Bob Gorrell for July 10, 2018

Just thinking out loud here, but shouldn’t we want extreme vetting for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court?

Two when it should have been three? Yeah, shows how the ’Cons “play fair”.

@COMI, And since when was anybody (you) appointed to decide just how many judges any sitting President is granted to select and get approved ? Please enlighten me! . . . And by the way you just wrote “Courtesy” You sure we are talking about the same guy here ? ‘Cause you guy I’m sure will never understand the meaning of courtesy

Nice of Gorrell to conflate how U.S. now treats immigrants with how McConnell stonewalled Garland’s nomination!

Yes, Gorrell; we need extreme vetting for a position on the SCOTUS. We can’t afford conservatives to do to the SCOTUS what they have done to the Presidency.

How can it be stolen? The Senate applied the Schumer Rule.

C’mon folks, “extreme” vetting is exactly what Trump is doing.

His “vetting” is intended to guarantee the most extreme candidate he can find.

It should be done with a Celebrity Death Match.

The extreme vetting has already been accomplished by the Federalist Society.

The search was four times as wide as the one conducted by Dick Cheney for Bush’s VP.