Wizard of Id by Parker and Hart for March 03, 2014

  1. Img 6884
    Rod Gonzalez  about 10 years ago

    Yeah.

    It says: “The candidates are FINKS!”

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    watmiwori  about 10 years ago

    She’s got THAT right!

     •  Reply
  3. 20230415 170925
    Chithing Premium Member about 10 years ago

    I’d probably vote for the fink. At least he’s honest about his personality.

     •  Reply
  4. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 10 years ago

    She has it wrong. If you don’t like the candidates, then you should get off you posterior and actively support someone you do like. Do some research. Look for someone who understands the issues. Or by God run for office yourself, unless you think the very act of running for office corrupts you. Of course, there’s the money issue, which is what trips up most well-meaning candidates. But that’s not so much the individual candidates as the system under which they labor. So, yeah, it says more about the people than the candidates.

     •  Reply
  5. Wls 1
    Aaberon  about 10 years ago

    (chuckling!!)

     •  Reply
  6. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  about 10 years ago

    If all candidates were goodLittle reason to voteEither one wouldBe able to run the boat

     •  Reply
  7. Screenshot 163
    Cminuscomics&stories Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Let’s all vote against our own self interest. Oh, wait… How can we tell…?

     •  Reply
  8. Knighboy
    RickMK  about 10 years ago

    It’s going to be a long time before a candidate other than a Republican or Democrat wins, and until then it doesn’t make any difference who you vote for or who wins, since there’s no practical difference at all between Republicans and Democrats.

    On the other hand, you can make a difference in local elections. In my home town, people were so disgusted with the horrible things the local governments was doing to our home town, the incumbent mayor was voted out and 3 write-in candidates for Borough Council beat the current council members being voted on. Local elections matter. But national? I vote for a candidate I like and then don’t even bother watching the news to see who’s winning because it doesn’t make any difference whether the Republicans or Democrats win.

     •  Reply
  9. Picture 001
    rshive  about 10 years ago

    58% is a bit high, isn’t it?

     •  Reply
  10. Dale s photo
    Tuner38  about 10 years ago

    If all candidates are badlittle reason to voteWhoever gets in office will get the voter’s goat.

     •  Reply
  11. Inbox 4660
    goweeder  about 10 years ago

    “I vote but it doesn’t seem to matter lately, I didn’t vote for obama, twice. And I feel sorry for the people that did, they have got to be suffering from severe voter’s remorse.”~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Yeah — In his first term, he was so much worse than Bush that we decided to vote for him again.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    watmiwori  about 10 years ago

    Been saying this for years! For decades there has been no ‘lesser’ evil to choose. All “choices” onoffer are as bad as the others. What is needed is thepossibility of a negative vote. You vote FOR a goodcandidate [if you can find one], or AGAINST the one you think is the worst, but not both. Whoeverhas the most net positive votes or the fewest netnegative votes “wins”.

     •  Reply
  13. Downloadfile
    Guilty Bystander  about 10 years ago

    I’ve decided to vote AGAINST all incumbents this fall regardless of party affiliation (as if one major party is really an improvement over the other). Voting FOR people hasn’t done a thing.

     •  Reply
  14. Robin hood 16297
    RobinHood2013  about 10 years ago

    If only we could employ the Monty Brewster approach and vote for “None of the Above”!

     •  Reply
  15. Sg county zoo 077
    loner34  about 10 years ago

    AND he warned them (open mic.) I will have more flexibility after the election.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    tuslog64  about 10 years ago

    The problem is that all candidates are VIEWED as crooks?Why?Because each party spends millions digging up dirt on the opponents instead of what their candidte will do.That’s why it looks like the choice of the lesser evil.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    ambassadorstt  about 10 years ago

    A resounding….. AMEN!

     •  Reply
  18. Logo
    Chris Sherlock  about 10 years ago

    Totally agree with you!

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    gaslightguy  about 10 years ago

    If they had a box on the ballot marked “None of the above”. I bet participation would skyrocket.

     •  Reply
  20. Old joe
    ratlum  about 10 years ago

    Vote for your favourite lobbyist ?

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    Burnout70s  about 10 years ago

    Yes. He has not done enough because he gives in to much.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Doublejake Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Not even a tiny bit. I shudder when I think of Sarah Palin in the VP’s office. Romney would have been a smaller disaster, but if you think Boehner has a hard time riding herd on the Tea Party, imagine what it would be like with a vaporous personality like Romney in the Oval Office. Nope, our remorse STILL comes from having just a few instances of voter fraud in Florida in 2000 resulting in the Supreme Court appointing the worst. president. ever. Not an iota of a shred of a scintilla of doubt in my mind that the country would be far, far, far better off had Bush/Cheney never gone to Washington.

     •  Reply
  23. Gramma
    Kim0158 Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Republic. . . . If it were a democracy, there’d be no leaders. . . .

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    Doublejake Premium Member about 10 years ago

    I won’t disagree with your assessment about either — but the country was still better off after both Nixon and Carter than it was after Baby Bush and his Puppeteer….

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Wizard of Id