I once read in Scientific American that some college students had tried to calculate whether you actually got less wet by running in the rain to make it inside quicker, or whether you got equally wet no matter how fast you went. To make calculations simpler, the assumed a constant rate of rain and no wind. Under those conditions, at any given time, a given volume of air always contains the same number of raindrops (which are assumed to be of equal size). Instead of an irregularly shaped human being, they based their calculations on a cuboid of about the same size, say, to make calculations easier. (I don’t remember the dimensions they used, but, since I’m more used to the metric system, I’ll assume 2×0.5×0.5 meters, which gives an area of 1 square meter for each vertical face). Lets assume that each liter (0.001 cubic meter) of air contains 1 raindrop, and that each raindrop is 1 ml, which comes out to 1 liter of rain per cubic meter of air. If we say that our cuboid person has to go 100 meters in the rain, he will go through 100 cubic meters of air and get 100 liters of water on him, regardless of how fast he goes. So, their conclusion was that it doesn’t matter how fast you go. You always get equally wet.
Now, we know instinctively and by experience that that’s not right. There’s a reason people start running to get inside when it rains. So what’s wrong with the calculation?
pschearer Premium Member about 3 years ago
What?! The cat isn’t staying?
Imagine about 3 years ago
The self-closing mechanism costs extra.
Darth_Walrus_1975 about 3 years ago
Needs more work on it.
rekam Premium Member about 3 years ago
“Harm can come to a young lad.” (The Goon Show)
Aussie Down Under about 3 years ago
What goes up must come down.
LiamG.P about 3 years ago
I laughed, actually
Ivy Valory Premium Member about 3 years ago
Fump … back to the drawing board.
LookingGlass Premium Member about 3 years ago
Close but, no CEEgar!!
Gent about 3 years ago
Now try running away from a hungry predator while holding that heavy thing.
Enter.Name.Here about 3 years ago
The creation of the dumbell, both the weight lift tool and the user.
Straker UFO about 3 years ago
Wasn’t this gag done before in one of the early B.C. strips?
DaveG1960 about 3 years ago
Needs work, I would put a peg through the shaft for starters….
Doug K about 3 years ago
Maybe the “fump” in the head will give him another (better) idea – knock some sense into him).
… or … he could become the “Carrot Top” of his time.
Meg: All Seriousness Aside about 3 years ago
Agree… umbrella is a pretty funny word.
jagedlo about 3 years ago
It was a good idea in theory, the execution just needed some work!
Ron Dunn Premium Member about 3 years ago
The “fump” strikes again.
Purple People Eater about 3 years ago
I once read in Scientific American that some college students had tried to calculate whether you actually got less wet by running in the rain to make it inside quicker, or whether you got equally wet no matter how fast you went. To make calculations simpler, the assumed a constant rate of rain and no wind. Under those conditions, at any given time, a given volume of air always contains the same number of raindrops (which are assumed to be of equal size). Instead of an irregularly shaped human being, they based their calculations on a cuboid of about the same size, say, to make calculations easier. (I don’t remember the dimensions they used, but, since I’m more used to the metric system, I’ll assume 2×0.5×0.5 meters, which gives an area of 1 square meter for each vertical face). Lets assume that each liter (0.001 cubic meter) of air contains 1 raindrop, and that each raindrop is 1 ml, which comes out to 1 liter of rain per cubic meter of air. If we say that our cuboid person has to go 100 meters in the rain, he will go through 100 cubic meters of air and get 100 liters of water on him, regardless of how fast he goes. So, their conclusion was that it doesn’t matter how fast you go. You always get equally wet.
Now, we know instinctively and by experience that that’s not right. There’s a reason people start running to get inside when it rains. So what’s wrong with the calculation?
Michael G. about 3 years ago
“The wet head is dead!”
vaughnrl2003 Premium Member about 3 years ago
Lesson learned. Umbrellas are dangerous. Stick to slickers. (Do people have “slickers” any more?)
Nyckname about 3 years ago
Meanwhile, that high pitched sound you hear is Wiley, who was caught outside.
jango about 3 years ago
That’s using his head!
ChessPirate about 3 years ago
[BUMB!] “Er… Shoot!”
KEA about 3 years ago
inventing slapstick
Alberta Oil Premium Member about 3 years ago
And after all these years that closing mechanism still is not perfect
michael3114 about 3 years ago
I call it a dumbbell.
harf59 about 3 years ago
“Honey, the forecast calls for rain. You’d better bring your hilarious with you.” I don’t see it catching on.
TysonJason about 3 years ago
He Just needed one extra bolt
raybarb44 about 3 years ago
Needs work…..
JasonRivera about 3 years ago
It’s a one wheel if he got one more wheel
GaryR1 about 3 years ago
Needs to have a little more development, that’s all.
cuzinron47 about 3 years ago
The good news is it will fair much better in high winds.
Snolep about 3 years ago
Looks like something I would do.
zeexenon about 3 years ago
Works for me, Axle.
sarahbowl1 Premium Member about 3 years ago
They underestimate his invention abilities, don’t they!
Buckeye67 about 3 years ago
Back to the drawing board.
JesseLouisMartinez about 3 years ago
So do I
WCraft Premium Member about 3 years ago
Must be tough for a really long rain storm; holding that thing up…
R.R.Bedford about 3 years ago
A the old bumbershoot gag, now if I ever see a bumber I know enough to shoot it.
paullp Premium Member about 3 years ago
Something new — a comic that comes with its own comment.