Get Fuzzy by Darby Conley for September 24, 2021

You’ve got to draw the line somewhere, Satchel.

Here’s where you turn a phrase and grab Bucky by the neck and say "What’s a matter pal Satch got your tongue.

It seems a bit out of character for clueless Satch to be aware of Schrodinger’s cat’s hypotheticalness.

Through all the discussion about it last week, no one pointed out that “Pavlov’s dog” was a real dog (probably more than one).

Schrödinger’s cat both can and cannot beat up Pavlov’s dog, but only until they actually fight, and then the wave function collapses and only one of them comes out the winner.

It’s okay, Satchel, Schrödinger’s cat is locked in a theoretical box.

Satchel you must learn to push back ;-)

It’s useless, Satchel, to worry about predictions … until “Heisenberg Compensators” are invented …

Satchel seems quite rational to me

Once again, I love that dog!

Bucky is hyper theatrical.

Satch has a point. Real cats are bad enough.

Possibly ,,, Schroedinger’s cat could both beat up/not beat up Pavlov’s dog.

My money’s on the dogs, I mean, all that slobber! ☺

: D

Satchel is a deep and knowledgable thinker. He just happens to be a slow thinker.

satch is an idiot savant in some areas

Other scientific community pets never achieved as much recognition – nobody these days knows of Rutherford’s Gerbil.

This week, I saw a rerun of The Big Bang Theory where Leonard debated if he should try to date Penny. Sheldon’s advice was Schrodinger’s Cat—Leonard won’t know what will happen until he tries dating her. Cool timing on this one.