Tank McNamara by Bill Hinds for March 06, 2021

  1. Rainbow phoenix   wide
    Ravenswing  about 3 years ago

    Players under contract were demanding trades a century ago. Eeeesh.

     •  Reply
  2. Rays
    TampaFanatic1  about 3 years ago

    Seems to work for the Jets and the Lions as far as being consistently bad. However, cheer up Jet and Lion fans, if Buffalo, Tampa and Cleveland can find their way out of the abyss, anything is possible….

     •  Reply
  3. 20211101 125120
    scote1379 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Your pick, Buying a big name for Huge $ ( then getting low return ) or selling a mediocre player for big $ and a few trades.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    gokar RLV  about 3 years ago

    Never see them giving the money back after a crappy season. Millionaires suck!

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    timbob2313 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    When management can fire players even tho they have a contract, then players should have the same rights as management

     •  Reply
  6. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  about 3 years ago

    Nobody reads their contracts anymore.

     •  Reply
  7. 75mssne
    tygrkhat40  about 3 years ago

    “Don’t contracts mean anything anymore?”

    When did contracts mean anything? For many years, a sporting contract was just a form of paid indentured servitude. Contracts never expired, there was always option years, so a team could extend the contract. Unless the team wanted the contract to expire, then bye-bye. Then there was the tacit agreement that you didn’t sign someone else’s free agents. That’s what helped lead to the AFL-NFL merger. The Bills let K Pete Gogolak’s contract expire. The New York Giants signed Gogolak, which AFL Commissioner Al Davis took as an act of war.

    Contracts are worth the paper they are printed on. The last time I bought printer paper, I bought 2 reams for $10. That’s a penny a page.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    andyboda  about 3 years ago

    It seems that the same sports pundits who habitually bitch about a “lack of loyalty” or “He has a contract, he should honor it” are equally supportive of teams like the WFC dumping the NFL’s comeback player of the year and the Belichick method of “use them and dump them contract be damned” because they are just economic decisions.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    royq27  about 3 years ago
    Actually, I believe they are discussing the Pirates.
     •  Reply
  10. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  about 3 years ago

    Our team is buying back, at a discount, our World Series players they traded off.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Bruce388  about 3 years ago

    Conversations in NFL GMs’ offices: “Let’s see now… You’re 30, getting older… Here’s a pay cut. Take the cut or get cut.”

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    bigal666  about 3 years ago

    Remember the movie “Money Ball”?

     •  Reply
  13. Fritz helm
    BlueKnight1966  about 3 years ago

    Cleveland?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    JoeMartinFan Premium Member about 3 years ago

    It’s just payback for decades of owners buying and selling players at will without the players’ consent or input.

     •  Reply
  15. 06 us2c ue24
    Sailor46 USN 65-95  about 3 years ago

    You can demand anything, granting the demand is what gives them the power.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Tank McNamara