Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

Non Sequitur

Comments (32) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Varnes

    Varnes said, about 15 hours ago

    Tax cut? What? Ha! You still pay taxes?….Looser…..

  2. argythree

    argythree said, about 15 hours ago

    Sorry, pal, but you’ll never reach those elevated heights with a down-level scam like this one. You need to hire a hacker…

  3. watmiwori

    watmiwori said, about 15 hours ago

    Sorry, bub,only them as has, gets.

  4. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 15 hours ago

    He’s 1% there.

  5. Three Steps Over Japan

    Three Steps Over Japan said, about 14 hours ago

    He doesn’t have a Patreon account?

  6. Gigantor

    Gigantor said, about 14 hours ago

    He needs a Kickstarter campaign.

  7. ironic eggbeater

    ironic eggbeater said, about 14 hours ago

    He’s sort of there already. Just don’t report any income from donations he receives and keep the money in an offshore account so the govt doesn’t know about it. Though it’s not quite the same as when the 1% do it. His savings would be a pittance in comparison.

  8. Hardthought

    Hardthought said, about 10 hours ago

    Make under $40K, qualify fir Earned Income Credit and get a refund larger than you paid in.

    Now that’s a “tax cut”, getting more than you contribute.

  9. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, about 10 hours ago

    He is at the level where they are not tax cuts, but tax rebates for taxes never paid.
    Everybody accepts that taxes paid by business and the rich actually create poor economic conditions that require handouts to the poor and lower economic classes in their own tax status, and that a portion of the tax burden must be allocated to them to offset the economic harm done by that taxation. But that’s about as far as the thinking goes.
    A stable and growing economy that supplies enough in goods and services that the poorest of the poor are actually quite well off isn’t even considered an option, and an economy where the richest of the rich have to struggle for scraps is much preferred.
    People are actually quite humorous. We aren’t very bright.

  10. Justjoking

    Justjoking said, about 10 hours ago

    47% of the population agree with this cartoon.

  11. cdward

    cdward said, about 9 hours ago

    @Hardthought

    Make more than $100 million, and you can get even more from the government.

  12. Puddlesplatt McLearn

    Puddlesplatt McLearn said, about 9 hours ago

    a dream few will ever see.

  13. wdgnas

    wdgnas said, about 8 hours ago

    @BrassOrchid

    ‘where the richest of the rich have to struggle for scraps’ ha that’s a good one.

  14. Technojunkie

    Technojunkie said, about 8 hours ago

    Taxes? How quaint. Print money out of thin air, pass it out to your friends at Goldman Sachs, etc. Very few of the 99% will comprehend how they’re being looted. Gold and silver used to protect us. No wonder the corporatists get a case of the vapors when someone suggests going back to it.

  15. p51strega

    p51strega said, about 8 hours ago

    @BrassOrchid

    No, everybody does not accept that inane concept. The most steady and prolonged economic growth in modern times was during the Clinton administration when taxes were higher than current taxes. A strong economy requires spending which requires money in the hands of the as many people as possible. The current business trend of keeping the maximum amount in the hands of executives & directors while sending sub-livable wages overseas stifles the US economy by taking cash away from “spenders”. The government is forced to step in so we don’t have to walk a gauntlet of beggars everywhere we go and so crime isn’t the only alternative. Tax payers do receive a benefit from government support of low wage workers.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (17).