Matt Bors for March 26, 2019

  1. 2b21f09a 63d7 4ad1 83a6 fdf4d8b30651
    Zev   about 5 years ago

    The GOP and POTUS had a bit of a scare there, but now it’s back to (corrupt) business, I guess.

     •  Reply
  2. Kca mind the snp
    Ryan Plut  about 5 years ago

    Don Jr and Eric as Beavis and Butthead. Love it!

     •  Reply
  3. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 5 years ago

    I fear for the USA.

     •  Reply
  4. Other7 brush
    Meh~tdology, fka Pepelaputr   about 5 years ago

    With Bill Barr’s fake Mueller report, the GOP is pulling out the playbook of lies it used to sell us on invading Iraq

    https://www.alternet.org/2019/03/with-bill-barrs-fake-mueller-report-the-gop-is-pulling-out-the-playbook-of-lies-it-used-to-sell-us-on-invading-iraq/

     •  Reply
  5. Toughcat
    bakana  about 5 years ago

    All of Mueller’s witnesses are much more afraid of Vlad than they are of a Federal Supermax.

     •  Reply
  6. John wick
    Redd Panda  about 5 years ago

    trump says Mueller has zonerated him, totally. What goes on between two adults, behind closed doors, is nobodies business, but theirs. Why does trump feel the need to bring his perversion out into public view? He never fails to creep me out.

     •  Reply
  7. Anarcho syndicalismvnnb   copy
    gigagrouch  about 5 years ago

    Where did @guyjen2004 & @Maverick go?

     •  Reply
  8. Image
    SukieCrandall Premium Member about 5 years ago

    We have only Barr’s edited summary. Okay, speaking as an INDEPENDENT:

    Given the bases of several convictions and confessions there were attempts at collusion (which is itself a crime) by multiple members of the campaign, and at least one (Manafort) was in a situation in which his laundered money and tax scam could be held over him by the Russians and Russian allies who helped him do it (which is why the trial about his finances was held first).

    Now some might say that despite multiple attempts at collusion that the campaign would not have done it if the opportunity arose. To that my response is “Huh? Then why so many people spending time trying?”.

    The current interesting questions are these:

    Is an employer responsible for the actions of his employees that were taken for his campaign, business, mob, drug cartel, whichever-type-of-entity when they were employees with whom he met?

    If an employer (or mob boss if someone then uses it as a precedent) is not responsible for the actions of those he employs then is it collusion if he attempts to obstruct them talking about their own crimes, or is it obstruction only if he himself is charged with the crimes that were related to the obstruction attempts no matter how public those attempts were?

    We might soon get courts creating some strange precedents which might be expanded in defenses by drug lords, CEOs of companies which endanger employees or pollute badly, and heads of mobs.

     •  Reply
  9. The eye of god
    Woodstock Generation Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Did Trump actually read a report? Or did he just dictate what his subordinate AG should say? Just asking?

     •  Reply
  10. Picture
    RobvEccles  about 5 years ago

    Ignorance is a good link to Matt Bors

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Bors