Gary Varvel for February 21, 2019

  1. Missing large
    Judge Magney  about 5 years ago

    Another timely warning about the menace of programs like Socialist Security.

     •  Reply
  2. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Do any of these conservative cartoonists have an original idea?

     •  Reply
  3. Triumph
    Daeder  about 5 years ago

    Down with equality! Long live the Kakistocracy!

     •  Reply
  4. Wtp
    superposition  about 5 years ago
    Again I worry more that American capitalism is not sustainable. Because of the of the increasingly high cost of higher education in America many high tech jobs are filled using H1B visas which creates a secondary problem of immigrants illegally overstaying their visas. While the older generations have a muddled idea of socialism, the younger generations suffer under the failing supply-side economics that makes a feeble attempt to monetize, privatize and profitize all aspects of American’s products and services yet does not allow the middle-class wage-earners to share in those profits. Wealth inequity is not allowing the consumers to enjoy the disposable income that they once had and this reduces, not increases the profit and quality of American goods and services. American workers once had the skills to compete with lower labor costs through more innovative manufacturing processes and were able to sustain gainful employment when companies were incentivized to provide training to get tax relief. Without those incentives, America’s workforce is forced to bear the burden of paying their own training costs or accepting lower wage employment brought on by the lower wages of outsourced labor that companies employ to improve profit margins. How much longer this race to the bottom can last is more of a threat than the democratic socialist hybrid economics that other OECD nations employ. If America had a growing GDP and no debt, I might buy Varvel premise, but it simply does not match the real world that most of us live in where we see America falling behind nations the utilize socialism to great advantage. A dictatorship calling itself socialism may fool the older generation but our younger generations are fully aware of the dire deficiencies in American capitalism.
     •  Reply
  5. Atheism15
    INGSOC   about 5 years ago

    Obsolete Sanders will pull through again of running another failure campaign..

     •  Reply
  6. Shakes
    shakeswilly  about 5 years ago

    Varvel, you represent a party that has been hell bent on doing away with all environmental regulations. It’s ironic that you should represent the idea of a more equitable distribution of a nation’s resources as toxic. If it was, the Republican Party would have adopted socialism.

     •  Reply
  7. Homoerectus
    fusilier  about 5 years ago

    Hey, Varvie, we had another sinkhole open up in downtown Indianapolis. I think that’s the third or fourth one in the last six months.

    And it’s all because the pols kept cutting taxes for the businesses, so maintenance didn’t happen.

    fusilier, who doesn’t want to get started on the infant mortality figures in the entire state.

    James 2:24

     •  Reply
  8. De6fdbq 5e0a21ac bc2f 4b76 855c 395d2ca0924d
    NRHAWK Premium Member about 5 years ago

    And once again @alwayswrong demonstrates his utter lack of knowledge and the poor state of our education system. I’ve been to Sweden and other social democracies with no one hungry and no discernable homeless. Better yet is the fact that capitalism thrives in a social democracy.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    walfishj  about 5 years ago

    Poor brainwashed Varvel. He is for corporate socialism, but not for people socialism. He ignores the socialism benefits he receives and wants more tax cuts for the 1 percent. Republican wanna be Varvel.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    preacherman  about 5 years ago

    So far the only ones who benefit from our socialism are the very, very poor and the very, very rich. The rest of us in the middle get the shaft. It’s time to take the rich from the equation.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    WestNYC Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Great toon today.

     •  Reply
  12. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 5 years ago

    1.5 trillion in tax breaks for billionaires.

     •  Reply
  13. Fullsizeoutput 1e
    Pat Towey  about 5 years ago

    Typical.

     •  Reply
  14. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  about 5 years ago

    There are two ways (at least) of thinking about socialism. One way is to look at what socialist theorists have said over the past couple of hundred years; another way is to look at the actual programs of the various socialist parties. There is overlap between the two, but they aren’t identical. First, the theorists. There is a wide variety of different socialist theories, from authoritarian to anarchistic, but I would say the one point they have in common is a class analysis of society, and a belief that the relationship between the classes is adversarial: there will never be an alliance between the classes, and there will always be a struggle between the classes, unless somehow you can create a society without classes. Most socialists (but not all) call for some kind of social ownership of the means of production and natural resources. Social ownership does NOT necessarily mean government ownership. Union ownership, for instance, counts as social ownership. Second, the programs of the parties. Socialist parties have advocated a lot of different programs, mostly on the way towards a socialist society rather than as a full realization of socialism. So, for example, universal health care is not the definition of socialism, but it’s the kind of improvement in society that many socialist parties call for as a practical improvement. Historically socialist parties also called for the eight-hour work day, the elimination of child labor, health and safety regulations for the workplace, the rights of women and minorities, and so on. None of these is exclusive to socialism: many others who are NOT socialists call for the practical improvements socialist parties have promoted. Those who call themselves Democratic Socialists mostly don’t make a big deal of the conflict between the classes, and so they don’t count as real socialists; but they do advocate many of the practical programs socialist also favor.

     •  Reply
  15. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  about 5 years ago

    Those that hope to capitalize on the negative semantic “socialism” for political gain, overlook that the economies of the most successful nations on Earth are partnership between capitalism and socialism – the European Nordic countries, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the USA. According to a United Nations study, the happiest nations on Earth are these same nations, particularly the Nordic countries that are proportionately higher in socialism. In the U.S., some of the most transformational development projects in its history were partnerships between public and private enterprise – the Pacific Railway, the Hoover Dam, the Interstate Highway System, etc, etc, etc. The Hoover Dam, which electrifies the arid Southwest and makes possible large cities like Las Vegas is owned by the U.S. Government.

