Tom the Dancing Bug by Ruben Bolling for April 18, 2014

  1. 1939 11 adventure neff
    Donaldo Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Brilliant. I have the same thoughts every time I encounter this oddity in a movie. Just one more good reason to be a vegetarian.

     •  Reply
  2. Onion news1186.article
    Randy B Premium Member about 10 years ago

    No harm, except for death, which isn’t recorded.

     •  Reply
  3. Cheese man
    pumaman  about 10 years ago

    If any animals are harmed in the making of the movie, just eat it and it’s all good.

     •  Reply
  4. Warenbuffet
    poppops  about 10 years ago

    If God didn’t want us to eat animals, why did he make them taste so good.

     •  Reply
  5. Grey justice
    SKJAM! Premium Member about 10 years ago

    The movie thing is because the methods they used to film, say, horses falling down, didn’t instantly kill the animals, but made them suffer long painful deaths or permanent crippling.

     •  Reply
  6. Modx logo
    sottwell  about 10 years ago

    Movie horses were trained to fall down. They even used special soft materials in the saddles and stirrups – usually old tires – so the horses wouldn’t be hurt when they went down. If a horse is hurt at all, he won’t do it again. If you look carefully in the scenes where a horse falls, the ground is always clear and either soft earth, sand, or leaf-covered.

     •  Reply
  7. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  about 10 years ago

    ILM can install animatronics into a dead cow…

     •  Reply
  8. Nancy pie hole
    hablano  about 10 years ago

    Soylent Green: Try our new chicken flavor!

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    commie craft  about 10 years ago

    god bless america

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    brotherfelder  almost 10 years ago

    At the risk of sounding self righteous though, there IS a difference between killing animals to eat and survive, and killing them just for sport or entertainment.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Tom the Dancing Bug