Donald Trump’s plan for a wall is pure nonsense. A much better idea would be yes, tighten border security. []But we should also…[]1. Impose much more strict penalties than we have now for employers who hire undocumented workers.[]2. Make any immigrant who entered the country before 2012 eligible for amnesty. ( But only be granted it under strict rules of acceptance. )
So Trump says that Clinton’s judgment can’t be trusted because she voted for the War in Iraq. Then he chooses a VP candidate who voted for the War in Iraq. When this is pointed out to him, he says he doesn’t care, and that it was okay for Pence but not okay for Clinton. How can any thinking person support someone who operates this way? Is this really what you want? Really?
My reason is BENGHAZI!translation: My gut says to ignore all the evidence, because the first thing anybody said to me about it was that she was guilty of things!
Well, my G/F and I seem to be in Friendly territory … sort of.We don’t like anybody; all we see are a lot of hands and feet Shoveling-the-You-Know-What.As for “The Don-Ald’s” supporters, … (Shrug!)
“That’s what I hear. . .what everybody says. . .I hear it everywhere. . .I don’t know Reagan’s dad, but your hearin’ it. . .it’s everywhere. . .very sad. . .
NeedaChuckle Premium Member almost 8 years ago
And his followers would believe that.
Kip W almost 8 years ago
He’ll say anything. They’ll believe anything. A match made in some place starting with an H.
cubfan1937 almost 8 years ago
Monty Python’s flying candidate. THE MINISTRY OF SILLY HAIR.
Simon_Jester almost 8 years ago
Donald Trump’s plan for a wall is pure nonsense. A much better idea would be yes, tighten border security. []But we should also…[]1. Impose much more strict penalties than we have now for employers who hire undocumented workers.[]2. Make any immigrant who entered the country before 2012 eligible for amnesty. ( But only be granted it under strict rules of acceptance. )
californicated1 almost 8 years ago
If anybody is spinning in their grave over this, it’s probably P.T. Barnum.
lonecat almost 8 years ago
So Trump says that Clinton’s judgment can’t be trusted because she voted for the War in Iraq. Then he chooses a VP candidate who voted for the War in Iraq. When this is pointed out to him, he says he doesn’t care, and that it was okay for Pence but not okay for Clinton. How can any thinking person support someone who operates this way? Is this really what you want? Really?
Happy Two Shoes almost 8 years ago
Trump is trying to kill reality and his low information followers are sucking up the lies.
Dtroutma almost 8 years ago
Californicated: Barnum is blowing the top off his casket with laughter, crying tears and saying “told you so!”
route66paul almost 8 years ago
While I can’t stand that man, the woman running against him is worse. Since I live in a state that will go for HC, I will vote 3rd party.
Kip W almost 8 years ago
My reason is BENGHAZI!translation: My gut says to ignore all the evidence, because the first thing anybody said to me about it was that she was guilty of things!
jbk864 almost 8 years ago
Well, my G/F and I seem to be in Friendly territory … sort of.We don’t like anybody; all we see are a lot of hands and feet Shoveling-the-You-Know-What.As for “The Don-Ald’s” supporters, … (Shrug!)
charliekane almost 8 years ago
“That’s what I hear. . .what everybody says. . .I hear it everywhere. . .I don’t know Reagan’s dad, but your hearin’ it. . .it’s everywhere. . .very sad. . .
Dtroutma almost 8 years ago
The “literary” Trump; “all for one, and that is ME!” Not hardly a musketeer, not even a qualified Mousekateer.