Steve Kelley for July 15, 2021

  1. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Not even close Kelley.

     •  Reply
  2. Triumph
    Daeder  almost 3 years ago

    Here’s a simple question for Steve Kelley or any cultservative who reads GoComics:

    Was there ANY significant voter fraud in Texas in the last election? Did it even come close to actually affecting the outcome of a single race?

    (Okay, two related questions.)

     •  Reply
  3. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  almost 3 years ago

    I suppose that Kelley thinks this makes them look stupid. And it’s true, it DOES make someone look stupid. But it’s not the Texas Dems. They just look desperate to try to salvage SOMETHING of their (former) democracy.

     •  Reply
  4. Tf 117
    RAGs  almost 3 years ago

    I am sure that the majority of Democrats would accept a voter ID law IF they started by:

    First set up a system for all citizens to be able to easily get an ID, including making sure that all citizens can reach a place to get their picture taken for the card.

    AND once every citizen has a card THEN write an equitable law.

     •  Reply
  5. 290px wow signal
    ImDaRealAni  almost 3 years ago

    Conman. Nothing else.

     •  Reply
  6. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Just another LIE from a Trump Disciple cartoonist.

    .

    Trump Disciples lie about EVERY issue. Every time.

    .

    Next up: SKelley tells everything he ‘knows’ about widespread undetectable voter fraud.

     •  Reply
  7. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/jul/14/fox-news-host-texas-democrat-james-talerico

     •  Reply
  8. Platypys icon
    janiceg Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Don’t right-wingers ever get tired of deliberately misleading people? This simplistic take on the Texas proposal is misleading and downplays the measures that would significantly negatively affect the ability of disadvantaged people to exercise their Constitutional right to vote and the odds of a fair election. No Republican official has yet to provide an explanation of why this bill is necessary given that despite desperate searches by many right-wing elected officials, lawyers, and groups, no evidence of voter fraud has been found.

    (Thanks to Democratic pressure, the GOP has already removed a provision that would have shut down many urban polling precincts, and another that would have ended early voting on Sunday mornings, when many black churches do “Souls to the Polls” voter ferrying.)

    Among the things in the current proposal:

    - Forbids the state from removing partisan poll watchers unless certain election workers witness the poll watcher breaking the law, and the poll watcher is given a warning first making it a misdemeanor to “intentionally or knowingly refuse to accept a watcher for service when acceptance of the watcher is required by this section.” An election worker who pushes too hard to keep a particular partisan or disruptive poll watcher out of a polling place risks being jailed for up to 180 days.

    - Makes it a felony for any public official to send many voters an application to vote by mail if the voter did not request such an application.

    - Bans drive-through voting.

    - Imposes limits on 24-hour voting options.

    - Requires new identification requirements for absentee voters, requiring either the number of a driver’s license or state-issued ID card, the last four digits of their Social Security number, or a statement that they have not been issued such a number, all issues to retrieve or obtain for many disadvantaged voters.

     •  Reply
  9. 392945134 10222966427101539 7291125585212099960 n  1
    FJB  Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Well done, Steve. Bravo.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Judge Magney  almost 3 years ago

    So when Texas legislative Democrats use a procedural rule (quorum) to prevent a Republican majority from enacting a voting law, it’s bad. But when US Senate Republicans use a procedural rule (filibuster) to prevent a Democratic majority from enacting a voting law, that’s good?

     •  Reply
  11. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  almost 3 years ago

    Dumb.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    WaitingMan  almost 3 years ago

    My nephew and his family have lived in Texas for the last six years, as that is where his wife’s family is based. They moved back to New Jersey last month. Seems they have had enough Texas for one lifetime.

     •  Reply
  13. Picture
    Ontman  almost 3 years ago

    Consider the cartoonist. Nuff said.

     •  Reply
  14. 7bf81e16 8ef8 4134 8774 9ce680cc41b6
    The Nodding Head  almost 3 years ago

    Missing: Texas makes voting harder Han any other US state or territory.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    suzalee  almost 3 years ago

    Even the Republicans who proposed this bill admit that there was no fraud in the last election here in our state. In that election here in Texas we had more participation in voting than we have ever had. That’s a good thing. We should want everyone to vote and participate in our democracy. This bill is make it more difficult for people, particularly minorities and the poor, to vote. That’s voter suppression. Their great fear is that if enough people vote, they will be voted out of office. That’s what this bill is about.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Vidrinath Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Steve, there are good people out there. Kal is one of them.

    https://www.gocomics.com/kal/2021/07/15

    You are not.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    tamrich59  almost 3 years ago

    If you read the bill, what is one thing wrong with it?….don’t think it is making it harder to vote, just making it harder to cheat….why would anyone have a problem with that?

     •  Reply
  18. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  almost 3 years ago

    Vote nullifying anti democracy republicans stink.

     •  Reply
  19. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  almost 3 years ago

    Who would buy this cartoon?

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    preacherman  almost 3 years ago

    Actually, Steve, the Texas Dems move was simple and brilliant. It stopped legalized insurrection and gave the Dems a lot of great press.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    Rayzor63  almost 3 years ago

    Swing and a miss

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    piper_gilbert  almost 3 years ago

    Steve, you must like cherries, because you’re sure good at picking them. You left a lot out.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    thelordthygod666  almost 3 years ago

    Abbot is afraid of Trumpette primary candidates, so he ordered these extraordinary sessions to shout his red meat agenda (transgender, abortion, critical race, etc.). Texas House Democrats need to lease housing in DC until our Texas GOP primaries are over.

     •  Reply
  24. Large cottagepainting   copy  2
    StackableContainers  almost 3 years ago

    Gaming the system to get a result is exactly what Republicans excel at. They just hate when it doesn’t work to towards their goals.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    jhayesd31  almost 3 years ago

    By the way the "Matching signatures will only apply in Blue districts.

    The same way that Florida’s law barring protesters from blocking freeways ONLY applies to BLM. When the Pro Republican Cuban immigrants ( Republicans “Good” immigrants ) block the freeway the police give them an escort.

     •  Reply
  26. Pat new 150
    Patjade  almost 3 years ago

    Swing and a miss.

     •  Reply
  27. G0440857
    Rise22  almost 3 years ago

    What are the Democrats so afraid of? You need to have an ID for many things, and voting should be one of the top reasons. Claiming poor/minorities can’t get ID is very, very racist, insulting and demeaning. What a joke the Dems have become!!!

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    imbas5511  almost 3 years ago

    Right on the target Kelley.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    ferddo  almost 3 years ago

    TX Republicans now want to arrest all of those Democrats when they return… they don’t realize that if those Democrats are all in jail then the Republicans still don’t have a quorum for passing their bills…

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    kentmarx36  almost 3 years ago

    Well, this confirms it… Kelly’s last brain cell has flickered and gone out. SAD… SAD… SAD.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    KarenLaRae Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    All states with mail in voting require matching signatures. The laws they are proposing are SIGNFICANTLY more draconian.

     •  Reply
  32. Xp patch jpeg crop
    jack666 Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    The Texas legislature has a filibuster rule that makes it impossible for anyone to prevent the vote for more than, perhaps, 24 hours. Republicans would never allow such a filibuster rule in a body where they do not have a majority.

     •  Reply
  33. Unnamed
    Another Take  almost 3 years ago

    What cheating? None was found that would’ve affected the outcome. I believe in some cases, the cheating benefitted the Orange Buffoon. So maybe Republicans should take a step back on this.

     •  Reply
  34. Fighting irish hood auto decal 2000x
    ndblackirish97  almost 3 years ago

    Steve, you’re leaving out the stuff in the bill that is actually what TX Dems is calling “voting suppression”: elimination of drop boxes, making ballot harvesting more difficult or illegal, empowering partisan poll watchers over election site officials, monthly purges from voter registration rolls, criminalizing a non-citizen accidentally registering to vote even if they never actually vote, banning extended hours during early voting, placing limits on who can can assist voters at polls or with mail in voting, etc. Thankfully they were able to force the removal of provisions like restricted voting on Sundays and allowing local election officials to overturn results without sufficient evidence of fraud. For all the claims that 2020 was such a secure election and Texas hasn’t proved any widespread fraud; what are GOP concerned about? Answer: the huge voter turnout that will continue in 2022 and 2024.

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    jaypem  almost 3 years ago

    Let’s hear your cheering Liberals, “America last! America Last”! Despicable!

     •  Reply
  36. Vitruvian small
    Graphicsdog  almost 3 years ago

    One word for you Kelley… Gerrymandering!

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    DenO Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    I am so tired of this debate. Voter ID for everyone. Period.

     •  Reply
  38. Anger
    grumpypophobart  almost 3 years ago

    So now Kelley, if you can, turn your ‘talent’ to telling us in a cartoon, that since the last election has been proven time and again to have been, in the words of his own AG, Bill Barr, “The justice department has found no proof to back President Donald Trump’s claims of fraud in the 2020 election”, why the GQP NEED to change what is a lot more than mere identification issues. This is one of your own Steve, selected by your ‘Dear Leader’. Do you not trust him either? I know I don’t, nor do I trust those who slavishly follow him, or the party he has hijacked.

     •  Reply
  39. X
    freshmeet2030  almost 3 years ago

    The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.

    200 years ago, steve kelley would have agreed with the southern slaveholders because it was “the law”. What a maroon.

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    goodspkr  almost 3 years ago

    I know the Democrats talking points, but what are your real objections to the current proposed law? Who and how will lose their right to vote?

     •  Reply
  41. Benfranklin
    Bill.Franklin  almost 3 years ago

    Well… yea. I never saw it like that. Good point.

    I’ve noticed Democrats are more of a ‘do as I say, not as I do’ kind of social fascist. It was funny seeing all of them on that plain without masks.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment