulings that allow churches to kill people by the tens of thousands. There is not a shred of Christian decency or morality in any of these hypocrites.
The current collection of Supremes believe (despite what they say, it DOES matter) that “freedom of religion” means that religions are special organizations that have all kinds of rights that normal ones don’t have. Including the magical property that people (and their organizations) can claim discriminatory behavior is “religious” and then, (if the Supremes agree that it’s a “true” religion) the discrimination is legal. So, if that’s the case, what’s a little manslaughter thrown into the mix?
Their imaginary being is supposedly omnipresent, but they have to clump together to get their indoctrination fix while risking theirs and other peoples lives. It shows how their beliefs are always on shaky ground.
OT but still a “fun” fact: McTrutle just decreed that in-person lunches for the republiKKKans will be no longer held “in-person” because of this Rona HOAX!!
Can we start taxing churches again. There is nothing in the constitution about not taxing churches. The agreement for Churches to not pay taxes was they were to stay out of politics. Since they haven’t been able to do that, it’s time to start taxing again. Not to mention redirect any public school funds from private church schools back to the public schools where they should be used in the first place. No vouchers either.
That Supreme Court ruling is murderous and disgusting.
But I’m not sure what legal thinking was behind it.
Because on Friday they rejected a petition from a Louisiana pastor [Tony Spell] who sought emergency relief from criminal charges he faced for holding services in violation of large-gathering restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic. So why this if that?
Now is the time for some self-proclaimed “religious” group (“born-again Aztecs”?) to petition the courts to allow them to practice human sacrifice… and point to this Supreme Court decision as precedent.
As an anarchist, I look at religion and see that individual religious feelings and expression of those feelings is sometimes good, sometimes bad, just as most things are. I’ve seen a lot of good done by individuals who are religious.I also see that religious institutions are prone to the same kinds of abuses of power as most institutions. I’m not sure what good religious institutions do for individuals expressing their religious feelings.
In essence, if it is against my religion, it is against the law. Move over Iran, Jim Jones, and Satan worshippers, here we come to save the day from religious oppression!
Actions based upon “sincere and deeply held religious beliefs”* are now USSC legally justified/sanctioned. As a result of this despicable and idiotic ruling the Court may well get the opportunity to rule, in the not too distant future, on criminal charges brought against True Christian™ defendants convicted of more serious violations of local ordinances and other statutes, using belief as their defense, than refusing to provide wedding cakes to non-heterosexual citizens.
*only as if/when said beliefs exactly match those of the Supreme Court Catholic Six
The political tools who call themselves “Pro-Life” are nothing of the sort. They are anti-abortion, but most of them also support capital punishment, horrible treatment of the poor and needy, and war.
If you’re going to be consistent, you need to be anti-war, anti-capital punishment, anti-abortion, and support helping the poor. Pope Francis has also added support for Black Lives Matter and working to address global warming…
During the years of the Black Plague, going to church meant even more opportunities to share the plague, in close quarters. But hey, only about 1/3 of the population died. Obviously, all that praying helped…
It is not a judge’s duty to determine what is right or wrong, good or bad, up or down. It is their job to administer the law and if the law allows (as it does) people to freely congregate in the practice of their religion and spread the SARS COV-2 virus then they hove no discretion but to apply the law. Even when the law is WRONG!!!
Time to TAX THE CHURCHES, since they are NOW nothing but Political Action Groups! And the taxes should be made RETROACTIVE to the date that they were granted tax-exempt status! Let’s see the Catholic Cult cough up a few BILLION $$ in back Property Taxes! Same for the Mormons and the Baptists… and the rest of the bunch!
People are, in fact, only allowed to freely congregate when they present no danger or possibility of danger to others.
What, for example, are curfews for?
Even “free congregations” can require permits.
While the church-goers may have a right to worship, it does not mean that they have the right to spread disease.
Suppose a group of people decide that the virus is their God’s way of collecting souls for its war against Evil. Their duty is to help increase the number of souls for an upcoming Battle Against Evil. So they must expose themselves to the virus and then go about embracing and kissing other people, whether they are believers are not. When ordered to stop, they proclaim that this is their religion and you are denying them the proper expression of their worship.
Would any rational court accept that the right of a few outweighs the rights of the many?
