Off course this will be largely ignored by the rightwingnuts because facts don’t matter to them. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
All this and the republigoons, their sycophants/apply and their slaves/servants ignore what the very first American dictator wannabe,the fuhrer wannabe, herr Trump did to damage this country!
“If a Democrat is being investigated, she or he must be guilty or they would not be investigated. If a republican is proven guilty, it’s lying political attack.”
Kelly’s understanding of a court filing from Trump-appointed “special” counsel John Durham and his imaginary investigations into distracting away from Trump and his increasing number of felonies.
MontatnaBill, clearly someone did something that was at the least unethical. It wasn’t Clinton and it wasn’t “hacking” trumps computers. Now can you admit that Jan 6th was an attempt at sedition, overthrowing a valid election? Let’s get things in perspective.
Neither Durham nor the “Durham report” ever said such a thing. I wonder what would happen if he sued Kelley (and others) for libel. Unlike Palin with the New York Times, I suspect that deliberate malice could be proven.
I wish there were some way to administer negative consequences to RWNJ influencers like Steve Kelley, who is either too incompetent to grasp what actually occurred in this instance (nothing communicated by the ‘toon literally took place) or deliberately misleads his credulous conservative audience as an act of cynical manipulation.
The first scenario admits a bit of leeway for mental incapacity, the second is simply insane to a degree — the degree of the insanity measured in proportion to negative societal/national/world outcomes Kelly and other RWNJ “influencers” succeed in creating.
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORTA recent filing in one of two cases stemming from special counsel John Durham’s investigation spawned a flurry of false and misleading claims from pro-Trump pundits.
Durham has charged an attorney linked to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign with making a false statement to the FBI. The filing added new details about a 2017 meeting between the attorney and the CIA. It alleged that the attorney relayed concerns raised by another client, a technology executive, about internet traffic data from servers associated with the White House and Donald Trump’s business.
Durham’s filing never alleged what Watters falsely claimed: that Clinton paid hackers to spy on Donald Trump before and during his presidency, break into his computers, and then fraudulently frame him for colluding with Russia.
CONSPIRACY THEORIESYOU’LL NEVER BELIEVE IT BUT HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT, IN FACT, SPY ON TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSEIn less breaking news, Donald Trump remains a moron.
There are predictions that the case against Sussmann will be thrown out before it goes anywhere because of poor investigation on Durham’s part. It is much ado about nothing burgers.
It’s interesting how the reports attacking Hillary seem to show up at the most opportune moments. I’m no fan of hers, but it must be getting crowded in a RWNJ’s head. :-D
Say What Now‽ Premium Member about 2 years ago
Off course this will be largely ignored by the rightwingnuts because facts don’t matter to them. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
Daeder about 2 years ago
No he wasn’t.
But Kelley never lets a trifling thing like reality get in his way.
B 8671 about 2 years ago
All this and the republigoons, their sycophants/apply and their slaves/servants ignore what the very first American dictator wannabe,the fuhrer wannabe, herr Trump did to damage this country!
RAGs about 2 years ago
“If a Democrat is being investigated, she or he must be guilty or they would not be investigated. If a republican is proven guilty, it’s lying political attack.”
Radish the wordsmith about 2 years ago
You guys are nuts.
LookingGlass Premium Member about 2 years ago
YAWN!! SNOOZE!! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
/SHEESH/
Concretionist about 2 years ago
The facts are, of course, undeniably foreign to Skelley et al.
hermit48 about 2 years ago
And they consume another heaping helping. At this rate we’re going to have a fertilizer shortage this spring.
Patjade about 2 years ago
SKelley also falls prey to the debunked narrative put out by Fox and Fiends.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/durham-court-filing-doesn-t-say-hillary-clinton-spied-trump-n1289097
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/16/fox-newss-durham-narrative-survives-emergence-inconvenient-details/
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/14/politics/durham-sussmann-filing/index.html
How many indictments? One lawyer with one count of lying to the FBI about giving information to the CIA.
BubbleTape Premium Member about 2 years ago
Except that it isn’t true and no actual evidence has been presented.
Durak Premium Member about 2 years ago
SKelley can’t even tell you what “hacked” means.
superposition about 2 years ago
Is this just another “Republican” loyalty test lie to attempt deflection from the presidential paper’s crime?
Stephen Runnels Premium Member about 2 years ago
Kelly’s understanding of a court filing from Trump-appointed “special” counsel John Durham and his imaginary investigations into distracting away from Trump and his increasing number of felonies.
