Advertisement

John Deering for June 11, 2021

  1. Missing large
    Daeder  about 2 months ago

    You misspelled “Stinker”.

     •  Reply
  2. Download
    Walter Kocker Premium Member about 2 months ago

    “Look at me!”

    “Look at me!”

    “I’m important!”

    “Oh, why doesn’t anyone look at me?”

    (Hint: You’re a fraud and a self-important wanker).

     •  Reply
  3. Screenshot 20180802 120401 samsung internet
    Kurtass Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Why aren’t the democrats taking his leadership positions away. Republicans say the democrats are the kings of cancel culture. Republicans took Liz’s leadership away. I guess they are the kings of kancel kulture.

     •  Reply
  4. Quill pen
    Yontrop  about 2 months ago

    Maybe we should think. The man does have a problem. If he joins the centrist Democrats instead of looking like Republican light, the Republicans will call him a flaming liberal and he may loose his seat in the Senate to a real Republican and Mich will be Majority leader. It wouldn’t be so bad for him. He gets to be called “Senator” for life and I expect employment would not be a problem, but we wouldn’t like Mitch back in the “leader” roll would we.

     •  Reply
  5. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  about 2 months ago

    The majority of his states voters want him to vote yes for Voting Rights, so he really should do what his constituents want. If he doesn’t, they need to find another Republican to run against him in his next primary.

     •  Reply
  6. Wtp
    superposition  about 2 months ago

    Tell me again how binary partisan obstruction by politicians — whose only qualifications are age and citizenship — makes everything better than the will of the people would, for the US voters and their families.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    piobaire  about 2 months ago

    There is more to this than meets the eye. If Manchin is representing his constituents, then he should be voting for the ’For the People Act’ and for a big infrastructure bill. They want these things passed. If he is a leader, he should be coming up with much better reasons why he is against voting for bills his fellow Democrats have proposed.

    Something smells about this.

    It may involve money. It may involve hoping for pork for his state. It may involve pressure from Oligarchs. It may be a self-centered desire to be important. It’s probably a combination of things.

    There is more to this than meets the eye.

     •  Reply
  8. 7a3d35b05103496eecec311170ba260d
    Pickled Pete  about 2 months ago
    Just call him ‘Waffling Joe’.
     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Steverino Premium Member about 2 months ago

    He’s a DINO.

     •  Reply
  10. Warning
    MontanaBill Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Dangerous to have principles in the Democratic Party.

     •  Reply
  11. Photo
    FrankErnesto  about 2 months ago

    He is looking at his next election. He knows where his money comes from, it isn’t small donations either.

     •  Reply
  12. Screenshot 2020 12 31 at 9.22.22 am
    codak  about 2 months ago

    the filibuster, in this malformed senate anyway, can be legitimate when the minority of senators represent the majority of the nation. . .this should be a compromise filibuster he proposes

     •  Reply
  13. Acellist
    acellist Premium Member about 2 months ago

    No one should give an “h” !

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    rlaker22j  about 2 months ago

    that’s what he’s waiting for his chance to join the Qs

     •  Reply
  15. Confused1
    Flatlander, purveyor of fine covfefe  about 2 months ago

    Check today’s Last Kiss

    https://www.gocomics.com/lastkiss/2021/06/11

     •  Reply
  16. Picture4
    @Rad-ish  Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Manchin’s reversal on 79% WV approved For the People Act follows corporate donations

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., suggested that Manchin’s opposition to the proposal and filibuster reform may really be about measures in the bill aimed at cracking down on lobbyists and dark money.

    “This is probably just as much a part of Joe Manchin’s calculus than anything else,” she told MSNBC on Tuesday. “You look at the Koch brothers and you look at organizations like the Heritage Foundation and conservative lobby groups that are doing a victory lap … over the fact that Manchin refuses to change on the filibuster. And I think that these two things are very closely intertwined.”

    “When it comes to this ‘bipartisan’ argument, I gotta tell you, I don’t buy it,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “Joe Manchin has voted for bills that have not been bipartisan before. Look at the American Rescue Plan. So this is not just about bipartisanship.”

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/6/10/2034698/-Manchin-s-reversal-on-79-WV-approved-For-the-People-Act-follows-corporate-donations?utm_campaign=trending

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    amethyst52 Premium Member about 2 months ago

    The filibuster doesn’t have to be completely removed. Just change it back to a senator having to defend his/her position on the floor for hours or days. ted crud would love to read Green Eggs and Ham to us again.

     •  Reply
  18. Smokey
    Zuhlamon Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Duh?

     •  Reply
  19. Avt freyjaw tiki48
    FreyjaRN Premium Member about 2 months ago

    He looks constipated.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    Bendarling1  about 2 months ago

    Perhaps “the thoughtless” would be more appropriate if you care about the majority of US inhabitants.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From John Deering

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement