Mother Goose and Grimm by Mike Peters for January 03, 2024

  1. Missing large
    momofalex7  5 months ago

    In the prime of his life.

     •  Reply
  2. 16914740417144785387296898810443
    jasonsnakelover  5 months ago

    One time I was 41 years old.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Doug K  5 months ago

    Even when talking to a baby, talking baby talk isn’t so much for the baby’s benefit, it’s for the “adults” using it.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Doug K  5 months ago

    I thought at first that Mother Goose might be inebriated.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    purepaul  5 months ago

    Tried to figure out my age in dog years and it left me wanting to go back to bed.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    duggersd Premium Member 5 months ago

    He does not look a day over 350 years!

     •  Reply
  7. Dscf0051
    sarahbowl1 Premium Member 5 months ago

    Yeah, Mom! But I do the same to my dog, and she’s 35 human years!

     •  Reply
  8. 250
    ladykat  5 months ago

    I would have thought Grimm was older than that in human years.

     •  Reply
  9. Cave cat
    CaveCat87  5 months ago

    If Calvin tried to use dog years as an excuse for his age under the claims that he doesn’t need to go to school, his parents still won’t believe him in that regard.

     •  Reply
  10. 1017207 10200214106421862 492754112 n
    Cameron1988 Premium Member 5 months ago

    At least he will be in October

     •  Reply
  11. 1968d0a4 637e 4030 90bd e88b8da5572d
    darcyandsimon  5 months ago

    Grim just doesn’t seem like the kind of dog you’d use baby talk on. And actually, while I do modulate my voice, I don’t use that kind of talk with my kitty at all. “Is him awake?” What kind of grammar IS that?!

     •  Reply
  12. Img 1610
    WCraft Premium Member 5 months ago

    Everyone knows dogs only understand baby talk!

     •  Reply
  13. Freedom
    bookworm0812  5 months ago

    You mean I’m STILL older than him?!?!?!?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment