Jen Sorensen for September 06, 2022

  1. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 1 year ago

    It’s good business to find the controversy in the speech, but it was a speech that needed to shake us up. This is a fight for the soul of our country, and the right-wing forces of darkness are relentless.

     •  Reply
  2. 92131731 10214180593663282 3751105281048707072 n
    B 8671  over 1 year ago

    Jen Sorensen, the newest republican owned slave!

     •  Reply
  3. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member over 1 year ago

    And yet the repubs will still take offence to it.

     •  Reply
  4. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The number of Republicans supporting Herr Groppenfuror over the Republican party has jumped in the past few months according to a Yahoo poll. President Biden’s speech was timely.

     •  Reply
  5. Flag for ukraine 1f1fa 1f1e6
    eclairewl Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The kind of speech that would please the republicans, vague forgetful, and weak.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    wrd2255  over 1 year ago

    Fuggit. . Critics would have called this version of his speech divisive. He needed to take the gloves off. To the diehards, Joe can do no right, and TFG no wrong. And the media is largely Bothsiderism.

     •  Reply
  7. Wtp
    superposition  over 1 year ago

    There was a time when news media was an uncompromising honest ethical source of valid information, not just a profit center trying to be entertaining and politically biased in all output, not just clearly identified editorial slots.

     •  Reply
  8. Avt freyjaw nurse48
    FreyjaRN Premium Member over 1 year ago

    I’m not impressed.

     •  Reply
  9. Rustfungus2a
    Cerabooge  over 1 year ago

    “MAGA” people are a handy excuse for doubling down on the police state, and railing against “election deniers”. But ask yourself this: How would a Biden administration respond to the protests against the Supreme Court selecting the president in 2000? Or protests against the election theft in Ohio in 2004? Or protests against the illegal destruction of the ballots in a DWS election? Or analyses of the black-box voting and tabulation machines?

    I’m fine with responding (finally) to the fascism and lunacy proudly displayed by Republicans, but I don’t think Republican politicians are the real target. Democrats or Republicans, the “security state” strengthens its hold.

     •  Reply
  10. Froggy with cat ears
    willie_mctell  over 1 year ago

    I thought last week’s speech went over well in the press. “Semi-fascist” was the only euphemism. He should channel Truman more.

     •  Reply
  11. Images
    banjoAhhh!   over 1 year ago

    The “mainstream press” is owned by various millionaires, i.e. Bozos owns the Washington Post.The idea that the press is “balanced” is a joke. The press is very happy to become unbalanced if something benefits benefits the owners, to preserve their wealth and power. Examples: reagan (aka “it”) began his campaign in Philadelphia MS, where the 3 civil rights workers were murdered. They also only reported once that he was endorsed by the KKK. Golly gosh gee. If they couldn’t see the obvious racial hatred he was promoting as a reason to vote for him, it’s because they wanted him in office. Another example was Dan Rather being fired for reporting that Dubya joined the national guard to avoid service in Vietnam, but he reported for duty to the National Guard only very few times. The problem is, Rather was reporting the truth. A book by the extemmed political scientist, Kevin Philip

     •  Reply
  12. 704fe3d1 4a7d 495f a742 2d8456861f60
    admiree2  over 1 year ago

    Sorensen, this missed-it-badly toon will only work for MAGAts. They didn’t listen to the speech either.

     •  Reply
  13. Images
    banjoAhhh!   over 1 year ago

    the esteemed political scientist,Kevin Philips in (either American Theocracy or American Dynasty.) devoted at least a chapter in his book to Dubya’s service avoiding scam. Again the “mainstream press” wanted to protect their own.

     •  Reply
  14. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 1 year ago

    I think it worked just fine. I, for one, am glad that Biden stood up and drew the line in the sand. We’re not talking about “honest differences of opinion here,” we’re talking about Americans and people trying to overthrow the government for the benefit of one criminal man.

    And yet some people are still afraid that the Democratic Party isn’t being “nice” enough to seditionists and traitors!

    According to the Constitution (you know, that document with the Second Amendment in it), anyone participating in treasonous activity is forbidden from holding public office. The first person actually dismissed in a CENTURY for that reason is in New Mexico, as of today, removed from office because he participated in the January 6th riot. This could be applied to any number of serving Republicans who are sharing in the “Big Lie.”

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    estes.house.account  over 1 year ago

    It doesn’t work for me either. The accusation of being bland and uninformed iis totally wrong. How many people realize we are in a shadow war with Russia. With all that’s going on I think Biden is doing a great job

     •  Reply
  16. Img 20161216 212459
    Nancy Simpson  over 1 year ago

    Nothing vague about Trump stowing another country’s nuclear Intel at his golf course/cathouse/cemetery.

     •  Reply
  17. Face resize
    donut reply  over 1 year ago

    I see all political speeches as being like this. There is a book written in between the lines.

     •  Reply
  18. Img 20161216 212459
    Nancy Simpson  over 1 year ago

    Meanwhile, the Russians are withdrawing from Ukraine.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Jen Sorensen