Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for April 09, 2018

Well, at least the white house is open.

Never to early to learn about NDA’s ,kiddies. You don’t know what you might hear or see in the halls.

Is a document legal if it’s signed in crayon?

NDAs also means that you can’t disclose the fact that there’s nothing worth disclosing.

And what will the children get if they sign them?

Just noticed all the cameras…….Good touch Mr. Miller….

as compared to the last admin when the guy wouldnt even let visitors in

Is that one of those agreements that Loretta Lynch signed when she met with Bubba on the tarmac?

Did they also have to imitate POTUS’s cabinet members and advisors at meetings and declare their undying admiration for him and what an honor it is to work for him?

Children are not citizens and should have no say in what the current government is doing to their future. They are “mushy headed” (Ted Nugent’s eloquent description) and are being duped by the liberal left. They should be mocked and bullied especially if they are too stupid to get into college.

Oh yes, and they will grow up very quickly and vote.

POTUS once opined that he would be dating some of the 10 year olds in a beauty contest, one day. They must have reminded him of IVANKA! What a good Christian!!

I wouldn’t sign the permission slip for my child to go to that now horrid place

45 makes everybody who deals with him sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement.

You’d think that would be a hell of a red flag, wouldn’t you?

Now children, you may have been told to be diligent in school so when you grow up to be POTUS. Let me update that good advice by adding “just not this one”.

According to my NDA I can’t make a comment. ;-)

Wow — all this in response to a rather weak joke. Must be the weather or something.

Are there still tours of the White House? I would think hyper-security would now preclude that. I took a WH tour in 1979; didn’t get to see much then.

" Yes. Johnny, you can use an alias on your NDA. The President’s lawyer does it all the time. "

@ Wiley Miller – Shameless, Unwarranted, Misrepresented and Disrespectful Depiction of Secret Service Agents’ Duties & Responsibilities as well as their “Goon-ish” XXL-Sized Appearance: all three dressed in Black & wearing dark glasses indoors . . . none of which has anything whatsoever to do with NDAs !!! . . . P.S. – re: the size of “nits” above – Yeah, I, also, caught the radio earpiece wire worn by the “Agent” seated behind the desk !!!

@ VARNES, et. al ~ F Y I: . . . USSS Agents are “A”-Political entities/beings; i.e. ~ Non-Political by Nature of the Beast !!!

I would really like to read the full content of one of the dotard’s NDA’s. It seems any attorney should be able to break a NDA, starting with the reason it was demanded in the first place.

Those Non Disclosure Agreements double as job applications – there are new openings every day and those children look better qualified than the people they’d be replacing!

“I hereby swear, to the best of my five-year old ability, that I will be at LEAST as childish as all the old people in the White House.”

Their tour was canceled because POTUS wants a different kind of playmate.

What happens in the White House, doesn’t stay in the White House.

I seriously doubt any of these kids are old enough to write in cursive.

Question is, does an NDA beat DNA?

So much for transparency. Though I’m sure the clown in the long red tie will assure his constituents that he is the most transparent President ever. Hugely transparent. Couldn’t be more transparent then him. What’s really disturbing is his rabid followers will believe him and insist everyone else is wrong.

LOL!

If I were working for this POTUS, I wouldn’t let an innocent child anywhere within visual distance of him.

Remember, it was a little child that first cried out: " The Emperor Has No Clothes ! "

Wiley kids are at least as cute as Wiley bears.

Would loved to have seen Danae at the back of the line…

Time to leave what has become a common comment from me here:

The important thing to remember about the Stormy Daniels suit is that it’s about a settlement agreement, not a non-disclosure agreement. The difference is that a non-disclosure agreement prevents Party A from saying false things that would be damaging to Party B. A settlement agreement prevents Party A from saying (or revealing) true things that would be damaging to Party B.

This education in law is brought to you by a listener of the @openargs podcast. Don’t take legal advice from a podcast.