Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for October 18, 2010

  1. 14
    Redhead55  over 13 years ago

    Oh geesh. There goes the operation from the git-go.

     •  Reply
  2. Pict0001
    MiepR  over 13 years ago

    I guess this is the costume he’s been using for the Facebook photos. Sensible to bring it along…you never know.

     •  Reply
  3. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member over 13 years ago

    Jeff thinks the costume is a serious outfit.

     •  Reply
  4. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  over 13 years ago

    This doesn’t look good for Jeff.

     •  Reply
  5. Photo  1
    thirdguy  over 13 years ago

    The kid just might have the cojones to pull this off!

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    mckelja  over 13 years ago

    Nice banana.

     •  Reply
  7. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  over 13 years ago

    It’s not a costume, it’s a uniform! Did he buy it from our neighborhood spammer?

     •  Reply
  8. Blender
    heeyuk  over 13 years ago

    Is that banana loaded?

     •  Reply
  9. 20141103 115559
    Potrzebie  over 13 years ago

    I hope to see the red rascal in a mandress!

     •  Reply
  10. O p veteranpatch small
    randgrithr  over 13 years ago

    Watch out for those grapefruits too.

     •  Reply
  11. Lady dragoncat
    Dragoncat  over 13 years ago

    So much for “serious outfit”…

    Oh, well… If he’s going to have his million-dollar head chopped off, he might as well be in character.

     •  Reply
  12. Cicada avatar
    Dirty Dragon  over 13 years ago

    It’s so much easier to appear sincere if you have a total lack of self-awareness. (You betcha.)

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    rotts  over 13 years ago

    OMG! Funftuppelspammerflaggen!

     •  Reply
  14. Photo  1
    thirdguy  over 13 years ago

    Is there a spam convention going on? I didn’t get the memo.

     •  Reply
  15. V  9
    freeholder1  over 13 years ago

    Capitalism in a free society. What a wonderful thing. Glad there are no government restrictions on those guys selling stuff. We sure don’t ever need that kind of evil interference with our lives. (Irony 101. Please reference “Roxanne”.)

     •  Reply
  16. V  9
    freeholder1  over 13 years ago

    RR seems to have to have lost his head and forgotten that he’s a legend in their minds and legends don’t often seem so big in real life. They even lose their heads in certain societies.

     •  Reply
  17. Jackcropped
    Nemesys  over 13 years ago

    If there were government restrictions on these guys selling stuff, there could just as easily be government restrictions on our comments about these guys selling stuff.

    The Constitution can be annoying sometimes, but hey, it’s the only one we got. GoComics, on the other hand, can put any restrictions they like upon who gets to post here.

    I’ve been waiting for Garry to do a Palin-a-Thon just before the elections, but maybe he’s finally realized that ragging on the right simply annoys the Independents and backfires. The Red Rascal theme is a “present” vote, which is probably a good idea right now.

     •  Reply
  18. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 13 years ago

    I confess to feeling about Jeff the way some feel about the pelican in “Daddy’s Home.” And by “some” I mean those who want him somewhere else.

     •  Reply
  19. Me 3 23 2020
    ChukLitl Premium Member over 13 years ago

    In societies where human sacrifice is popular, the victims are generally volunteers to be elelvated to godhood. They’re getting shortchanged with just 72 virgins.

     •  Reply
  20. Img 0004
    dfowensby  over 13 years ago

    eeew. eternity with a buncha virgins??? (oh yeah: those guys better hope theyre not male virgins. heh) give me a couple dozen nymphos for my godhead. er, hood.

     •  Reply
  21. June 27th 2009   wwcd
    BrianCrook  over 13 years ago

    Interesting argument, Nemesys. if you equate commerce with speech, then I trust that you would approve the legalizing of all currently illegal drugs.

     •  Reply
  22. Turkey2
    MisngNOLA  over 13 years ago

    Mr Crook, I for one do advocate such. The “war on drugs” is just a tired rehashing of the failed policy of Prohibition. It’s created the same issues (more violence though) and hasn’t done a thing to stop personal use of most of the drugs covered by the controlled substances list. The list also continues to grow longer as each time a substance, naturally produced or otherwise is found which gives the user a measure of what he/she wants, the Federal government moves to ban it by adding it to the list. I would take bets at high odds that more people have been killed in the war on drugs than have died due to illicit drug use. But of course we know that the war on drugs is big business for police departments, prison systems and the like as much of the operating budgets for many of these institutions depend heavily on money raised by the Constitutionally shaky seizure of property in drug busts.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury