Mike Luckovich for September 19, 2019

  1. Ddwiz avatar
    DD Wiz Premium Member over 4 years ago

    Once again, Luckovich nails it!

    FOLLOW THE MONEY. There are no millionaire climate scientists. No billionaire climate scientists.

    ALL the money comes from Big Oil spending bazillions on poopaganda so they can keep selling a product that KILLS PEOPLE, exactly like Big Tobacco (and supported by many of the same apologists).

    THERE IS NO MONEY IN “BIG SCIENCE.”

    I can show you the corporate executive billionaires at ExxonMobil, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron. Anyone who wants to claim there is some kind of fraud or hoax needs to SHOW ME THE BILLIONAIRE climate scientists, professors, field researchers, etc. who are supposedly profiteering from this fraud.

    And there is NO INCENTIVE to fabricate climate change. Scientists conduct research, and a scientist does not make more or less depending on the outcome. The ONLY INCENTIVE is with Big Oil because they are making BILLIONS off a product that, like Big Tobacco before them, KILLS PEOPLE and they don’t want the BLOOD MONEY to stop.

    Whatever research dollars are spent on climate science all goes to EXPENSES. It costs money to travel to Antarctica and all over the world and to run labs and buy equipment.

    Sure, PhD scientists go to school for a lot of years, more years than those Big Oil executives and investors, and in return they make a decent MIDDLE CLASS income, but no one gets rich off of climate science (except the ones who sell out to Big Oil).

     •  Reply
  2. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  over 4 years ago

    Not very long from now, there’s going to be a choice of having already done something  or suffering serious, deadly, consequences.  Folks who are actively obstructing the “doing” aren’t just exercising their rights, they are actively obstructing  the survival of many of us. Say it again:

    “Those people are _actively obstructing the survival of many of us!”_

    When folks get in the way of the police or fire crew, they are moved, by force if necessary. This is bigger than a fire or a burglary. Why aren’t they being forcibly removed?

     •  Reply
  3. Get smart shoe phone
    gopher gofer  over 4 years ago

    it’s “doo doo doo doo”…

     •  Reply
  4. Coexist
    Bookworm  over 4 years ago

    When we can no longer see the sun, will it still be there? Or will there be anyone left to see it, if it is?

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    jborg Premium Member over 4 years ago

    Ice core samples covering 800,000 years show that greenhouse gases have never been anywhere near current levels, but began this meteoric rise in the 1800s with the industrial revolution. The second graph in this report is an excellent short cut:

    Changes since the Industrial Revolution – American Chemical Societyhttps://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/greenhousegases/industrialrevolution.html

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Monchoxyz  over 4 years ago

    When Trump heard the the world will end in ice he said not in my watch.

     •  Reply
  7. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 4 years ago

    Stop the socialist government subsides to fossil fuel companies.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    jvscanlan Premium Member over 4 years ago

    He who dies with the most wins

     •  Reply
  9. I yam who i yam
    Kind&Kinder  over 4 years ago

    The truly sad thing is that, when the air gets too toxic to breathe, we can’t open a window. And that’s true for everyone — bar none.

     •  Reply
  10. Toughcat
    bakana  over 4 years ago

    And 99% of the Climate Denial was paid for by the Koch Brothers.

    One of whom is now Dead.

     •  Reply
  11. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member over 4 years ago

    This week’s special double issue of Time is entirely devoted to climate change. It began with the publisher’s introduction to the issue, which prompted me to send this letter to the mag under the heading “NOT SKEPTICS!”:

    Edward Felsenthal leads off Time’s special issue on climate change with an unfortunate phrase: “climate-change skeptics”. This does a disservice to true skeptics, who have the healthy mental attitude of being all about the evidence. You claim to have met space aliens? You’re telepathic? You’re the reincarnation of Cleopatra? You have a “miracle” cancer cure? Show me the evidence!

    But when that evidence is not only forthcoming but available in massive quantities — as with evolution, the Holocaust, the Moon landing, and climate change — actual legitimate skeptics accept and embrace it. Those who don’t are more properly called refusers, deniers, or conspiracy theorists, and I strongly recommend that you henceforth adopt that more accurate terminology.

     •  Reply
  12. Mooseguy
    moosemin  over 4 years ago

    Enjoy YOUR wealth TODAY! Don’t worry about what your own children will face tomorrow: That’s THEIR problem! (And just hope St Peter takes bribes, when your turn comes!)

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Mike Luckovich