Yep…and as always, the church funds “trump” public health. So, please, to everyone who actually believes in science and public health experts: Stay Home. If God is everywhere, then He is with you wherever you are. Be Safe.
DD Wiz Premium Member over 3 years ago
Judges who call themselves “pro-life” issue rulings that allow churches to kill people by the tens of thousands. There is not a shred of Christian decency or morality in any of these hypocrites.
Daeder over 3 years ago
Conservatives love them some death cults!
Concretionist over 3 years ago
The current collection of Supremes believe (despite what they say, it DOES matter) that “freedom of religion” means that religions are special organizations that have all kinds of rights that normal ones don’t have. Including the magical property that people (and their organizations) can claim discriminatory behavior is “religious” and then, (if the Supremes agree that it’s a “true” religion) the discrimination is legal. So, if that’s the case, what’s a little manslaughter thrown into the mix?
Say What Now‽ Premium Member over 3 years ago
Their imaginary being is supposedly omnipresent, but they have to clump together to get their indoctrination fix while risking theirs and other peoples lives. It shows how their beliefs are always on shaky ground.
PICTO over 3 years ago
Churches are buildings. They can’t kill people. But they can house killers.
Walter Kocker Premium Member over 3 years ago
. . . and the churches always need money . . . lots of money . . . donations . . . tithes . . . collections . . . (sigh)
LookingGlass Premium Member over 3 years ago
OT but still a “fun” fact: McTrutle just decreed that in-person lunches for the republiKKKans will be no longer held “in-person” because of this Rona HOAX!!
GiantShetlandPony over 3 years ago
Can we start taxing churches again. There is nothing in the constitution about not taxing churches. The agreement for Churches to not pay taxes was they were to stay out of politics. Since they haven’t been able to do that, it’s time to start taxing again. Not to mention redirect any public school funds from private church schools back to the public schools where they should be used in the first place. No vouchers either.
KenseidenXL over 3 years ago
Like churches HAVEN’T been killing people for centuries?!
Patjade over 3 years ago
With the new Mullahs installed, the Supreme Court is becoming more of a religious institution than a legal one.
jimmjonzz Premium Member over 3 years ago
That Supreme Court ruling is murderous and disgusting.
But I’m not sure what legal thinking was behind it.
Because on Friday they rejected a petition from a Louisiana pastor [Tony Spell] who sought emergency relief from criminal charges he faced for holding services in violation of large-gathering restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic. So why this if that?
???
Lolapoo Premium Member over 3 years ago
To move civilization forward, I see the ruling as addition by subtraction.
Valiant1943 Premium Member over 3 years ago
Whited Sepulchers…an old but accurate term
Ontman over 3 years ago
Churches (religions) have been killing people for centuries.
feverjr Premium Member over 3 years ago
Waiting for their ruling on seatbelts, stoplights and DUI…. here’s looking at you, Brett
gopher gofer over 3 years ago
welcome to the era of trump judges…
FrankErnesto over 3 years ago
This ruling, I am afraid, is just a crack in the dam. Wait for the flood when they really get moving.
Masterskrain Premium Member over 3 years ago
Maybe we will get lucky and Thomas will stroke out JUST AFTER Jan. 21, 2021…
mourdac Premium Member over 3 years ago
I’m waiting for the Supremes to rule that burning “witches” is a legal expression of the 1st Amendment.
ArtyD2 Premium Member over 3 years ago
No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
eclairewl Premium Member over 3 years ago
Or in the ministers and pastors who encourage people to come. $$$
VT8/VF84 over 3 years ago
INQUISITION
gammaguy over 3 years ago
Now is the time for some self-proclaimed “religious” group (“born-again Aztecs”?) to petition the courts to allow them to practice human sacrifice… and point to this Supreme Court decision as precedent.
ForALaugh Premium Member over 3 years ago
The killing is OK as long as it’s in the name of god.
Super Fly over 3 years ago
But, that’s their business: birth to death and Beyond.
NeoconMan over 3 years ago
It’s alright for churches to kill people. God will know His own.
lonecat over 3 years ago
As an anarchist, I look at religion and see that individual religious feelings and expression of those feelings is sometimes good, sometimes bad, just as most things are. I’ve seen a lot of good done by individuals who are religious.I also see that religious institutions are prone to the same kinds of abuses of power as most institutions. I’m not sure what good religious institutions do for individuals expressing their religious feelings.
