Tom the Dancing Bug by Ruben Bolling for December 16, 2021

  1. Rick and morty 91d86486 2737 4e8f a1ca 8e1b1ed1070d
    sevaar777  over 2 years ago

    Too bad Congress couldn’t have written and pass a law banning Ted Crud(z) from ever returning from Mexico. Then of course, what did Mexico do to deserve HIM coming there in the first place?

     •  Reply
  2. Photo
    Zesty  over 2 years ago

    It took me a minute to remember the name.

    Congress turned into a flash mob to pass a special law to overrule state courts.

    "The Senate approved the measure on a voice vote in a nearly empty chamber Sunday. But some House Democrats blocked an immediate voice vote in that chamber, forcing the House Republican leadership to schedule a roll call at 12:01 a.m. Monday to approve the bill.

    “In the extraordinary political drama, President Bush cut short a stay at his Texas ranch and raced back to the White House so he could sign the bill as soon as it was passed. Bush and other supporters of the bill hoped to get a speedy federal court decision restoring the feeding tube that has kept Schiavo alive for 15 years.”

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    WaitingMan  over 2 years ago

    Justice Scalia actually voted with the majority on the ruling that made burning the American Flag a constitutionally protected right. Stinkin’ Commie.

     •  Reply
  4. Sixshotprofile
    Decepticomic  over 2 years ago

    Pretty sure that congress (or any successful politician really) doesn’t give a rat’s damn about the needs of local townsfolk.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    awcoffman  over 2 years ago

    Congress only drafts and enacts federal legislation for people with money. And that’s because money can be used to convince local townsfolk to vote against their own interests.

     •  Reply
  6. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Just yesterday I came across discussion of a Supreme Court decision where I actually agreed with Scalia’s dissent!

    The relevant statute (18 U.S. Code § 924©(1)) reads “[A]ny person who … uses or carries a firearm [in the course of committing a crime of violence or drug trafficking], shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime … be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years.”

    In the appeal Smith vs United States (1993), appellant Smith received the five extra years on his drug-possession sentence, because he had traded his gun for the cocaine. Does this count as “use of a firearm” in the commission of a crime? The majority held that it did; Scalia dissented, and I agree with him.

    I was stunned.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    gamblercooper  over 2 years ago

    So why don’t they include the Senate?

     •  Reply
  8. Images
    banjoAhhh!   over 2 years ago

    The good justice looks like the Godfather from the Scorece (sic) Godfather films.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Tom the Dancing Bug