Robert Ariail for May 22, 2019


Hide All Comments
  1. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Don’t worry. The field will be winnowed down soon.

     •  Reply
  2. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Don’t open that if you don’t want an educated and healthy population!

     •  Reply
  3. Rick o shay
    wiatr Premium Member about 1 year ago

    I could not recite the names of all of these candidates if I ever had to. It has gotten beyond silly. Let’s hope some of these people start dropping away soon. No, I don’t have any in mind, partly because of the conditions I stated in my first sentence.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    DaBoogadie Premium Member about 1 year ago

    It’s good to have choices. Limiting the number of those choices…bad, very bad.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    guyjen2004  about 1 year ago

    The problem with this many candidates is the lengths many of them will have to go to to get noticed. There’s only so much funding to go around and it’s starting to line up behind the more viable candidates. Hopefully the field will be down to a reasonable number soon. Otherwise some of these nitwits will be promising us a million bucks each and the ability to fly like Superman.

     •  Reply
  6. Vote
    mourdac Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Do not, under any circumstances, open the ’Con alternative without a hazmat suit.

     •  Reply
  7. 1471171 10151698535381044 1778044294 n edited 3
    Stephen Runnels Premium Member about 1 year ago

    The sad part is that Ariail most likely believes the nonsense he gets from Limbaugh and foxnews personalities.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    wirepunchr  about 1 year ago

    It looks like the can got relabeled from 2016. Hopefully the results will be different.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    OldCoal  about 1 year ago

    Several are obviously doing Senate runs early, getting the name out in Red states while nobody else is speaking. Others are just getting the name out for publicity or for polling tests. Name has to be known before a serious run at the POTUS spot.

    Much of this is a game. There are actually about five candidates.

     •  Reply
  10. Lifi
    rossevrymn  about 1 year ago

    Short on material, are we?

     •  Reply
  11. 7a3d35b05103496eecec311170ba260d
    Pickled Pete  about 1 year ago

    Don’t you guys support ANY progressive ideas…Republican starts with the same letter as regressive….long live the R…!

     •  Reply
  12. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member about 1 year ago

    The length some will go to.. for a brief moment in front of a camera…

     •  Reply
  13. Img 0668b
    Coopersdad  about 1 year ago

    Any Democrat is better than the turd in the White House!!!

     •  Reply
  14. Picture4
    #Rad-ish  Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Only socialist tax cuts for billionaires are allowed under republican rule.

     •  Reply
  15. Photo
    VadimUzdensky1  about 1 year ago

    Free Stuff. I have a problem with the word ´stuff´. Education, Transportation, and Healthcare are human rights, not stuff.

     •  Reply
  16. John adams1
    Motivemagus  about 1 year ago

    @OldCoal and @martens, I agree. This is about positioning the party as much as it is people running themselves up the flagpole, so to speak.

    We’re already seeing some polarization taking place, I think:

    1. The “leftists” – the people I think of as actual liberals, and none of them are “socialists” offering “free stuff” — that’s just ignorant on Ariail’s part: Warren, Harris, Sanders. Pretty much all in the FDR/New Deal tradition, with incremental progressive movement. A subsection of them are pushing hard on voters’ rights

    2. The “young white guy” – Beto, Mayor Pete, and their ilk: socially liberal, but very (too) willing to compromise — I suspect this is old politics in a new package for the most part, and they’d be willing to go along with the powers that be or cave to the GOP hard-liners. (Mayor Pete reminds me of a gay Romney, if you look at his history.) As white guys, they’re “safer” candidates, but have a veneer of progressivism. “Hey, I know he bulldozed people’s homes who got screwed over by mortgage companies, but look, he’s gay!”

    3. The old Democrats: Joe “I’m the adult in the race” Biden. Entitled old-party hacks, centrist Republicans in Democratic clothing (remembering that Obama’s positions weren’t far from George H. W. Bush). Relative to current positioning, Joe is precisely where Jeb Bush was at this time in 2015, and I wouldn’t weep to see him get hammered in Iowa and New Hampshire, but he probably won’t.

     •  Reply
  17. 89738c00 a0c6 4a06 95bb 3f32e1b6d158
    quixotic1  about 1 year ago

    …any one of which would be infinitely better than the dotard.

     •  Reply
  18. Zombie keith
    streetbeater  about 1 year ago

    Ariail is supposed to be a centrist. I guess he decided to show his true colors.

    I suppose the Republicans crowd in ’12 was better, Bob. After all, look at what floated to the top.

