Advertisement
Advertisement

Tom Toles for May 01, 2019

35 Comments

Hide All Comments
  1. Nct beach wiz
    DD Wiz Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Collusion, of course, is not a LEGAL term, which is why Robert Mueller explicitly addressed that word so commonly thrown around by a president who does not understand its lack of legal meaning, by saying he would not deal with such a NON-legal word.

    Mueller did identify 140 instances of collaborative, cooperative interaction between the Russians (who did commit the underlying crime of conspiracy to illegally influence a presidential election) and the Trump campaign. Addressing the legal term of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, Mueller determined that he could not prove that the collaborative interactions rose to the level of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, but that the question could not be pursued in any case because of a Nixon-era Dept. of “Justice” internal memo prohibiting indictment of a sitting president. Just a memo. No law. No statute. Nothing in the Constitution. Just a memo. Written during by the Nixon team.

    But Mueller DID identify those 140 interactions which, applying the popular meaning of the word COLLUSION (cooperation) do prove that Trump’s repeated denials of collusion are just more of his lies.

    Trump says “NO COLLUSION; NO OBSTRUCTION” but now we know there was clearly collusion and clear, specific instances of obstruction and criminal charges were not brought ONLY because of the Nixon-era prohibition against indicting a sitting president.

     •  Reply
  2. Picture
    EdMeiller Premium Member about 2 months ago

    So once again Donnie proves he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

     •  Reply
  3. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Just a straight up dictator.

     •  Reply
  4. Americanflag
    Masterskrain Premium Member about 2 months ago

    So, what will he do when the U.S. Marshals come knocking on the Oval Office Door with his Arrest Warrant for Contempt of Congress??

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    twclix Premium Member about 2 months ago

    On balance, I’ve come to think that we will all be best served to see tiny twisting in the wind for the next 18 months. Mueller’s report serves as a partial roadmap to well justified indictments on multiple charges of obstruction, but there are another dozen cases working there way through jhthe federal court system, and a number of state actions that are also ongoing, particularly in NY State where federal pardons are useless.

    Had Mueller sought an indictment, he would have become the central enemy of the regressives. Yes, with hearings and all, you could possibly rouse enough traitorous regressive Senators to vote for removal, but then you get Pence. If you remove tiny too soon, Pence has time to get elected in 2020. Amazingly, he could get sympathy votes.

    It’s far better to continue the process. Hold open hearings, let the criminality sink in and become the narrative. Drip, drip, drip, the potential for additional felony indictments will surface with the cases outside of the Russian treason. Money laundering. Frauds. Perjury. Obstruction. Plus who knows what else as the US Atorneys do their work. The regressives will slowly see the compounded impact of the multiple cases of criminal behavior.

    More importantly, the election will draw near, and tiny’s regressive, treasonous supporters will be whittled down over time. This way, you keep the boot of the law firmly on tiny’s neck. Just keep playing this out. The danger is that we slip into a nether region where tiny refuses to step down post election. But impeach him now, and he will become the victim.

     •  Reply
  6. Agent gates130516four
    Radish Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Dems need to begin to start arresting Trump admin minions who do not comply with subpoenas.

     •  Reply
  7. Picture 7 banjogordy crp 100
    Banjo Gordy Premium Member about 2 months ago

    I preferred the time in America when the President & the Village Idiot were two different people.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    DonnyTwoScoops  about 2 months ago

    The Trump team colluded (cooperated) with Russia when they took the Trump Tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary. Collusion has been evident for a couple of years no. Mueller found no “conspiracy” because apparently Don Jr. was too dumb to know cooperation with Russia was illegal.

     •  Reply
  9. Avv7uxthr0nws
    robnvon Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Favorite song of his teen years: “I’m Henry the Eighth I Am.”

     •  Reply
  10. Rwljlogo2
    The Wolf In Your Midst  about 2 months ago

    Trump does not believe himself to be above the law; he believes himself to be the law. He “won,” in his mind, so that justifies doing whatever he wants, including ignoring legal subpoenas just because the Democrats don’t “like” him.

     •  Reply
  11. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  about 2 months ago

    I’ve never agreed with the premise that the House impeaching Trump yet the Senate refusing to convict would necessarily backfire on the Democrats in 2020. Remember, Clinton’s alleged “crimes” were far less than Li’l Donnie’s, and Mueller’s reputation is far better than Starr’s (even before the Baylor football team “rape culture” debacle). If Flynn, Manafort, and far too many others are hauled in for PUBLIC hearings, day after day (nobody expects Trump to testify: he would lie repeatedly in the first couple of minutes—and then, he’d probably be warmed up!), the sheer mass of the corruption would likely keep Trump off the ticket. And it’s hard to think Pence could win an election by himself (or tie his shoes without his Mommy to help him)>

     •  Reply
  12. Ahl13 3x4
    Andylit Premium Member about 2 months ago

    No Tom, it is a buzzword that implies conspiracy. Of which none was found.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Tom Toles

Advertisement