And as with the endless GOP Scandal investigations – Much ado about nothing. Half of the “News” reported today cites leaks or confidential sources, because anywhere from 3 hours to 50 years after publication it’s gets a security label put on the information in it!
It is most definitely NOT “much ado about nothing”!-A rebuttal to Hillary’s “defenders” who do not speak truth to power…..www.townhall.com has a 2/6/16 article by Guy Benson, “FBI, Intelligence Sources: Hillary’s Debate Answer on Email Scandal Was Nonsense”….-Hil used the usual misleading assertions….at the 2/6 Dem Debate…an Ex-FBI for 28 years….Steve Pomerantz said“They (FBI) do not do ‘security reviews’…what they are doing in (Hillary’s case) is a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.”-A source told Fox News recently that senior agents In counterintelligence are working this case and “the FBI is extremely serious and the A-team is handling.”-Evidence is showing that Hillary didn’t choose a private server for “convenience”…improper, insecure, and did official business on it….1,600 classified emails including some at the highest level of secrecy. Hil’s excuse ‘they weren’t marked at the time’ is irrelevant according to the binding nondisclosure agreement she signed in 2009."-“In Hillary Clinton’s case, if the private server was compromised by a third party, the extet of the damage may be unknowable.”-And it is highly unlikely, IMO, that the FBI notifies the primary suspect (even an official, high level) of the “Status of the Investigation.”!!-IMO Hillary Clinton is campaigning for top office in the USA as an “as yet, unindicted conspirator!” And her trouble today is 100% caused by one person=HRC!
@disgustedamericanThere may be something to it. The problem is it’s so hard to tell. There have been so many false alarms over the years. The “murder” of Foster, the Whitewater controversy. And this sort of smear seems to be be such a fundamental part of the Republican game plan. Obama is a Moslem, secretly a Kenyan, etc. etc. etc.
Personally, I don’t like the Clintons. I think they are sleazy, dishonest and card carrying members of the one percent. But, when I read another story of them doing this or that, my eyes start to close and my mind to wander. Those who wish them ill have cried wolf too many times for me to really want to pay attention.
Sorry, folks: You can’t just throw people in jail because you disagree with them. Even in America. Most of the time. Unless they can afford lawyers like OJ had.
Grayhair, The Pirate Formerly Known as Tom Powell Premium Member about 8 years ago
Too funny!
1941gko about 8 years ago
And as with the endless GOP Scandal investigations – Much ado about nothing. Half of the “News” reported today cites leaks or confidential sources, because anywhere from 3 hours to 50 years after publication it’s gets a security label put on the information in it!
kline0800 about 8 years ago
It is most definitely NOT “much ado about nothing”!-A rebuttal to Hillary’s “defenders” who do not speak truth to power…..www.townhall.com has a 2/6/16 article by Guy Benson, “FBI, Intelligence Sources: Hillary’s Debate Answer on Email Scandal Was Nonsense”….-Hil used the usual misleading assertions….at the 2/6 Dem Debate…an Ex-FBI for 28 years….Steve Pomerantz said“They (FBI) do not do ‘security reviews’…what they are doing in (Hillary’s case) is a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.”-A source told Fox News recently that senior agents In counterintelligence are working this case and “the FBI is extremely serious and the A-team is handling.”-Evidence is showing that Hillary didn’t choose a private server for “convenience”…improper, insecure, and did official business on it….1,600 classified emails including some at the highest level of secrecy. Hil’s excuse ‘they weren’t marked at the time’ is irrelevant according to the binding nondisclosure agreement she signed in 2009."-“In Hillary Clinton’s case, if the private server was compromised by a third party, the extet of the damage may be unknowable.”-And it is highly unlikely, IMO, that the FBI notifies the primary suspect (even an official, high level) of the “Status of the Investigation.”!!-IMO Hillary Clinton is campaigning for top office in the USA as an “as yet, unindicted conspirator!” And her trouble today is 100% caused by one person=HRC!
DrDon1 about 8 years ago
If C. Powell did it … No problem!If C. Rice did it … No problem!If H. Clinton did it … Problem!
oneoldhat about 8 years ago
drdonotknow powell received // rice received // hilliary sent // there is a difference
WGW101 about 8 years ago
@disgustedamericanThere may be something to it. The problem is it’s so hard to tell. There have been so many false alarms over the years. The “murder” of Foster, the Whitewater controversy. And this sort of smear seems to be be such a fundamental part of the Republican game plan. Obama is a Moslem, secretly a Kenyan, etc. etc. etc.
Personally, I don’t like the Clintons. I think they are sleazy, dishonest and card carrying members of the one percent. But, when I read another story of them doing this or that, my eyes start to close and my mind to wander. Those who wish them ill have cried wolf too many times for me to really want to pay attention.
Michael Peterson Premium Member about 8 years ago
Sorry, folks: You can’t just throw people in jail because you disagree with them. Even in America. Most of the time. Unless they can afford lawyers like OJ had.
The Moderate about 8 years ago
the Fox News “source” was the former deputy director of the FBI