     •  Reply
  19. Bill
    Mr. Blawt  about 1 year ago

    Socialism = benefits for the middle class

    green new deal = lowering pollution to help our environment

    higher taxes = for billionaires who pay little or nothing

    open borders = no more killing children in cages

    medicare for all = healthcare as a right

    free stuff = a society that respects more than CEOs and Corporations getting free stuff

    Identity politics = equality

    Sounds good to me, just don’t let the whiny conservative write your label for you.

     •  Reply
  20. Daffy duck
    walkingmancomics  about 1 year ago

    “Socialism”— like the government paying farmers who can’t sell their produce because of tariffs imposed by the government?

     •  Reply
  21. Screenshot 20180802 120401 samsung internet
    Kurtass  about 1 year ago

    Robert, I would like you to post a link to one Democratic candidate that has said they want open borders. This challenge also goes out to all the trump supporters. I will be waiting.

     •  Reply
  22. My personal icon
    cocavan11  about 1 year ago

    “Simplism” to such an extent as to bring about distortion, misunderstanding, and error is Ariail’s sole forte. His sole goal is to feed the fire, not contain it, much less extinguish it. That’s not objective journalism; that’s provocative disinformation intended to obscure the truth. Shame on him.

     •  Reply
  23. Rwljlogo2
    The Wolf In Your Midst  about 1 year ago

    At least none of them is running under the slogan of “and we’ll make Mexico pay for it!”.

     •  Reply
  24. Large bryanfarht
    Bryan Farht  about 1 year ago

    It’s just the FREEDOM of choice. Is that no longer allowed?

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    tompet46  about 1 year ago

    As the toddler in chief throws a temper tantrum today saying there will be no infrastructure improvements until ALL investigations are stopped. I’ll take anyone in your can of sardines Mr. Ariail over this idiot.

     •  Reply
  26. Photo
    AndrewSihler  about 1 year ago

    “Platitudes”??!! From where I sit, Publican rhetoric consists of nothing but platitudes. Well, also straw men.

     •  Reply
  27. Inbound to iraq  2
    Scoutmaster77  about 1 year ago

    False labeling…

     •  Reply
  28. 20841741 470526546644028 5711918097007563718 n
    Nantucket Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Ariail should be willing to give up his “free stuff” – don’t drive on public roads, don’t call the police or fire department, pay for your own water outside of municipal sources, don’t accept any public education, don’t go to the library, etc.

    Education, healthcare, food, housing need to be supported. Amazing that the alleged “family values” “Christians” care more for the rich than the poor, the opposite of what Jesus would do.

     •  Reply
  29. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  about 1 year ago

    The ingredients list would never pass the FDA test, even as it’s now being run. Not one Democrat (nor Bernie) advocates “open borders”. And of course, “Socialism” is an entirely different beast from “Communism” on one side and “Democratic Socialism” on the other. I agree that the rest of it’s fairly on point:

    Green New Deal: Yup. We want to have a discussion about how to cope with the current state of denial about climate change. It’s not a policy, it’s a talking point.

    Higher taxes: Yup: On the excessively rich. And on corporations that currently pay little or no tax… or even get credits against taxes that exceed the amount they might have paid.

    Medicare for All: Only a GOPist can imagine that not providing health care for citizens is a good thing. We’re the last of the “advanced” nations to adopt such an idea and our health outcomes show that contrary to what the GOP (and health corporations) trumpet, we are not doing it right!

    Free Stuff: Well, no. But stuff we want from the taxes we pay as opposed to stuff that just makes the excessively rich even more excessive. Things like the insane (literally) amount of military spending. How about, instead, we see to it that no US citizen graduates from college with more debt than 1/4 the full price of a house in the community where they went to school. And make the interest be no more than the annual amount of inflation.

    Identity politics: Yup. Politics based on the people who actually live here. I fail to see how this is in any way a bad thing. Seriously. Are you a white, male, assterisk? Vote for GOPist candidate. Are you hispanic? Vote for someone who speaks your language. Totally OK.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    edward thomas Premium Member about 1 year ago

    The Republicans have been playing the “white, male (only, not women) identity” card for years. It’s time we REALLY called them on it, our politicians talking around it.

     •  Reply
  31. Durak
    Durak Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Wow, an awful lot of work for a rock stupid message.

     •  Reply
  32. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma Premium Member about 1 year ago

    The real scare, and danger, is that Republicans started with 16 jerks, and we ended up with the worst of ‘em. Of course, Dems still have to reach a lot deeper in the barrel to find anything as slimy and corrupt as Bonespurs.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Robert Ariail