JumpStart by Robb Armstrong for October 30, 2016

  1. 0438aab5 b754 4b25 b41d bb310caeac1d
    GirlGeek Premium Member over 7 years ago

    He didn’t bring the babies in the house first?

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Dr.DocSmith  over 7 years ago

    Did he not sell the books for $2,000? Why not, if it took 18 years to buy them, they are too old to even care about…..

     •  Reply
  3. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  over 7 years ago

    don’t want ’em

    can’t bring yourself to sell ’em

    and your smart phone provides better, more current information quicker

    such is life

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    944tim  over 7 years ago

    four foot of bookshelf filler.

     •  Reply
  5. Olive oyl phooey
    Sir Ruddy Blighter  over 7 years ago

    Sorry, I don’t get this. Why is he upset if he didn’t sell the books? Can someone explain, please?

     •  Reply
  6. Watermelon avv
    car2ner  over 7 years ago

    I was such a nerd as a child. I used to sit and read the encyclopedia. We still have a set. They are nearly pristine. More decorative than useful now.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    kade82  over 7 years ago

    A good encyclopaedia is still a good place to jump start research into a subject, regardless of its age.

     •  Reply
  8. Menew
    Thomas Scott Roberts creator over 7 years ago

    For how many years did Joe’s parents shelve those books with the spines facing inward? How did they know which volume was which?

     •  Reply
  9. Little b
    Dani Rice  over 7 years ago

    The Internet or a CD may be handy, but you want something glued down or held up, you can’t beat a set of encyclopedia.

     •  Reply
  10. Smiley tongue
    Smiley Rmom  over 7 years ago

    I’ve been culling out my bookshelves for years. Still holding onto a few that we just can’t part with, but got rid of the encyclopedias many years ago. The hardest part is figuring out where to donate old textbooks. If someone had offered me $2000, I’d have taken it in a heartbeat!

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    sueb1863  over 7 years ago

    I would have taken the $2000, bought a new encyclopedia set on the internet, and saved the rest of the money in the kids’ college fund.

    The kids will never touch these, they can find everything they need on the internet and the information won’t be at least twenty years old, maybe older.

     •  Reply
  12. 06 us2c ue24
    Sailor46 USN 65-95  over 7 years ago

    A full set of the Encyclopedia Britannica (32 Book Set) (Hardcover) is about 500 bucks on a popular retail site. Joe, you should’ve taken the 2000 and bought a set from said site. Do the math!

     •  Reply
  13. Dr coathanger abortions 150
    Teto85 Premium Member over 7 years ago

    I encountered a situation like that. I waited for the gift givers to pass on and then went to eBay.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    quanyindove  over 7 years ago

    @car2ner…. I guess my friend nds and I were “nerds” too. I remember reading the ones in my basement for hours. In the early 80’s, they were from the 70’s. We found them very cool.

     •  Reply
  15. Me on trikke 2007    05
    pam Miner  over 7 years ago

    I hadn’t thought of those in Years!What year would they be from?1950? 1960? newer?There may be collectable, to some people who have big houses, If the grid goes down or something takes out the internet, there may be valuable info in them.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 7 years ago

    Three-quarters century of National Geographics (plus index) work as well and on the balance, more accurate than the Internet.

     •  Reply
  17. Profilepic
    nefa  over 7 years ago

    I believe it’s “Britannica”, not “Brittanica”

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From JumpStart