     •  Reply
  16. Img 0048
    Nantucket Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Here is a “socialist” program that had fantastic success – Utah reduced chronic homelessness by 91%

    https://www.npr.org/2015/12/10/459100751/utah-reduced-chronic-homelessness-by-91-percent-heres-how

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    JHayes  about 5 years ago

    Lest just say Socialism every day for the next 18 months.

    The current system is putting us in debt to the tune of 2 trillion dollars a year, but Bernie’s Socialism is the enemy of the American economy.

     •  Reply
  18. Ab avitar
    Addled Brain  about 5 years ago

    This cartoon is a sure sign of fear.

     •  Reply
  19. 17c2adb2 edfb 4a2c 8c43 14a8ac78c844
    Tempus Fugit Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Good to see that Gary reads Lisa’sposts.

     •  Reply
  20. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member about 5 years ago

    You’d have a line of business leaders huffing on that tail pipe fighting for their share of corporate welfare. Well over $100 billion annually, not sure if that includes both federal and state/local subsidies.

     •  Reply
  21. Photo
    VadimUzdensky1  about 5 years ago

    Healthcare, retirement, and education are not “stuff”! I would like all conservatives to stop calling it that. For goodness’ sake, people DIE when they cannot afford healthcare. They cannot achieve their full potential and fully contribute to society without a full education. And they cannot retire without sufficient pensions. And this isn’t even socialism; this is democratic socialism.

     •  Reply
  22. Homoerectus
    fusilier  about 5 years ago

    Dang it, I must be getting old.

    Varvie has never once ’tooned about free stuff for millionaires. Take professional sports:

    I’m still paying taxes for the Hoosier/RCA Dome, even though it was demolished 11 years ago. Mayor Bill Hudnut pushed it through the city-county council back in 1980, and used it (along with tax subsidies) to get Bob Irsay to move the Baltimore Colts here.

    Jimmie Irsay didn’t like sharing the stadium with the Indiana Pacers NBA team, so he got us to build Lucas Oil/Rape of The Taxpayer Stadium to the tune of a billion dollars. Irsay also gets a cut of the rental fees if anybody else uses the stadium.

    As the Hoosier/RCA dome went down, we (as in the taxpayers) built Bankers’ Life Fieldhouse for the Pacers, owned by the billionaire Simon Brothers.

    Since the City-County Council is no longer under corporatist control, It refused any money to build a new stadium for the professional soccer team Indy Eleven. So the multi-millionaire owner went to the supermajority Republican state legislature to get a tax-incentive financing bill through. (It’s still in committee, so I don’t know how it’ll fare.)

    But Varvie thinks that a decent education and decent healthcare for everyone is wrong.

    fusilier

    James 2:24

     •  Reply
  23. Ht rem small
    Push to talk  about 5 years ago

    Amazon had a profit of more than $11 billion and paid zero income tax. Plus they were given $100 million for a tax rate of -1%. The bottom 20% have an effective rate of 1.5%. So the poorest are funding corporate welfare.

     •  Reply
  24. Daffy duck
    walkingmancomics  about 5 years ago

    I think Varvel’s confused this with the GOP ‘plan’ of plutocratism.

     •  Reply
  25. Bbb
    NeoconMan  about 5 years ago

    Oh, c’mon, you guys; always calling for original work. This is only the 12,478th time that a conservative cartoonist has used the phrase “Free Stuff.” So it’s still pretty original.

     •  Reply
  26. Bill
    Mr. Blawt  about 5 years ago

    Better than the free stuff we are giving the rich out of the middle class!

     •  Reply
  27. Inbound to iraq  2
    Scoutmaster77  about 5 years ago

    It’s an old refrain exaggerated to the limit.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    randolini Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Socialism is for the rich corporations, they call it subsidizing. It’s like bribery is called lobbying. Socialism for the poor is evil.

     •  Reply
  29. Am  flag
    Geezer  about 5 years ago

    “A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.”

     •  Reply
  30. Poncho icon
    Jimathai Premium Member about 5 years ago

    This is all you got huh?

     •  Reply
  31. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103 r
    Kip W  about 5 years ago

    I’d rather see conservative cartoonists doing weak, derivative crap than anything hard-hitting and bitterly accurate about liberals, so I should probably “heart” this one.

     •  Reply
  32. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103 r
    Kip W  about 5 years ago

    Oh, and that’s a very nice rendering of the shiny tank.

     •  Reply
  33. Odin
    Holden Awn  about 5 years ago

    The bottom line is socialism is like a helicopter parent: providing security, protection, and succor while simultaneously, and perhaps inadvertently, stifling, smothering, and weakening.

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    6.6TA  about 5 years ago

    Mr. Varvel apparently misses the dead, burning rivers of recent times.

     •  Reply
  35. Linkingbookchannelwood
    toahero  about 5 years ago

    At the end of the day, the popularity of socialism is always inversely proportional to capitalism’s ability to provide for its people. If life was good for everyone, Bernie wouldn’t have such a strong following.

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    walfishj  about 5 years ago

    Gee, when a republican passes a tax cut for rich people, Varvel is mute. When republicans waste $65 B on a useless wall, Varvel is mute. When republicans steal money for emergencies, Varvel is mute. I think I prefer Varvel mute.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment