Chip Bok for November 06, 2016

  1. Wrong
    BaltoBill  over 7 years ago

    Citizens United was a Supreme Court case. How does it “Make a Movie”?

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    davidthoms1  over 7 years ago

    Chip is profoundly ignorant and easily fooled.

     •  Reply
  3. Crow
    Happy Two Shoes  over 7 years ago

    Was this the lying movie paid for by Trump?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    DrDon1  over 7 years ago

    More delusional “thinking” from Bok?

     •  Reply
  5. Icon face rock
    ForALaugh Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Get real Chip. You really need to stay away from Fox. You know that nearly everything that they say is a lie or at least a misdirection don’t you?

     •  Reply
  6. Crow
    Happy Two Shoes  over 7 years ago

    The case before the Supreme Court revolved around Citizens United wanting to its documentary, “Hillary: The Movie,” which was highly critical of the Democratic candidate. Under the McCain-Feingold law, corporations and unions are barred from paying for political ads made independently of candidate campaigns. A federal court had barred the organization from advertising its film, and appeals sent the case to the Supreme Court, where the government argued it had the power under the Constitution to prohibit the publication of books and movies if they were made or sold by corporations.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Pogostiks Premium Member over 7 years ago

    More attempted snow jobs by the Right and subversion of the truth via the media? Chip Bok… we’re on to you. Enough, already;not everyone has the IQ of a ten year old or a Republican…

     •  Reply
  8. Ys
    HabaneroBuck  over 7 years ago

    This is what George Will and many others warned about with “campaign finance reform.” It is, quite demonstrably, a full-frontal assault on the first amendment, and it doesn’t matter if your motives for such a bill are as pure as snowfall in northern Canada.

     •  Reply
  9. L
    ahab  over 7 years ago

    Mindless Fox News viewer make for better endless comedy.

     •  Reply
  10. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  over 7 years ago

    No one is in jail for making a movie about Muhammed. Either Bok is amazingly ignorant or he’s deliberately misrepresenting the truth. Which is it, I wonder?

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 7 years ago

    The NPP

    If imaginary “third guy” is still a minor, the university is legally in loco parentis. Not much of a threat, considering they never get punished for parental neglect when some drunk frat boy or athlete rapes someone – other than forcing a notorious ex-“special prosecutor” to resign from a Southern Baptist school.

     •  Reply
  12. 200
    Michael Peterson Premium Member over 7 years ago

    So it’s come down to simply telling lies because you have nothing honest to add to the debate. Nakoula was jailed for bank fraud and intent to run a meth lab, you lying piece of ****.

     •  Reply
  13. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103 r
    Kip W  over 7 years ago

    Nice to see Trump taking the high road in the final days, campaigning with that clean-mouthed Ted Nugent, who, in 1978, became legal guardian of a 17-year-old he was having sex with. Ted would have happily fought in Vietnam, only he deliberately crapped his pants before showing up at the draft board, and regrettably had to forego the pleasure of taking part in one of the wars he loves so much.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    markjoseph125  over 7 years ago

    The guy on the right would not be in jail; he’d be dead (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_van_Gogh_%28film_director%29).

    .

    Just another free service offered to you by the Abrahamic religions!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Chip Bok