Wizard of Id by Parker and Hart for April 02, 2020

  1. Missing large
    littlejohn Premium Member about 4 years ago

    But at least you got a “hole in one”.

     •  Reply
  2. Gocomicsluna2
    Leojim  about 4 years ago

    No you fool, you built the trebuchet to short!

     •  Reply
  3. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  about 4 years ago

    Give it a high arc next time.

    Oh, and your walls are too thin.

     •  Reply
  4. Photo
    VincentGoudreault  about 4 years ago

    Why is it “fire” when no fire is involved? Shouldn’t it be “launch”?

     •  Reply
  5. Large bryanfarht
    Bryan Farht  about 4 years ago

    I still think it’s China’s fault for sending a catapult that’s too small. Wasn’t the “m” for the millions of people who would fall at impact? /s

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    kenshively  about 4 years ago

    Back it up about 4 meters and it should clear the wall…

     •  Reply
  7. Picture 001
    rshive  about 4 years ago

    And it leaves a hole just big enough for a Hun to crawl through.

     •  Reply
  8. Comics 2022
    Meg: All Seriousness Aside  about 4 years ago

    Listen to the science, shorty.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatar 2475
    Troglodyte  about 4 years ago

    Back to the firing range…

     •  Reply
  10. Fb img 1516982044221
    jagedlo  about 4 years ago

    You figured that someone would have had the sense to test this out BEFORE the war started!

     •  Reply
  11. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  about 4 years ago

    Somethings gotta give….wooooosh

     •  Reply
  12. Photo
    DaveQuinn  about 4 years ago

    Had the Fink made the arm of the catapult longer and farther away from the wall, the payload may have cleared the top of it as the arc of the trajectory would have been higher.

     •  Reply
  13. Harvey  2
    Pohka  about 4 years ago

    Build a platform for the catapult. And rather than using an onager a trebuchet would clear your wall, have better range, and faster reload time.

     •  Reply
  14. Death from above reduced size
    donwestonmysteries  about 4 years ago

    Back it up 30 feet.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    prabbit237  about 4 years ago

    To all those saying “move it back some”, that wouldn’t help at all. The arm ends in a vertical position, meaning the projectile would always go straight out horizontally (actually, it’d curve downwards but the curve would start with a zero-vertical vector.) You need to have the arm stop when it’s approx a 45-degree angle leaning backwards to get the most range (that, of course, discounts any angular acceleration it may still be making at the time. So maybe about 35-40 degrees before the vertical may wind up with more range. But anything before the 45 would give more height but less horizontal range.)

     •  Reply
  16. Img 1610
    WCraft Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Well, now that you have a projectile window, you can start using “live” ammunition: cows and peasants.

     •  Reply
  17. Airbender
    Airbender  about 4 years ago

    Next time, don’t use the " Toulouse-Lautrec" model.

     •  Reply
  18. Avatar92
    Charlie Fogwhistle  about 4 years ago

    The next round should achieve greater velocity and a longer range.

     •  Reply
  19. Fritz helm
    BlueKnight1966  about 4 years ago

    Poorly chosen angle of launch. Even a half decent engineer could have worked that out.

     •  Reply
  20. 06 us2c ue24
    Sailor46 USN 65-95  about 4 years ago

    Maybe if you just move a little further back from the wall.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    krisannr.thompson  about 4 years ago

    This is not a time to sacrifice ROCKS on OUR Gddess (called Mother Earth) that people need to give a CRAP about?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Wizard of Id