Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for September 19, 2016

  1. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 7 years ago

    Uh, isn’t that what Trump’s three blondes asked for first?

     •  Reply
  2. Figaro 1
    Wilde Bill  over 7 years ago

    A drink?

     •  Reply
  3. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 7 years ago

    Oh, and she wants to see your birth certificate, too… Fair’s fair!

     •  Reply
  4. Large tv test pattern  color
    Lyons Group, Inc.  over 7 years ago

    Talk about Wiley Bears, what about Wiley Women? (Except Danae, she’ll never be a Wiley Woman!)

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Hardthought  over 7 years ago

    I remain firm in my belief that this country will not elect a lying, corrupt, scamming, rape enabling woman like Spillary Clinton.

    Gary Johnson for president!

     •  Reply
  6. Avitar
    somebodyshort  over 7 years ago

    Gold digger. Avoid at all cost

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    DiminishedFirst  over 7 years ago

    The problem isn’t just that he said no. He made matters much worse by making up some BS about the IRS not allowing him to release them.

     •  Reply
  8. Sunset
    TheTrustedMechanic  over 7 years ago

    Neither are health records, but you guys have demanded Hillary’s.Neither are birth certificates, but you guys are still harping on Obama..Hypocrites the whole lot of you.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Hardthought  over 7 years ago

    Hey, @dogsniff Shouldn’t that be dogstank?

    Get out your own material and point out Benghazi to your candidate. While you’re at it, tell us how successful her foreign policy has been in Syria, Libya, Crimea and Iraq.

    I’ll wait.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Beleck3  over 7 years ago

    ah, the fight between Ms. Goldman Sachs and Frankenstein continues.

    they need to limit campaigns to 60 days, no more of this perpetual money seeking prostitution lasting from one election to the next.

     •  Reply
  11. Avatar 02 animated
    Michael Matchinsky  over 7 years ago

    No, but for someone who’s claiming his opponent isn’t “transparent.” For someone who’s being accused of fraud. For someone who’s being accused of working with enemies of the state. For someone who claims they give to charity but can provide no proof. For someone who claims they….. ad nauseum.

     •  Reply
  12. Penguin hero
    grainpaw  over 7 years ago

    Video of Trump in 2014 saying he would release his returns.http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/16/donald-trump-2014-taxes-comment-nr.cnn

    When he did release returns from the late 1970’s, he had paid $0. He has since denounced those who use loopholes to pay no tax.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-income-tax-returns-once-became-public-they-showed-he-didnt-pay-a-cent/2016/05/20/ffa2f63c-1b7c-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html

     •  Reply
  13. Pirate63
    Linguist  over 7 years ago

    They major reason Drumph won’t release his tax information is that there are too many forensic tax specialists out there who can read between the lines and publicly expose the the fraud that he’s perpetrating by bragging about his billionaire status when in fact his self-worth is a fraction of what he insinuates it is.Aside from being worthless ( pun intended ) I can’t wait until his hapless, hopeless followers realize the truth: THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES !!!

     •  Reply
  14. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 7 years ago

    She’s the high maintenance typeshe needs his money.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    fuzzbucket Premium Member over 7 years ago

    It is if you’re an attractive female putting yourself on the market for the highest bidder.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Jack64  over 7 years ago

    Translation i’m only interested if you have lots of money.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    slhbodkin  over 7 years ago

    is that miss digger. miss goldie digger?

     •  Reply
  18. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member over 7 years ago

    She went along with him until he asked her if a third party could join in….

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    dabugger  over 7 years ago

    Yes, a tax on all of you guys.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    korblimee  over 7 years ago

    http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/debate-rules-set-hillary-donors/Debates? What debates, all sound and fury signifing nothing. the winners have already been decided and we only have to pay for it, so cough up Peasants!!!

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    korblimee  over 7 years ago

    http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/debate-rules-set-hillary-donors/Debates? What debates, all sound and fury signifing nothing. the winners have already been decided and we only have to pay for it, so cough up Peasants!!!

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    korblimee  over 7 years ago

    http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/debate-rules-set-hillary-donors/Debates? What debates, all sound and fury signifing nothing. the winners have already been decided and we only have to pay for it, so cough up Peasants!!!

     •  Reply
  23. Kea
    KEA  over 7 years ago

    so are political parties

     •  Reply
  24. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  over 7 years ago

    The release of tax returns is an unwritten rule, it isn’t necessary..-It should be these days.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    rroush Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Surely there must be a hacker somewhere who could hack into the IRS and get Trump’s tax returns and publish them on Wikileaks.

     •  Reply
  26. Bob 01
    hg6it21  over 7 years ago

    Trump hasn’t released his Tax records even though he isn’t being audited or hasn’t proved that he is being audited. If he is being audited, what did he do that is illegal to cause a Tax Audit? Why doesn’t he release his Federal Tax returns for the 1990’s or the 2000’s? Why doesn’t her release his New York Tax Returns? WHAT IS HE HIDDING?

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    Thomas & Tifffany Connolly  over 7 years ago

    Just giver her a Harvey Wallbanger!

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 7 years ago

    Beleck3A Canadian once wrote, “If Britain can hold an election in four weeks, why do we take six?” So Canada reduced theirs to five. Three months is less than infinity, but it is still too long. One month with full disclosure of sources of contributions would accomplsh much more.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur