Is this cause and effect? Maybe. Is it DIRECT? Probably not.
Growing up in a family that cares, reads, discusses and critiques… and attending a good school with similar qualities is both expensive AND a good way to learn how to write a killer essay. University admission committees aren’t perfect, but they do appreciate good academic-quality work
State run colleges should have a blind application process. No information except names, grades and goals. Private ones should just be upfront and admit that money talks. If Harvard said “If your family isn’t worth $250,000 a year don’t even apply” what would happen?
Because Universities need money. They’re like megachurches, selling degrees instead of absolution. They both use fear as motivators (you’ll never be a SCOTUS, you’ll rot in hell forever). Ivy League endowments:
Let’s put this in the “No $#!* Sherlock” file. How’s about we keep it that way instead of publicly subsidizing upper-middle class conspicuous consumption?
The head of colleges make so much money and it’s no wonder people can’t afford to get an education…draining people of their savings just for an education is sickening.
But if you are a celebrity, don’t dare try to pay to get your kid in. The universities only turned them in was to distract from all the bribes they take yearly. They knew it would get a lot of publicity and take the heat off all the others.
It’s an interesting study. But the reasons the +$600k crowd’s kids are at an advantage is much more complex than courting donorship. $600k/yr ain’t funding any new academic building endowments. If you read the study, it’s more about the societal advantages conveyed up to and through the application process.
In Harvard’s defense, if you do get accepted but can not pay for it Harvard will use their endowment fund and give you a full scholarship. The money for which they get from those that pay the full freight.
It’s worse than that. You know the SAT? It’s supposed to predict an applicant’s success in his/her first year of college. But you know what correlates best with the SAT? No, not high school grades. Family wealth. Yup. Rich kids do better on the SAT. Why? Because they go to better schools and have better resources ALL THEIR LIVES.
Erse IS better 10 months ago
Is this cause and effect? Maybe. Is it DIRECT? Probably not.
Growing up in a family that cares, reads, discusses and critiques… and attending a good school with similar qualities is both expensive AND a good way to learn how to write a killer essay. University admission committees aren’t perfect, but they do appreciate good academic-quality work
GOGOPOWERANGERS 10 months ago
University will do whatever they need to survive
They are not government owned
GiantShetlandPony 10 months ago
Explains why so many with degrees from top universities aren’t much smarter than rocks.
DC Swamp 10 months ago
And students whose parents earn over $600 a year or more likely to drive nice cars and live in a nice house.
Havel 10 months ago
Although they preach the gospel of “meritocracy”, I suspect that many would not like the results if we truly had one.
Direwolf 10 months ago
State run colleges should have a blind application process. No information except names, grades and goals. Private ones should just be upfront and admit that money talks. If Harvard said “If your family isn’t worth $250,000 a year don’t even apply” what would happen?
Meg: All Seriousness Aside 10 months ago
Because Universities need money. They’re like megachurches, selling degrees instead of absolution. They both use fear as motivators (you’ll never be a SCOTUS, you’ll rot in hell forever). Ivy League endowments:
Brown $6.5 billion
Columbia $13.3 billion
Cornell $9.8 billion
Dartmouth $8.1 billion
Harvard $50.9 billion
Penn$20.7 billion
Princeton $35.8 billion
Yale $42.3 billion
SusanMontgomery2 10 months ago
Let’s put this in the “No $#!* Sherlock” file. How’s about we keep it that way instead of publicly subsidizing upper-middle class conspicuous consumption?
Zebrastripes 10 months ago
The head of colleges make so much money and it’s no wonder people can’t afford to get an education…draining people of their savings just for an education is sickening.
Raging Moderate 10 months ago
Now, take on college athletics..
NeedaChuckle Premium Member 10 months ago
But if you are a celebrity, don’t dare try to pay to get your kid in. The universities only turned them in was to distract from all the bribes they take yearly. They knew it would get a lot of publicity and take the heat off all the others.
Alberta Oil Premium Member 10 months ago
Isn’t that how trump got in?
GaryCooper 10 months ago
Yes.
Henwood 10 months ago
I would be a lot more worried if all students with worse grades but more money get in leaving those with no money and better grades without a chance.
BeniHanna6 Premium Member 10 months ago
About the truth of elite schools.
von71 10 months ago
It’s an interesting study. But the reasons the +$600k crowd’s kids are at an advantage is much more complex than courting donorship. $600k/yr ain’t funding any new academic building endowments. If you read the study, it’s more about the societal advantages conveyed up to and through the application process.
ncorgbl 10 months ago
Those who earn less than $600,000 per year likely can’t afford the tuition and housing costs. That’s what comes with ‘for profit’ schools.
Teto85 Premium Member 10 months ago
Yeah, so?
Free Radical 10 months ago
and a $2.2M GPA totally helps
Arghhgarrr Premium Member 10 months ago
In Harvard’s defense, if you do get accepted but can not pay for it Harvard will use their endowment fund and give you a full scholarship. The money for which they get from those that pay the full freight.
Rich Douglas 10 months ago
It’s worse than that. You know the SAT? It’s supposed to predict an applicant’s success in his/her first year of college. But you know what correlates best with the SAT? No, not high school grades. Family wealth. Yup. Rich kids do better on the SAT. Why? Because they go to better schools and have better resources ALL THEIR LIVES.