Michael G. over 3 years ago
“For I am the life … "
Alberta Oil Premium Member over 3 years ago
And.. so it has been since “churches”.. the Supreme Court is just following long established principle.. there really was no other option.
MG over 3 years ago
In essence, if it is against my religion, it is against the law. Move over Iran, Jim Jones, and Satan worshippers, here we come to save the day from religious oppression!
Radish the wordsmith over 3 years ago
Republicans are anti science, that is why they spread covid everywhere.
tung cha cha cha over 3 years ago
I hope President Biden can expand the number of judges on the Court so sane minded and humane Judges can be appointed.
lsnrchrd.1 Premium Member over 3 years ago
Actions based upon “sincere and deeply held religious beliefs”* are now USSC legally justified/sanctioned. As a result of this despicable and idiotic ruling the Court may well get the opportunity to rule, in the not too distant future, on criminal charges brought against True Christian™ defendants convicted of more serious violations of local ordinances and other statutes, using belief as their defense, than refusing to provide wedding cakes to non-heterosexual citizens.
*only as if/when said beliefs exactly match those of the Supreme Court Catholic Six
Motivemagus over 3 years ago
The political tools who call themselves “Pro-Life” are nothing of the sort. They are anti-abortion, but most of them also support capital punishment, horrible treatment of the poor and needy, and war.
If you’re going to be consistent, you need to be anti-war, anti-capital punishment, anti-abortion, and support helping the poor. Pope Francis has also added support for Black Lives Matter and working to address global warming…
Baslim the Beggar Premium Member over 3 years ago
During the years of the Black Plague, going to church meant even more opportunities to share the plague, in close quarters. But hey, only about 1/3 of the population died. Obviously, all that praying helped…
walkingmancomics over 3 years ago
Time to flood the Supreme Court with opinion.
guy42 over 3 years ago
It is not a judge’s duty to determine what is right or wrong, good or bad, up or down. It is their job to administer the law and if the law allows (as it does) people to freely congregate in the practice of their religion and spread the SARS COV-2 virus then they hove no discretion but to apply the law. Even when the law is WRONG!!!
Masterskrain Premium Member over 3 years ago
Time to TAX THE CHURCHES, since they are NOW nothing but Political Action Groups! And the taxes should be made RETROACTIVE to the date that they were granted tax-exempt status! Let’s see the Catholic Cult cough up a few BILLION $$ in back Property Taxes! Same for the Mormons and the Baptists… and the rest of the bunch!
Baslim the Beggar Premium Member over 3 years ago
@guy42:
People are, in fact, only allowed to freely congregate when they present no danger or possibility of danger to others.
What, for example, are curfews for?
Even “free congregations” can require permits.
While the church-goers may have a right to worship, it does not mean that they have the right to spread disease.
Suppose a group of people decide that the virus is their God’s way of collecting souls for its war against Evil. Their duty is to help increase the number of souls for an upcoming Battle Against Evil. So they must expose themselves to the virus and then go about embracing and kissing other people, whether they are believers are not. When ordered to stop, they proclaim that this is their religion and you are denying them the proper expression of their worship.
Would any rational court accept that the right of a few outweighs the rights of the many?
Only an irrational court would do so.
Pgalden1 Premium Member over 3 years ago
Yep…and as always, the church funds “trump” public health. So, please, to everyone who actually believes in science and public health experts: Stay Home. If God is everywhere, then He is with you wherever you are. Be Safe.
The Love of Money is . . . over 3 years ago
Stay tuned as The Supreme Court votes on Obamacare (Affordable Care Act) and Roe v. Wade . . . . and Democracy.
T Smith over 3 years ago
If the death toll could be limited to church-goers, I’d be all for it.
Radish the wordsmith over 3 years ago
In 1918 you could go to jail for not wearing a mask. They were smarter then.
ferddo over 3 years ago
It’s “okay” for churches to kill people because they give them a straight path to “salvation”…
henshaven Premium Member over 3 years ago
Hey, just like in olden times! (Stoning, pressing, hanging, gibbeting, etc.)