You have to admit the stories from the 80’s aren’t that strong. That’s what pulled me into the MPI reboot, better writing. The actors are good too. It’s like ST TOS vs ST TNG. Better stories and writing.
Looking back at the 80’s the sitcoms were better than many of the action shows.
Ethically it is stealing. Put your spin and name calling all you want. A service was provided, the majority workers agreed to it, so new hires must follow along. As right always say, “find someplace else to work.”
Also, of course corps and the rich will get politicians elected and judges placed to have the “right to work” (for less) laws created. If the dues aren’t paid, the union is weakened , which is the plan all along.
We’ve done Reaganomics for 40+ years, busting unions, killing off the middle class, giving it all to the rich. It hasn’t worked, time to try something else or go back that was working before.
Getting a service and not paying for it is stealing, no matter how you spin it, nor how the union busting Corts or Legislation do it. Yes, the option out of using your dues for political ads can be in the contract.
The best part is your for the party that had been destroying the middle class for the last 40 years, but the good news there seems to be a movement to increase union memberships.
Well if the President is above the law, he could have Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh arrested, because he can. No need for any rules or laws, because he can.
So you’re OK with getting benefits and not paying dues that helped getting them? Sounds like shoplifting to me… If “your take”, I don’t want my dues to go to political ads etc., then get that put in the union contract, with no change in the monthly dues amount.
You have to admit the stories from the 80’s aren’t that strong. That’s what pulled me into the MPI reboot, better writing. The actors are good too. It’s like ST TOS vs ST TNG. Better stories and writing.
Looking back at the 80’s the sitcoms were better than many of the action shows.