Tom the Dancing Bug by Ruben Bolling for July 21, 2016

  1. 220px charles bowles aka black bart
    Steve Bartholomew  almost 8 years ago

    Yeah, I’m glad that couldn’t ever happen.

     •  Reply
  2. Onion news1186.article
    Randy B Premium Member almost 8 years ago

    An extra wrinkle in the real world is that corporations can pay (“lobby”, “contribute”) to have the laws bent in their favor.They think it’s their fiduciary duty, apparently.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    gammaguy  almost 8 years ago

    And yet it’s not their fiduciary duty to pay dividends to the stockholders instead of massive “compensation” to the CEO?

     •  Reply
  4. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member almost 8 years ago

    Well, that sums it up in a most horrifying manner.

     •  Reply
  5. Pirate63
    Linguist  almost 8 years ago

    " Corporations are people, too ! "

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    markjoseph125  almost 8 years ago

    Although not the main thrust of the cartoon, it is nevertheless useful to point out that the top right panel very concisely demolishes the canard that “religion is necessary for morality,” an argument that has been known to be specious at least since Plato’s Euthyphro, but which fundamentally dishonest religious people continue to parrot.Furthermore, when some religious person states “If I didn’t believe in god, I’d just do whatever I wanted to,” he tells us more about himself than about the supposed necessity of religion for morality. Wasn’t it the well-known atheist Penn Jillette who said that he kills and rapes as many people as he wants to, namely, zero?

     •  Reply
  7. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 8 years ago

    It would be immoral for the utility company NOT to dump coal ash into the drinking water.

    Not to worry, though. The federal government will soon be run just like a business.

     •  Reply
  8. Dancing
    davids.comments  almost 8 years ago

    Very similar to the sovereign citizen movement argument about the person vs. their sovereign corporate entity.

     •  Reply
  9. Dk black red yellow
    Kreature  almost 8 years ago

    Bolling’s premise is flawed but using “inexplicably” gets him off the hook apparently.

     •  Reply
  10. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103 r
    Kip W  almost 8 years ago

    Break it off a piece of that Kit Kat bar!

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    jondelfin Premium Member almost 8 years ago

    I have more trouble with “belive.” 20 years later, and the typo lives? Sigh.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Tom the Dancing Bug