Two Party Opera by Brian Carroll for October 26, 2020

  1. Missing large
    dotbup  over 3 years ago

    Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett spent much of her hearing refusing to answer any difficult question with any specificity, even when her past writings and speeches spoke loud and clear. The kinds of things we heard from her: “If I give off-the-cuff answers, then I would basically be a legal pundit. […] I don’t think we want judges to be legal pundits. I think we want judges to approach cases thoughtfully with an open mind”; and, "If I express a view on a precedent one way or another […] it signals to litigants that I may tilt one way or another on a pending case.”

    As Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal said, she’s “so far perfected the art of non-answers.” This rampant, blank-slate dis-ingenuousness from Barrett proved to be as irritating throughout the day as Brett Kavanaugh’s fake outrage and crocodile tears in his hearing, and just as unbelievable. When she held up a blank notepad, she wasn’t demonstrating what Sen. John Cornyn, who asked her about it, was saying she was. He called it “impressive” that she was there without notes. What it was was insulting. She came to that hearing prepared to do nothing but obfuscate and refuse to answer questions, without even bothering to prepare because she knows the fix is in and Republicans are going to jam her onto the bench no matter what. Her blank sheet of paper was the perfect, albeit unwitting, metaphor for this entire sham of a process.

     •  Reply
  2. Img 0536
    akachman Premium Member over 3 years ago

    A dark, sad day in America (what’s left of it).

     •  Reply
  3. Pat new 150
    Patjade  over 3 years ago

    Just wait until the new Senate comes in and invalidates her appointment since it violated procedure in getting out of committee (no quorum).

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    PraiseofFolly  over 3 years ago

    I wonder if Barrett ever stops to lament that she has become a pawn in the struggle between political ideaologies? I wonder what the other Justices think of all this? Are they so far above in the legal stratosphere that it doesn’t concern them? Barrett’s connection with late Justice Scalia distresses me. Now there’s a man who seemed to arrogantly relish his “Olympian” status, judging from his various public interviews.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Znox11  over 3 years ago

    C’mon guys, give it a break. We could be watching history in action here. The last vote by the GOP before it disappears forever thanks to Donald J. Trump.

     •  Reply
  6. Dr coathanger abortions 150
    Teto85 Premium Member over 3 years ago

    What’s next after Griswold V Connecticut? Brown V Board of Education? Thank dog we emigrated to a civilized country.

     •  Reply
  7. Desron14
    Masterskrain Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Welcome back to the 1800s, America.

     •  Reply
  8. Wtp
    superposition  over 3 years ago

    Tell me again how our 2 opposing parties, mutually exclusive, “winning is more important than governing”, electorate-ignoring, self-serving, political system makes our country stronger, wiser, healthier, happier, and more secure than multiparty democracies.

     •  Reply
  9. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 3 years ago

    Ruth opened opportunities for women, Amy will close them down.

     •  Reply
  10. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Payback will be a b*tch.

     •  Reply
  11. Video snapshot
    Baslim the Beggar Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Another great cartoon, Brian. Well stated — and I love the sequence of Kavanaugh getting drunk

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    casonia2  over 3 years ago

    Exactly, Brian!

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    face.less_b  over 3 years ago

    RGB, it’s a little late for that gurrrrl.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    face.less_b  over 3 years ago

    At this point those on the left can only pray for the health of Justices Thomas and Alito

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    face.less_b  over 3 years ago

    The Justices have drivers, correct? Then no hope for a drink driving incident.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    jaypem  over 3 years ago

    Doggone it! You mean that we will have a justice who won’t be an activist? Someone who isn’t a populist? What a “radical” idea!

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    kentmarx36  over 3 years ago

    Unfortunately, this sounds all too true of the handmaiden’s approach to women’s rights. racism, and the rule of law. Welcome BACK TO THE FUTURE of the 4th American Reich. When did a large part of this country lose its ability to think or show empathy for their fellow citizens?

     •  Reply
  18. Durak ukraine
    Durak Premium Member over 3 years ago

    They are going to swear her in tonight. Aggregious abuse of power. Just because you CAN do a thing does not mean that you SHOULD do a thing.

     •  Reply
  19. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 3 years ago

    I hope the American people vote out every Republican as payback.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Two Party Opera