“It is clear that Gunther means he is NOT going to share that information”
I get that. I’m just pointing out a possibility for another misunderstanding.
Sheesh!!!!!!!! Lighten up, people!
So, nothing can be misunderstood, then? Like, for example, Les’ question (actually putting finishing Luann’s question) couldn’t possibly have been misunderstood as him saying that Gunther and Bets were “doing it”, leading to rumors which, in turn, led to to the current situation? No, I guess not. I must have missed something. You can never have misunderstandings in comic strips.
“Don’t feel bad. Dreamy made the SAME mistake over at Arcamax. :)”
If I’m not the only one to see it, maybe it really is ambiguous. And maybe… just maybe… it’s ambiguous on purpos, so that Luann can later misinterpret Gunther’s answer.
Are you a cartoonist?
“Sheesh”? And with 8 exclamation points, no less? Why does it offend you that i point out that the strip is ambiguous?
If the TV dinners are where they were last night, does that mean they didn’t eat them?
Is that “not” referring back to the first panel (… if you should know or not) or is he saying they’re not doing it?
I just looked it up and, apparently, haɪtθ is not an error, but an archaic pronunciation, which has seen a resurgance recently.
Whatever they call themselves, there are only 5 duplicates and 1 original. In the Jan. 14 strip, one of the duplicates says that the duplicator “burned out after the the fifth one of us”.
That panel shows the real Calvin and 5 duplicates, exactly what W6BXQ, John said.