A Whiz about 2 years ago
Trump was right, again.
The Nodding Head about 2 years ago
Didn’t Hillary also start World War III?
Sgt. Snorkle about 2 years ago
Republicans are trying to advert attention to this? They are nuts!
brit-ed about 2 years ago
No they were not. No hacking was done to Trump or white house computers. You are either a techno-idiot or deliberately lying.
Redd Panda about 2 years ago
Or maybe not. I’m going to believe what I want, ignore the rest.
William Bednar Premium Member about 2 years ago
Looks like S. Kelly loves wasting ink.
davidthoms1 about 2 years ago
More willful stupidity! Kelly assumes Republicans don’t read. Well he is probably right about the Trumpist faction.
Kilrwat Premium Member about 2 years ago
I love @MontanaBill’s reports from the UpsideDown!
brit-ed about 2 years ago
MontatnaBill, clearly someone did something that was at the least unethical. It wasn’t Clinton and it wasn’t “hacking” trumps computers. Now can you admit that Jan 6th was an attempt at sedition, overthrowing a valid election? Let’s get things in perspective.
Arthur I Romeo Premium Member about 2 years ago
Too bad’ so sad.
BB71 about 2 years ago
Maybe Durham should investigate the 2020 election. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
jhayesd31 about 2 years ago
If Durham had legitimate charges he would have made indictments.
gammaguy about 2 years ago
Neither Durham nor the “Durham report” ever said such a thing. I wonder what would happen if he sued Kelley (and others) for libel. Unlike Palin with the New York Times, I suspect that deliberate malice could be proven.
Local 574 Premium Member about 2 years ago
How dare you say that Trump was right about anything.
charliekane about 2 years ago
‘Nother ’toon where somebody didn’t read the fine print. . .
red6235 about 2 years ago
Except that is not what Durham said. So once more into the breach of truth for you.
lsnrchrd.1 Premium Member about 2 years ago
I wish there were some way to administer negative consequences to RWNJ influencers like Steve Kelley, who is either too incompetent to grasp what actually occurred in this instance (nothing communicated by the ‘toon literally took place) or deliberately misleads his credulous conservative audience as an act of cynical manipulation.
The first scenario admits a bit of leeway for mental incapacity, the second is simply insane to a degree — the degree of the insanity measured in proportion to negative societal/national/world outcomes Kelly and other RWNJ “influencers” succeed in creating.
I Play One On TV about 2 years ago
Another example of the War on Truth. Coming to your local school boards any day now.
MuddyUSA Premium Member about 2 years ago
No news media (TV and Print) totally ignored it. Real journalism is dead!
schaefer jim about 2 years ago
Never mind what happen on Jan. 6th.
librarylady59 about 2 years ago
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORTA recent filing in one of two cases stemming from special counsel John Durham’s investigation spawned a flurry of false and misleading claims from pro-Trump pundits.
Durham has charged an attorney linked to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign with making a false statement to the FBI. The filing added new details about a 2017 meeting between the attorney and the CIA. It alleged that the attorney relayed concerns raised by another client, a technology executive, about internet traffic data from servers associated with the White House and Donald Trump’s business.
Durham’s filing never alleged what Watters falsely claimed: that Clinton paid hackers to spy on Donald Trump before and during his presidency, break into his computers, and then fraudulently frame him for colluding with Russia.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/17/jesse-watters/jesse-watters-spins-facts-beyond-recognition-claim/
librarylady59 about 2 years ago
CONSPIRACY THEORIESYOU’LL NEVER BELIEVE IT BUT HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT, IN FACT, SPY ON TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSEIn less breaking news, Donald Trump remains a moron.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-white-house-spying
Jujeebean about 2 years ago
There are predictions that the case against Sussmann will be thrown out before it goes anywhere because of poor investigation on Durham’s part. It is much ado about nothing burgers.
Scoutmaster77 about 2 years ago
It’s interesting how the reports attacking Hillary seem to show up at the most opportune moments. I’m no fan of hers, but it must be getting crowded in a RWNJ’s head. :-D
codak about 2 years ago
who knows what the truth is on this stuff…I think maybe we are being played by BOTH sides…..time for a couple of 3rd parties
Rich Douglas about 2 years ago
Except that her campaign didn’t do that.
Ammo is on a break Premium Member about 2 years ago
It’s coming boys & girls…