Let the kids have their glitter…as long as THEY vacuum the bus every day. You mess it up, YOU clean it up. Your “freedoms” exist only if they do not infringe on other people’s freedoms.
Rights my tail! It’s a school bus operated by the school and, therefore, the school can say what or what not people (or kids) can have on their school busses. It seems to be an open season on saying “it’s unconstitutional” when people can’t get their own way or, in this case, kid’s rights are infringed simply because of glitter use.
Wow, and I thought this lameness couldn’t drag on even lamer. I was wrong again. Maybe we’ll get week 2 of this battle.
I thought the whole thing was it was all the holiday wear that was loaded with glitter. Well the holidays are long past, so why are the parents fighting for their kids’ glitter rights now?
dadthedawg Premium Member over 1 year ago
The kids need to…..litter their glitter.
B UTTONS over 1 year ago
LEAVE NO TRACE.
DISPOSE OF GLITTER PROPERLY – Pack it in Pack it out
Kjvman1 over 1 year ago
First job was working in a glitter factory. Cutting those shiny little squares with scissors was tedious. Then counting 50 thousand for each bottle…
Kidon Ha-Shomer over 1 year ago
If Ed forbade the doing of math homework on his bus…would that be a tally ban?
Doctor Toon over 1 year ago
I should have paid more attention in school, I dont remember the constitution saying anything about glitter
The Reader Premium Member over 1 year ago
All that glitter could blind the driver, and he could end up hitting a mailbox.
PoodleGroomer over 1 year ago
They can do anything they want if they don’t distract the driver and clean up when they leave.
Blu Bunny over 1 year ago
Ed should wear a glitter jacket and pants. Kids see adult doing it and how gross that looks they might stop.
DawnQuinn1 over 1 year ago
Let the kids have their glitter…as long as THEY vacuum the bus every day. You mess it up, YOU clean it up. Your “freedoms” exist only if they do not infringe on other people’s freedoms.
JudithStocker Premium Member over 1 year ago
Rights my tail! It’s a school bus operated by the school and, therefore, the school can say what or what not people (or kids) can have on their school busses. It seems to be an open season on saying “it’s unconstitutional” when people can’t get their own way or, in this case, kid’s rights are infringed simply because of glitter use.
WilliamVollmer over 1 year ago
Just tell them it’s an OSHA issue.
comixbomix over 1 year ago
WOW!!!!! Epically solid punchline there, guys.
JBWeld over 1 year ago
There’s no right to litter, so there’s no right to glitter either.
kathleenhicks62 over 1 year ago
The idea is if “old” people like something- -it’s ick to youngsters?
AndrewSihler over 1 year ago
Howzzat? (Must be one of the Classified Amendments.)
Mopman over 1 year ago
Wow, and I thought this lameness couldn’t drag on even lamer. I was wrong again. Maybe we’ll get week 2 of this battle.
I thought the whole thing was it was all the holiday wear that was loaded with glitter. Well the holidays are long past, so why are the parents fighting for their kids’ glitter rights now?
bakana over 1 year ago
So, a whole Bunch of Karens showed up.
ToneeRhianRose over 1 year ago
I’d tell them, “Sorry, my bus, my rules! If you don’t like it you can drive your brats to school yourselves!”