Jack Ohman for January 21, 2020

Thousands of lies since assuming office. Why would we believe anything he says? Except, probably, for liking hamberders.

Certainly, NO ONE wants to hear Parnas testify, since Trump doesn’t know him, and neither does Rudy.

Wonder if Rudy will cash in his insurance policy.

.

#TraitorTrump

Just Parnas for the course.

That best brain can’t seem to remember anyone once they’re indicted.

Old rhyme:

As I was walking up the stair,

I met a man who wasn’t there.

He wasn’t there again today.

I wish, I wish he’d go away!

America’s little Russian, by way of Brooklyn leprechaun. He’s seen all and most gleeful to bring down Trump and the GOP. Just when you think America is doomed a New Yorker by way of the Ukraine comes to the rescue. Only in America can such a tangled web come untied by such as he.

Deny deny deny, lie lie, lie, deceive, deceive, deceive,….the GOP Creed…..LOWlifes of America United!

But, OF COURSE, all those pictures and videos and hand autographed cards and everything else are ALL “Fake news”, made up by the “Dying New York Times”, and the “Lying media”!

Yeah, THAT’S the ticket!!

It seems that Trump has never met anyone!!!

As ALWAYS, when the orange buffoon is confronted by truth…he lies!

Lev is so much easier to find than Waldo. You look for a Trump ally and there he is.

The family mobster.

sniff!sniff!

Lev Parnas has announced that, every time #45 refuses to admit he knows him, he will release additional photos of the two of them together!

https://www.businessinsider.com/lev-parnas-trump-claims-threatens-photos-receipts-2020-1

But Li’l Donnie, channeling Carl Sagan, will say “I have my picture taken with billions and billions of people! Can’t remember all the damn things!”

In other shocking news, Li’l Donnie never ONCE heard of either Vlad Putin or Helsinki……..

Lev Parnas =Trump’s stained blue dress.

You can’t trust that Lev Parnas guy…look who he hangs out with.

sarcasm

Have you seen Dershowitz’s book on why Trump should not be impeached? He actually says that Trump could allow Putin to grab away Alaska due to it formerly belonging to Russia and that offense would not be impeachable.

He also ignores that Article II, section 4 of the Constitution, after naming specific reasons for impeachment then gives flexibility by mentioning “other high crimes and misdemeanors”. In fact, without those words Clinton woould not have been able to be impeached (though the limits of the legal definition of sex caused him to be found innocent). The reason Dershowitz wants to ignore those words is to disarm the obstruction charge, of course, given that the entire nation witnessed many incidences of obstruction by Trump.

Oh, and he further wrote that tyrannical actions are not cause for impeachment.

See: (https://books.google.com/books?id=afaBDwAAQBAJ&q=alaska#v=snippet&q=alaska&f=false )

Of course, the Government Accountability Office DID say that Trump committed a specific crime.