Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett spent much of her hearing refusing to answer any difficult question with any specificity, even when her past writings and speeches spoke loud and clear. The kinds of things we heard from her: “If I give off-the-cuff answers, then I would basically be a legal pundit. […] I don’t think we want judges to be legal pundits. I think we want judges to approach cases thoughtfully with an open mind”; and, "If I express a view on a precedent one way or another […] it signals to litigants that I may tilt one way or another on a pending case.”
As Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal said, she’s “so far perfected the art of non-answers.” This rampant, blank-slate dis-ingenuousness from Barrett proved to be as irritating throughout the day as Brett Kavanaugh’s fake outrage and crocodile tears in his hearing, and just as unbelievable. When she held up a blank notepad, she wasn’t demonstrating what Sen. John Cornyn, who asked her about it, was saying she was. He called it “impressive” that she was there without notes. What it was was insulting. She came to that hearing prepared to do nothing but obfuscate and refuse to answer questions, without even bothering to prepare because she knows the fix is in and Republicans are going to jam her onto the bench no matter what. Her blank sheet of paper was the perfect, albeit unwitting, metaphor for this entire sham of a process.
I wonder if Barrett ever stops to lament that she has become a pawn in the struggle between political ideaologies? I wonder what the other Justices think of all this? Are they so far above in the legal stratosphere that it doesn’t concern them? Barrett’s connection with late Justice Scalia distresses me. Now there’s a man who seemed to arrogantly relish his “Olympian” status, judging from his various public interviews.
C’mon guys, give it a break. We could be watching history in action here. The last vote by the GOP before it disappears forever thanks to Donald J. Trump.
Tell me again how our 2 opposing parties, mutually exclusive, “winning is more important than governing”, electorate-ignoring, self-serving, political system makes our country stronger, wiser, healthier, happier, and more secure than multiparty democracies.
Unfortunately, this sounds all too true of the handmaiden’s approach to women’s rights. racism, and the rule of law. Welcome BACK TO THE FUTURE of the 4th American Reich. When did a large part of this country lose its ability to think or show empathy for their fellow citizens?
dotbup over 3 years ago
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett spent much of her hearing refusing to answer any difficult question with any specificity, even when her past writings and speeches spoke loud and clear. The kinds of things we heard from her: “If I give off-the-cuff answers, then I would basically be a legal pundit. […] I don’t think we want judges to be legal pundits. I think we want judges to approach cases thoughtfully with an open mind”; and, "If I express a view on a precedent one way or another […] it signals to litigants that I may tilt one way or another on a pending case.”
As Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal said, she’s “so far perfected the art of non-answers.” This rampant, blank-slate dis-ingenuousness from Barrett proved to be as irritating throughout the day as Brett Kavanaugh’s fake outrage and crocodile tears in his hearing, and just as unbelievable. When she held up a blank notepad, she wasn’t demonstrating what Sen. John Cornyn, who asked her about it, was saying she was. He called it “impressive” that she was there without notes. What it was was insulting. She came to that hearing prepared to do nothing but obfuscate and refuse to answer questions, without even bothering to prepare because she knows the fix is in and Republicans are going to jam her onto the bench no matter what. Her blank sheet of paper was the perfect, albeit unwitting, metaphor for this entire sham of a process.
akachman Premium Member over 3 years ago
A dark, sad day in America (what’s left of it).
Patjade over 3 years ago
Just wait until the new Senate comes in and invalidates her appointment since it violated procedure in getting out of committee (no quorum).
PraiseofFolly over 3 years ago
I wonder if Barrett ever stops to lament that she has become a pawn in the struggle between political ideaologies? I wonder what the other Justices think of all this? Are they so far above in the legal stratosphere that it doesn’t concern them? Barrett’s connection with late Justice Scalia distresses me. Now there’s a man who seemed to arrogantly relish his “Olympian” status, judging from his various public interviews.
Znox11 over 3 years ago
C’mon guys, give it a break. We could be watching history in action here. The last vote by the GOP before it disappears forever thanks to Donald J. Trump.
Teto85 Premium Member over 3 years ago
What’s next after Griswold V Connecticut? Brown V Board of Education? Thank dog we emigrated to a civilized country.
Masterskrain Premium Member over 3 years ago
Welcome back to the 1800s, America.
superposition over 3 years ago
Tell me again how our 2 opposing parties, mutually exclusive, “winning is more important than governing”, electorate-ignoring, self-serving, political system makes our country stronger, wiser, healthier, happier, and more secure than multiparty democracies.
Radish the wordsmith over 3 years ago
Ruth opened opportunities for women, Amy will close them down.
mourdac Premium Member over 3 years ago
Payback will be a b*tch.
Baslim the Beggar Premium Member over 3 years ago
Another great cartoon, Brian. Well stated — and I love the sequence of Kavanaugh getting drunk
casonia2 over 3 years ago
Exactly, Brian!
face.less_b over 3 years ago
RGB, it’s a little late for that gurrrrl.
face.less_b over 3 years ago
At this point those on the left can only pray for the health of Justices Thomas and Alito
face.less_b over 3 years ago
The Justices have drivers, correct? Then no hope for a drink driving incident.
jaypem over 3 years ago
Doggone it! You mean that we will have a justice who won’t be an activist? Someone who isn’t a populist? What a “radical” idea!
kentmarx36 over 3 years ago
Unfortunately, this sounds all too true of the handmaiden’s approach to women’s rights. racism, and the rule of law. Welcome BACK TO THE FUTURE of the 4th American Reich. When did a large part of this country lose its ability to think or show empathy for their fellow citizens?
Durak Premium Member over 3 years ago
They are going to swear her in tonight. Aggregious abuse of power. Just because you CAN do a thing does not mean that you SHOULD do a thing.
Radish the wordsmith over 3 years ago
I hope the American people vote out every Republican as payback.