Comments (36) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Nos Nevets said, 3 months ago

   no bias here. Just the facts,
2. 

   Jon Ormsbee said, 3 months ago

   I suspect the legislation will get a burst of laughter in the end, or just a three round burst.
3. 

   edinbaltimore said, 3 months ago

   Uncle Sam should have the target on his back. The rest of us sure do.
4. 

   mdavis4183 said, 3 months ago

   Why the hatred for the NRA? We have ove 20,000 “gun legislations” on the books. Biden says the government doesn’t have the time to enforce them.
5. 

   Larry said, 3 months ago

   Careful, the starting gun (blanks) will draw armed response.
6. 

   michael ricigliano said, 3 months ago

   Right on Target (as always)
7. 

   jack75287 said, 3 months ago

   @HOWGOZIT

   Tell me about it what are you going to do after your second shot.
8. 

   Omnius said, 3 months ago

   So pitiful how the cowardly rightwing gun nuts whine about needing to own too many guns. More guns has always led to more gun deaths. A well regulated militia is what our National Guard is, the racist rightwing neo-nazi gun nut groups are nothing but terrorists bent on fomenting armed revolution against our legal government.
9. 

   hippogriff said, 3 months ago

   Let’s go back to “original intent” – flintlocks! One shot, a puff of smoke to show shooter location, and a half minute to reload.
   .
   Omnius: We haven’t had a “well regulated militia” for 150 years. It was abandoned for conscription during the Civil
   war. The real purpose of the second amendment was to “ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense” without recourse to the European evils of a large standing army, mercenaries, or conscription (what we have now). Although the draft is not currently enforced, it is still on the books – high unemployment-forced “volunteering” has replaced it since it mainly targets the poor – as assignments did when it was in force (see W).
10. 

    Mark said, 3 months ago

    @mdavis4183

    Probably because, in spite of that, the NRA claims that even one will lead to the confiscation of guns.
11. 

    ansonia said, 3 months ago

    @Mark

    Your comment is confusing. Are you saying that the NRA has said that if one law is enforced, it means guns will be confiscated?
    .
12. 

    ansonia said, 3 months ago

    @Omnius

    You can have any opinion you want; however, the Supreme Court has ruled you are wrong.
    .
    And what makes you so sure our government is all that “legal” ? Do you know everything obama is doing? Are you sure? Always remember that the msm voted for him.
    .
    BTW, using all those inflammatory terms does not make your argument stronger. Or truer.
13. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 3 months ago

    @mdavis4183

    Why do you call it “hatred?” Why do you have trouble with citizens, including many NRA members, want sensible controls that the present NRA stopped supporting?
14. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 3 months ago

    @jack75287

    Some shotguns can hold up to 12 shells.
15. 

    Ionizer said, 3 months ago

    @Omnius

    “More guns has always led to more gun deaths.”
    
    Wrong again. The places that have the harshest anti-gun laws are way more dangerous than those that don’t.
16. Load the rest of the comments (21).