Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for February 20, 2015

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 9 years ago

    That sure isn’t sexist.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    phylum  about 9 years ago

    I don’t know how calvin can understand the word cromosomally and not advantaged

     •  Reply
  3. Bighorn sheep mary rogers
    bluram  about 9 years ago

    Why should Calvin even care as long as he’s called on time for supper?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    nikolatasche  about 9 years ago

    Nice

     •  Reply
  5. Lamb2
    WCLamb  about 9 years ago

    “As to being “politically correct” that is a misuse of that term. Totally has nothing to do with politics.”—George Orwell had it right. It’s called doublespeak. And we didn’t learn the lesson when we could see what was coming, because of it.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    GrimmaTheNome  about 9 years ago

    Whether ‘politically’ correct or not, Calvin seems to be a bit scientifically incorrect, with his stunted little Y chromosome and only one full-sized X ;-) .

    At least he’s only likely to be called a ‘boy’ till he’s about 20.

     •  Reply
  7. Pteranodon2
    Pteranodon  about 9 years ago

    Folks, and I mean each of us, please keep the tone civil. Mr. Watterson frequently includes social commentary in his humor, and if we ignore the “humor” part, we are missing the main point — spreading laughter and smiles.

     •  Reply
  8. 0701160940
    Aaron Saltzer  about 9 years ago

    How about “Conceded Brat”? Lol

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    stamps  about 9 years ago

    Actually, the Y chromosome is but a shadow of the X, so it is more correct to say that males are chromosomally challenged.

     •  Reply
  10. Barbaraprz
    BarBaraPrz  about 9 years ago

    I say chromosomally DAMAGED… one of his Xs broke a leg…

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    hamon  about 9 years ago

    Sadly this is no longer a joke in some circles. Aren’t there 14 different “genders” now?

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    thoallan  about 9 years ago

    It’s really quite shocking to me that there are commenters on here that don’t seem to see the humor of this strip. Why would they be drawn to C&H, I wonder, if this type of humor grated on them?

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    dflak  about 9 years ago

    Dear Sir and/or madam as the case may be,

     •  Reply
  14. Susie2
    Susie Derkins :D  about 9 years ago

    Good thing you won’t be thinking about transgendering.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    nikolatasche  about 9 years ago

    Cool Comic

     •  Reply
  16. Spurgeon2
    jim_pem  about 9 years ago

    These days it seems that whatever you choose to say to strangers to be respectful you are likely to offend someone. Why even bother? If people are too thin-skinned to recognized that you are trying to be respectful and they angrily turn and nit-pick your choice of how to express your attempts, you might as well not even bother trying to be respectful. Why not be guilty of what you are going to be accused of anyway? Political correctness, it seems, yields a society where no one can be truly successful at being respectful.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    yangeldf  about 9 years ago

    the word “advantaged” might be a trigger word for feminists too

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    yangeldf  about 9 years ago

    the word “advantaged” might be a trigger word for feminists too

     •  Reply
  19. Airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  about 9 years ago

    When I was 19, I thought about referring to myself as a ‘woman’ instead of a ‘girl’ as soon as I turned 20.Now I’m 20, I still don’t feel right being referred to as a woman. Guess I’ll grow up when I’m ready!xxx

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    nikolatasche  about 9 years ago

    I like this one

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    nikolatasche  about 9 years ago

    another good one :)

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Calvin and Hobbes