Michael Ramirez for June 10, 2020

Waah. Go pound sand and cry to Sean Hannity, Ramirez.

Oh God, it’s sooo touching when Trump Disciples criticize lack of integrity.

.

“Just grab ‘em by the p-word. When you’re a star, you can get away with anything.”

“And Mexico will pay for it!”

“MAGA loves the blacks.”

“Anyone who wants a test can get a test.”

“I don’t take responsibility for ANY of it!”

“Old crazy Presidents never die, they just fade away” – Trump’s parting speech

Amazing how some of the commenters don’t know the difference between political speech and supposedly nonpolitical, objective, factual, disinterested (NOT uninterested) reporting. Well, they can’t be blamed: the reporters on the NYT et al. don’t know it either.

…issues an apology. You’ll have to explain that phrase to the ‘president’.

Gee, coming from a GOP troll with NO integrity, supporting a party with even less integrity, and having no intention of ever having integrity, that is pretty gritty.

Some, evidently this cartoonist included, only like newspapers an outlets who constantly praise Trump, no matter how wrong he is.

Trump and his enabelers are deliberately stoking anger to run a law and order campaign. He loves the protests

Ramirez if you actually believed in integrity, most, if not all, of your cartoons would be blank.

mr ramirez knows all about intolerance…

Would you want the Times to publish an op ed by David Duke? Trump and his buddies are neo-fascist gangsters, and the news media should say so. That would be objective reporting. For too long they have been afraid to tell the truth about Trump.

I’m Michael Ramirez and I hate America.

The vicious Cotton editorial should never have been published, the editor was fired.

Careful, Mr. Ramirez… some may say that you faded to pure white long ago…

Compared to Ramirez, it is still on top. They actually published that terrible opinion, why would you be upset?

What’s this all about? Their coverage of Whitewatergate is so yesterday.

Whew! I thought the NY Times apologized to the loathsome sycophant Tom Cotton. Thanks for making me look it up Ramirez. The NYT apologized for running Cotton’s Trump-happy opinion piece regarding the need to use military to quell riots. The world makes sense again. And I can go back to knowing that only one Cotton is worthy of my attention – Harp player extraordinaire James.

Then there’s “Fifty Shades of Invisible: A Study of the Integrity of Mike Ramirez”

Wow, coming from someone who uses free speech as a cudgel such as Michael Ramirez, this is rich.

Bonespurs’ is just written in invisible ink, right?

It’s clear that 90% of these people posting don’t even know the backstory. This comic has nothing to do with Trump. The NYT’s “allowed” a letter to the editor from a sitting U.S. Senator (Cotton) who advocated for something liberals didn’t approve of. All hell broke loose, editors resigned, others had their positions changed, all because liberals can’t handle an opposing viewpoint!!!

NYT lost all objectivity years ago, and with the Trump election they lost their collective minds!

From the paper that printed and Op-Ed from Vladimer Putin!