Tom Toles for October 07, 2009

  1. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 14 years ago

    To think that our actions have no consequences is ridiculous. And even deniers who claim it’s all natural ought to ponder how they want humanity to survive in that new world. But if there is even a small positive change we can make – even if reducing, reusing, recycling only helps a little, we have a moral obligation to do so.

     •  Reply
  2. Keithmoon
    Wildcard24365  over 14 years ago

    Well, it’s simple! Once the full effects of climate change kick in, and the economy of the U.S. is in ruins from all the passive-aggression on the part of the corporations and their co-dependents running it, life in the U.S. will look just like a Mad Max movie, the ultimate Neo-Con fantasy: -no central government -no mamsy-pamsy artists criticizing our way of life -no lawyers making ridiculous rules protecting minorities -most of all, NO GUN CONTROL just one big character-building environment where people prove their worth every day, the Ayn Rand way!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    hastynote Premium Member over 14 years ago

    AH! Ayn Rand!!!

    Great FICTION!!!

     •  Reply
  4. Kiss
    eft  over 14 years ago

    Why is there so much push back on the global warming problem? It’s not just the greedy rich not caring if the poor live in waste. Truly understanding the issue, one realizes that the foundation of American economic theory does not work in a closed system. This foundation is Growth. From all sides, the benchmarks used to measure economic health is constant growth. Who will explain the wheat and chessboard problem to the American people?

     •  Reply
  5. Kiss
    eft  over 14 years ago

    Again harleyspin -

    You call us chicken littles - then your counter-argument is “tax us to death.” Do you know the history of tax rates in this country?

     •  Reply
  6. Avatar2
    PoppaBob Premium Member over 14 years ago

    HQ - dihydrogen monoxide? Let’s see, that’s - WATER! And it is a “greenhouse gas” (but not, apparently, classified as such by the US Supreme Court) and it is in much higher concentrations than CO2. So how much tax money are we going to spend to prevent water evaporation around the planet and, therefore, prevent global warming?

    My question is, who is getting rich on all the millions spent to lower CO2 emissions? Follow the money, folks.

    BTW - wt… - take a spelling class!

     •  Reply
  7. Avatar2
    PoppaBob Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Tom Toles - how about taking up a REAL issue, like all the OHB campaign issues that are unfulfilled? Or non-job creation? Or the disintegration of family values?

    News item - it was reported today that rape is “down” due to DNA testing. So, how long will it take for the ACLU to ban DNA testing on the basis of “privacy”???

     •  Reply
  8. Kiss
    eft  over 14 years ago

    pb - so your issue with this cartoon about global warming is that it doesn’t mention rape?

     •  Reply
  9. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 14 years ago

    Toles is one of the best cartoonists today, poppabob, and he hits a lot of topics. Do your own if you feel the need. As for “dihydrogen monoxide,” yes, indeed, that contributes to the Greenhouse Effect. This is one reason that the melting Arctic and Antarctic icecaps is such a concern. Ice reflects light and heat back into space. Liquid water absorbs heat. One of the many “tipping points” people are looking at is how much faster warming takes place when we lose more of the icecap.

     •  Reply
  10. New bitmap image
    NoFearPup  over 14 years ago

    What are you going to do about it, Motey? Live in a cave? It’ll happen anyway. Now, pollution_ - that is another matter entirely. Or is carbon your way to fool the rubes into backing your mandates? Just admit it and then we can talk about redistribution of wealth and power. Is that what Libs want? Why lie about it? It just turns into powerless presidential terms when you’re caught in a lie (for Dems). Better yet - fire Emanuel before it’s all lost (for the Dems).

     •  Reply
  11. New bitmap image
    NoFearPup  over 14 years ago

    HQ, what’s your opinion of declining small reptile populations?

     •  Reply
  12. Ys
    HabaneroBuck  over 14 years ago

    What is “Climate Denial”? Since Global Warming is no longer the buzzword (or the observed data), we just generally throw out something about the “climate”? It is getting impenetrable anymore trying to decipher what the elites actually want us to believe about what man is doing to the climate, other than that we need to reduce emissions, i.e. cut back on Western Civilization.

    wtf, interesting points about Carter’s inheritances, but you deny human nature and experience if you think that raising the taxes on the rich will ultimately have a positive effect on the economy for the poor man. The economy was bad through four years of Carter and well into Reagan’s presidency. Can’t blame Nixon for that long of a streak, sorry. It always results in less activity in the marketplace…you just have to pick your poison, and history shows that when you fatten the gov over individuals, people become more reliant on the gov, which equals less freedom.

     •  Reply
  13. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 14 years ago

    Pup (“manna and quail?”) - Funny - we can end a war, cure diseases, improve the world – but we can’t battle global warming? No, it isn’t going to just “happen anyway,” that’s the whole point. We’ve contributed to global climate change. Therefore, we can contribute to changing it. And pollution is one of the things we can address, too, while we’re at it, since some kinds of pollution make it worse, too. Quit calling me a liar, you twit. I’m not lying, I’m citing evidence. I have no interest in redistributing power or wealth. Frankly, what I am more interested in is building up everyone’s wealth. Currently it is flowing from the poor to the rich. But you’d call that “earning.”

     •  Reply
  14. New bitmap image
    NoFearPup  over 14 years ago

    ^I’m sorry Princess Pea…Amphibian…is that the term?

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    jimmywfl  over 14 years ago

    Actually, it is getting colder. The Artic sea ice GREW for the last two years. The article headline of this twists it backwards “Artic sea ice at third lowest…” Shows you how they are manipulating the data. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6203411/Arctic-sea-ice-at-third-lowest-level.html

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    mustbeunique2  over 14 years ago

    Death to Taxes!!!!

    I vote we start a movement to get rid of every vehicle and start riding bikes!!!!

    And stop replacing Facts for science.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Magnaut  over 14 years ago

    this is all about AlGore getting rich…….he one the PEAS prize and is finnaly in the right pod with arafat and carter…..they don’t deserve capital letters

     •  Reply
  18. New bitmap image
    NoFearPup  over 14 years ago

    ~ ^ Shows the quality of debate with Libs. Name calling, arrogance, etc.

     •  Reply
  19. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member over 14 years ago

    ”~ ^ Shows the quality of debate with Libs. Name calling, arrogance, etc”

    Which is the kettle and which is the pot here?

     •  Reply
  20. Reagan ears
    d_legendary1  over 14 years ago

    HQ and and mutt are forgetting two things when it comes to fair tax: corporations have special tax breaks. So they won’t be paying the “fair tax” that you guys are clamoring for. Also rich guys won’t be paying that income tax anyway. Their income comes from capital gains, which can be anywhere from 0% to 15%. The only thing that fair tax is going to do is kill off social security and medicare.

    Oh wait…that’s what you guys want. My bad. YEAH! FAIR TAX (smirk).

     •  Reply
  21. New bitmap image
    NoFearPup  over 14 years ago

    Well, get it done already - you have your votes… Oh, wait-a-minit, you do have your votes, don’t you? Did you go and lose your votes again…or maybe you never had them?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Tom Toles