We have all seen and heard the decisions SCOTUS has handed down over the last couple of years, landmark decisions, and the severe impact these decisions have had on the rights of some citizens.. We’ve seen some of the repressive laws some States have passed over the last tear or so. I’m predicting, as a sort of kick-back to Trump, and the GOP putting them on SCOTUS in the first place, they will declare Trump completely immune to any prosecution whatsoever, to be applied retroactively from his loss in the 2020 Presidential election. That will be the death knell for Democracy,
She well knows what her job is: protect her patron at all costs by following the advice of an experienced Federalist Society whisperer in order to make life easy for Trump’s defense of a crime he should already bein jail for. In return, the undying appreciation of Trump’s billionaire benefactors showering her with exclusive vacations that she no doubt will “forget” to report until she’s caught out…and possibly a promise to give her Thomas’s seat to ensure the corruption of SCOTUS continues.
Aren’t the plutocrats afraid that the bribes they’re promising Cannon will make Clarence jealous? He might demand to renegotiate the “understanding” he has with them.
Lawyer here. Even giving her the most benefit of the doubt (not saying she deserves it), if she can’t handle the workload of the case, it needs to be assigned to a different judge. You get on the bench, you gotta timely deal with the Motions before you, difficult or not. If you can’t handle it, the ethical thing to do is ask for a reassignment of the case.
Judge Cannon may have just given Jack Smith an excuse to replace her: Watergate prosecutor
The Florida judge overseeing Donald Trump’s criminal documents case may have just given the prosecution an excuse to take action, a former Watergate prosecutor said on Saturday.
Further, she said, the American public has a “right to a speedy trial.”
“She is not dumb, but she is really not doing her job,” she said, adding that for judges it is part “of their jobs is to set a trial date.”
“So her saying this is too complex a case, I’m not going to set a trial date, that seems to be something that could be subject to a mandamus,” she added. “And that may mean that getting a new judge would be delaying the case, but I would rather delay it for a new judge and not worry.”
How was the decision made in the first place that she’d be the judge to hear this particular case? There were many to choose from, weren’t there? And yet it fell to someone who owed her very livelihood to the accused party. Did it dawn on nobody that there might just possibly be a little conflict of interest there? Suppose somebody had suggested that Hillary Clinton should sit on the jury. Would THAT have escaped everyone’s attention, too?
moosemin about 1 month ago
This is our two-tiered Justice system! He appointed her, and he’s getting away with it.
William Bednar Premium Member about 1 month ago
We have all seen and heard the decisions SCOTUS has handed down over the last couple of years, landmark decisions, and the severe impact these decisions have had on the rights of some citizens.. We’ve seen some of the repressive laws some States have passed over the last tear or so. I’m predicting, as a sort of kick-back to Trump, and the GOP putting them on SCOTUS in the first place, they will declare Trump completely immune to any prosecution whatsoever, to be applied retroactively from his loss in the 2020 Presidential election. That will be the death knell for Democracy,
GOGOPOWERANGERS about 1 month ago
Ec: No
pasharuzam Premium Member about 1 month ago
She well knows what her job is: protect her patron at all costs by following the advice of an experienced Federalist Society whisperer in order to make life easy for Trump’s defense of a crime he should already bein jail for. In return, the undying appreciation of Trump’s billionaire benefactors showering her with exclusive vacations that she no doubt will “forget” to report until she’s caught out…and possibly a promise to give her Thomas’s seat to ensure the corruption of SCOTUS continues.
lopaka about 1 month ago
Loose Cannon for lease?
phritzg Premium Member about 1 month ago
Aren’t the plutocrats afraid that the bribes they’re promising Cannon will make Clarence jealous? He might demand to renegotiate the “understanding” he has with them.
Hello Everyone about 1 month ago
She should be sitting in tRump’s Lap!
Godfreydaniel about 1 month ago
Since she is licking Traitor Trump’s boots and kissing Traitor Trump’s azz, THAT is how she should be pictured.
thatperlakyguy about 1 month ago
Lawyer here. Even giving her the most benefit of the doubt (not saying she deserves it), if she can’t handle the workload of the case, it needs to be assigned to a different judge. You get on the bench, you gotta timely deal with the Motions before you, difficult or not. If you can’t handle it, the ethical thing to do is ask for a reassignment of the case.
rs0204 Premium Member about 1 month ago
The judge is either corrupt or she is incompetent. It’s a binary choice, just like the election this November.
piper_gilbert about 1 month ago
The world is watching, and she is fooling no one.
akachman Premium Member about 1 month ago
She is sitting in the spot she has chosen. Kick this fraud off the bench.
Cerabooge about 1 month ago
Justice delayed is justice denied.
Tarzan & Redd Panda about 1 month ago
People are funny, that dirtbag judge repects trump but has no respect for herself. She’s gonna find out what a Jonah trump is.
Seems bannon is bound for jail, but it’s rich white guy’s jail and only for 4 months. Maybe a Motel-6 with no cable?
ragsarooni Premium Member about 1 month ago
Not if she is gonna be kissing his a$$‼️
Ally2005 about 1 month ago
T is always in need of a “favor” from his rumper judges and the SCOTUS six T a$$ kissers.
nednewbie about 1 month ago
Is Jack Smith going to turn out to be another Mueller?
Radish the wordsmith about 1 month ago
All Trump appointed judges are totally corrupt.
Radish the wordsmith about 1 month ago
Judge Cannon may have just given Jack Smith an excuse to replace her: Watergate prosecutor
The Florida judge overseeing Donald Trump’s criminal documents case may have just given the prosecution an excuse to take action, a former Watergate prosecutor said on Saturday.
Further, she said, the American public has a “right to a speedy trial.”
“She is not dumb, but she is really not doing her job,” she said, adding that for judges it is part “of their jobs is to set a trial date.”
“So her saying this is too complex a case, I’m not going to set a trial date, that seems to be something that could be subject to a mandamus,” she added. “And that may mean that getting a new judge would be delaying the case, but I would rather delay it for a new judge and not worry.”
Joe1962 Premium Member about 1 month ago
1st Jack Smith should have never brought these case to trail.
ncorgbl about 1 month ago
She should be impeached.
Richard S Russell Premium Member about 1 month ago
Musta been a little mixup in the translator, because clearly the quotation should’ve been “Judge Cannon, you shouldn’t sit there.”
Richard S Russell Premium Member about 1 month ago
How was the decision made in the first place that she’d be the judge to hear this particular case? There were many to choose from, weren’t there? And yet it fell to someone who owed her very livelihood to the accused party. Did it dawn on nobody that there might just possibly be a little conflict of interest there? Suppose somebody had suggested that Hillary Clinton should sit on the jury. Would THAT have escaped everyone’s attention, too?
Direwolf about 1 month ago
like Trump, not just corrupt but stupidly so. she doesn’t even pretend to be unbiased.
pamela welch Premium Member about 1 month ago
Frighteningly accurate Mike :-(
Rich Douglas about 1 month ago
Metaphorically spot-on.
vwmdabbler75 about 1 month ago
Impeach cannon!
FreyjaRN Premium Member about 1 month ago
She makes me ill.
Foxcarver Premium Member about 1 month ago
This seems to have struck a nerve. People ARE paying attention after all. Good.
My First Premium Member about 1 month ago
You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink. Just like you can show a liberal the truth, but you can’t make him think. Right Duracell?