Then Tiffany and Bets are peas in a pod, as Tiffany ran over what Bets wanted. What Tiffany did here was bad business practice. Tiffany had every right to refuse to do what Bets wanted, she had no right to substitute what she wanted to do for what Bets wanted.
It is not unreasonable of Tiffany to not want to accommodate Bets mini costume party if she refused the job. Accepting it and not giving Bets what she wanted is the foul.
There was an offer of $300 dollars by Bets, and a verbal agreement is a contract when conducting business.
The point is, Tiffany knew what Bets wanted and did not provide it. Not because it was unreasonable, but merely because she did not want to do it. That is bad customer service. She should have refused to do the event.
Then Tiffany and Bets are peas in a pod, as Tiffany ran over what Bets wanted. What Tiffany did here was bad business practice. Tiffany had every right to refuse to do what Bets wanted, she had no right to substitute what she wanted to do for what Bets wanted.