Michael Ramirez for April 18, 2023

  1. Missing large
    aristoclesplato9  about 1 year ago

    And you can bet they are coming for you. The rich continue to have the means to have lawyers and CPAs handle the IRS.

    You middle class folks are just raw meat to the IRS.

     •  Reply
  2. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member about 1 year ago

    How about the IRS having computers which aren’t coal-fired? How about enough IRS agents to be able to ensure even the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share?

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    DangerMan  about 1 year ago

    The IRS needs a lot of money, not only to catch cheaters who deliberately file complicated returns that are expensive to audit (getting just money ALREADY OWED could pay to end hunger in America), they also need to upgrade 1970s vintage equipment, and end the long backlog of paper returns that have not been processed. I saw this and have been waiting to share it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/interactive/2022/irs-pipeline-tax-return-delays/

     •  Reply
  4. Image
    Olddog1  about 1 year ago

    The 87,000 “agents” aren’t all for audits. A lot of them are needed to answer the phone, provide information, transcribe paper returns and handle clerical and support work. Not, as some congress man said “to break down your door with AK-15s (sic).

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    suzalee  about 1 year ago

    Super rich Republicans are screaming because the IRS might have enough employees to audit their complicated tax reforms which are deliberately complex so they can get out of paying what they really owe.

     •  Reply
  6. Homoerectus
    fusilier  about 1 year ago

    If you haven’t cheated on your taxes, then you don’t have to worry, right Mr. Ramirez?

    fusilier

    James 2:24

     •  Reply
  7. 7bf81e16 8ef8 4134 8774 9ce680cc41b6
    The Nodding Head  about 1 year ago

    I don’t like paying taxes any more than anyone else, but I resent that so many are able to subvert the rules and evade their full obligation through loopholes, trickery, and lies. I cannot afford the staff to allow me such unfair advantages. The police have to ticket a Rolls for speeding just as they would ticket me.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    davidthoms1  about 1 year ago

    Michael! You should know by now that repeating a lie does not make it true! Replacing retirees does not equal releasing hordes of auditors to ravage the public!

     •  Reply
  9. Catinma
    BeniHanna6 Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Good thing the newer generations don’t peruse the news, I doubt if they would get The Birds reference.

     •  Reply
  10. Pogo
    We has seen the enemy  about 1 year ago

    I’ve read that the net result is to replace agents who quit/retired. No real net gain.

     •  Reply
  11. Cigar smoker
    Jack7528  about 1 year ago

    Don’t see Rod Taylor, great Alfred Hitchcock reference.

     •  Reply
  12. Picture
    ChristopherBurns  about 1 year ago

    OMG! THE HORROR! I might actually call the IRS and NOT be on hold for an hour! People will have a harder time getting away with tax fraud! Think of the lawyers! They will have to work so much harder to shield the rich from paying their dues!

    Grover Norquist might cry…
     •  Reply
  13. 750a5be89e5492a6a79cdd5442eb47d9371b0b836689298121981f62979e5eac
    hooglah  about 1 year ago

    Just another way to arm the government. does anyone really think we need 87,000 new, armed, IRS agents? Give me a break! A flat tax with no deductions would eliminate the need for any new agents and eliminate the need for 75% of the ones we have. Very simple. Throw in term limits for Congress and we have our Country back.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    piper_gilbert  about 1 year ago

    Now, I know Ramirez is full of it. The 87,000 IRS hires is actually 86,852 for all full-time employees over the course of a decade not solely enforcement agents. Mike is just spreading Republican scary rhetoric also known as BS.

     •  Reply
  15. Database download 512
    jader3rd  about 1 year ago

    I for one want the IRS to be more efficient with top of the line systems.

     •  Reply
  16. 18199310 794855490678998 297509042221646966 n clipped rev 1
    ShadowMaster  about 1 year ago

    Oh for—they aren’t all going to be added at once, it is over what, at least 10 years or so?

     •  Reply
  17. Img 1102 joe cool cropped
    john.horvath  about 1 year ago

    It’s about time. Freedom isn’t free.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    casonia2  about 1 year ago

    Well, well, the The Weak, White, Sell-Out Male is back. Evidently you make over $400K a year, so it is hard to feel sorry for you. Won’t be seeing you in church because church members are not supposed to lie like rugs.

     •  Reply
  19. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Back in the ’50s, when interstates and bridges were being built, ground breaking research being funded, etc., when America was actually considered great, people, especially corporations and the rich paid a much higher portion of income as taxes.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    rlaker22j  about 1 year ago

    they are not coming for me I pay my taxes how about you

     •  Reply
  21. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member about 1 year ago

    It continues to amaze that the Republicans who comment here somehow believe that extremely wealthy people and patriotic multinational corporations paying a small to no percentage of their income somehow benefits them personally.

    And they also believe that a flat tax would apply to everyone equally and there would be NO preferential tax treatment for those same people and corporations that get that preferential treatment now.

    .

    They also deny that wealth inequality has steadily increased over the last 40 years and refuse to look at the data.

    .

    And they cannot comment on the issue of taxes without including LIEs.

     •  Reply
  22. Green 5 point celtic knot 300
    Erse IS better  about 1 year ago

    Just pointing out that this is NOT 87k new jobs. It’s REPLACEMENT for the folks who have been laid off by repug (mostly) admins and those who are or will soon retire.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    Rich Douglas  about 1 year ago

    Total misrepresentation. Not 87,000 agents, not coming after you, etc. If you believe this you’re as foolish as Ramirez assumes you are.

     •  Reply
  24. Chimp
    Lou Nattic, né Stan C  about 1 year ago

    Omigod! I am SO scared right now, I could shoot people for being at the wrong address!

     •  Reply
  25. Chimp
    Lou Nattic, né Stan C  about 1 year ago

    Thanks for the lies, pubbies!

     •  Reply
  26. 392945134 10222966427101539 7291125585212099960 n  1
    FJB  Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Here’s the Truth – “The top 1% of taxpayers accounted for more income taxes paid than the bottom 90% combined,” says the Tax Foundation. And it’s not close. “The top 1% of taxpayers paid $723 billion in income taxes while the bottom 90% paid $450 billion.” For the top 1%, that’s 42% of the taxes on 22% of the income. The bottom 50% paid about $39 billion, or about 2.3% in taxes on 10.2% of the income.

     •  Reply
  27. Gcwg
    MC4802 Premium Member about 1 year ago

    simplify the tax code and everyone pays.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    KarenLaRae Premium Member about 1 year ago

    I don’t remember the source … so I can’t verify it … I read an article that the IRS tends to audit middle and upper-middle class citizens because audits of the very wealthy is too time consuming (I assume dealing with tax layers) they don’t have the manpower.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    BillS50  about 1 year ago

    It’s always been about the middle class. That’s where the money is and the lawyers and accountants to defend it aren’t. Any Democrat claims to the contrary are lies and will be proven so by next tax season.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Michael Ramirez