I read this thread on his Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/pg/berkeleybreathed/photos/?ref=page_internal) and don’t know why Steve ended up in jail when what’s-her-name had signed the agreement to not accuse him of anything when they were in the bar.
The message is still evolving…
This is like the game of “Telephone”. That sentence changes each time it is brought up. Next time, should there be one, I hope Steve says, “Would you be so kind as to send the peanuts my way?” Less probability of mis-hearing. Probably.
What kind of self-respecting cad would refer to his junk as “peanuts”?
Yes, Steve. your oafishness has always been more Clintonian.
He should have said “Pardon me, I’m nuts.”
Trump just would have grabbed her by the p….
To be fair, the legal preparations for the request did provide expectation that it would be considered offensive.
I’ll file an appeal for ya’, Steve … or at least an amicus brief.
A new phrase! “Trumpian oafishness.” OH, how we’ve needed this. It is a phrase for the ages (I"m afraid.)
He lost the judge at Panel One. No self-respecting judge would ever interrupt a confession.
Next time, put the request in writing.
Poor Steve. Between his prior reputation and a noisy bar, he’s on his way to Gitmo.
A couple of months in the Slam will do Steve some good, maybe. and us more, maybe. He could learn how to hotwire a car, make a toothbrush into a shank, or where to hire a hitman (I know a guy who knows a guy). We could use a respite from vague “nutty” jokes….
Maybe Steve should have offered her something more in line with SNL’s “Junk in a Box”.
It doesn’t matter what any ‘he’ says, It’s what any ‘she’ feels. She is a victim, He is the villain.