Who gave stanford permission to mess with the English languarge? It is not our language to change; it was around WAY before there was a United States or Stanford University. what part of this is “education.”?
One should note that Stanford did not ban any words. Rather, it made suggestions on usage. Per their website: “We have particularly heard concerns about the guide’s treatment of the term “American.” We understand and appreciate those concerns. To be very clear, not only is the use of the term “American” not banned at Stanford, it is absolutely welcomed. The intent of this particular entry on the EHLI website was to provide perspective on how the term may be imprecise in some specific uses, and to show that in some cases the alternate term “US citizen” may be more precise and appropriate. But, we clearly missed the mark in this presentation.”
I find it ironic that right-wingers scream about free speech but are the first (and primary) book banners. Right winger Elin Musk whined about free speech till he got control of Twitter, then he started banning people whose words he did not like.
Here’s a self-explanatory headline from today.New York, California, and Illinois Saw Historic Population Drops in 2021Regardless of the reason, the data are clear. Americans want out of these states.This from the U.S. Census, not Fox News, Patjade!
“She noted that the context of the interpretation is important, as it was not supposedly issued for broad interpretation but rather a set of internal recommendations for the school’s IT department. As far as she could tell, there’s no mechanism for enforcement of these standards, and so they function more like suggestions.”
WHAT???!!! Oh yeah, that’s right: slavery never happened, nor Jim Crow, & the Civil War was about Tariffs & climate change & COVID are fake news – & the world is flat (just look: so’s the moon.)!!!
And add to this politically driven re-education, a report recommends that the Marine Corps no longer use Sir or Ma’am in recruit training when addressing our Drill Instructors.
The poor precious little darlings might get an extra tongue lashing from the DI.
Oh to hear what Chesty and R. Lee Ermey would have to say about this.
Liberal with two doctorates here. That list is absurd. It’s so bad, I have to wonder if it is a hoax, and then wonder if I’m just wishing too hard. It’s not as bad as “defund the police,” but it’s pretty close.
Do we have to take our shoe off before shooting ourselves in the foot?
A demonstration of “critical thought” taught in public schools these days. So many “Americans” these days, who have a public education/indoctrination are so anxious to surrender their freedoms. It is like they have never read history and they believe everything the media tells them.
Well I did a little research and found out that it was Stanford’s IT Dept that created the list for department use. Stanford, apparently, does not sanction the list. Nonetheless, it was their INFORMATION Technology Department that created this??!? i wouldn’t trust them to make a Swiss cheese sandwich after this piece of mental garbage.
gccowboy27 over 1 year ago
Who gave stanford permission to mess with the English languarge? It is not our language to change; it was around WAY before there was a United States or Stanford University. what part of this is “education.”?
cdward over 1 year ago
One should note that Stanford did not ban any words. Rather, it made suggestions on usage. Per their website: “We have particularly heard concerns about the guide’s treatment of the term “American.” We understand and appreciate those concerns. To be very clear, not only is the use of the term “American” not banned at Stanford, it is absolutely welcomed. The intent of this particular entry on the EHLI website was to provide perspective on how the term may be imprecise in some specific uses, and to show that in some cases the alternate term “US citizen” may be more precise and appropriate. But, we clearly missed the mark in this presentation.”
cdward over 1 year ago
I find it ironic that right-wingers scream about free speech but are the first (and primary) book banners. Right winger Elin Musk whined about free speech till he got control of Twitter, then he started banning people whose words he did not like.
FJB Premium Member over 1 year ago
Here’s a self-explanatory headline from today.New York, California, and Illinois Saw Historic Population Drops in 2021Regardless of the reason, the data are clear. Americans want out of these states.This from the U.S. Census, not Fox News, Patjade!
The Nodding Head over 1 year ago
Now do Ron DiVisive’s crackdown on faculty speech at the University of Florida.
fusilier over 1 year ago
Rhetorical Question:
Why is there no “Dislike” option?
fusilier
James 2:24
Radish the wordsmith over 1 year ago
Lying traitor Kari Lake had her 2 days in court, Katie Hobbs will get her 4 years in the Gov’s Office on Jan.
ChristopherBurns over 1 year ago
Context is all and Mr. Kelly has no appreciation of it. From NewsWeek:
https://www.newsweek.com/stanford-criticism-slammed-putting-american-forbidden-word-language-list-1768543
“She noted that the context of the interpretation is important, as it was not supposedly issued for broad interpretation but rather a set of internal recommendations for the school’s IT department. As far as she could tell, there’s no mechanism for enforcement of these standards, and so they function more like suggestions.”
sedrelwesley2 Premium Member over 1 year ago
WHAT???!!! Oh yeah, that’s right: slavery never happened, nor Jim Crow, & the Civil War was about Tariffs & climate change & COVID are fake news – & the world is flat (just look: so’s the moon.)!!!
DrDon1 over 1 year ago
Post-Gazette won’t negotiate with Printer’s Union while continuing to pay Kelley for this “opinion”
Rise22 over 1 year ago
NO ONE is going to tell me what words I can or cannot use.
charliekane over 1 year ago
Highlighting another problem that doesn’t really exist, are we?
alex Coke Premium Member over 1 year ago
Does being a socialist negate every idea a person has?
"It's the End of the World!!!" Premium Member over 1 year ago
And add to this politically driven re-education, a report recommends that the Marine Corps no longer use Sir or Ma’am in recruit training when addressing our Drill Instructors.
The poor precious little darlings might get an extra tongue lashing from the DI.
Oh to hear what Chesty and R. Lee Ermey would have to say about this.
suelou over 1 year ago
How about “Go f#&k yourself” ???
Rich Douglas over 1 year ago
Liberal with two doctorates here. That list is absurd. It’s so bad, I have to wonder if it is a hoax, and then wonder if I’m just wishing too hard. It’s not as bad as “defund the police,” but it’s pretty close.
Do we have to take our shoe off before shooting ourselves in the foot?
Bill.Franklin over 1 year ago
A demonstration of “critical thought” taught in public schools these days. So many “Americans” these days, who have a public education/indoctrination are so anxious to surrender their freedoms. It is like they have never read history and they believe everything the media tells them.
dogday Premium Member over 1 year ago
Well I did a little research and found out that it was Stanford’s IT Dept that created the list for department use. Stanford, apparently, does not sanction the list. Nonetheless, it was their INFORMATION Technology Department that created this??!? i wouldn’t trust them to make a Swiss cheese sandwich after this piece of mental garbage.
zerorest over 1 year ago
Strawman alert!
schaefer jim over 1 year ago
Well Sun I going to censor you and pull the shades!
papajim545 over 1 year ago
No, Trumplicas are