Ted Rall for August 08, 2022

  1. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member over 1 year ago

    If you didn’t have republicans who obstruct any social support in the U.S… Oh right, they only support tax breaks for the rich.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    egadi'mnotclad  over 1 year ago

    The rich and powerful couldn’t care less about the 99%. Machines and AI can replace us, they think we are superfluous.

     •  Reply
  3. Question 63916 960 720
    knutdl  over 1 year ago

    https://www.coalitionforthehomeless.org/proven-solutions/

     •  Reply
  4. Zh7uxue
    GreggW Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Empire before welfare.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Michael Spony Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Mr Rall I understand your point although I think your comparison is illogical, but since you made that comparison I’ll ask you what are your ideas/suggestions on what actions the US should take visa vie Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine?

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Denver Reader Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Your $10B seems low. Moreover, there are endemic problems to homelessness that money can’t solve. That said, $10B would go a long way towards helping and would significantly reduce it.

     •  Reply
  7. Menard2
    habfan40  over 1 year ago

    They always say things like that, It will only cost x billion to fix this , but when they get that x billion to run the program, the costs skyrocket to 10’s of X and the proplem is not fixed, bringing on demands for more money,

     •  Reply
  8. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Sufficient affordable housing, medical care, and food. Never enough for them while hundreds of billions are squandered on the military among other boondoggles.

     •  Reply
  9. Dr coathanger abortions 150
    Teto85 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    We could eliminate homelessness AND cover food stamps if we were to tax the churches. But Ted would rather toot his horn for Putin.

     •  Reply
  10. Screenshot 2023 12 10 091315
    Stephen Runnels Premium Member over 1 year ago

    And when voters purge right-wing Schadenfreude from Congress, those plans for eliminating homelessness will become a reality.

     •  Reply
  11. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  over 1 year ago

    I always said take care of home first….but then there’s this diplomacy thingy and Allie’s, etc….SIGH!

     •  Reply
  12. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  over 1 year ago

    Just think how many millions the Govt could save should the GOP stop wasting tax dollars investigating irrelevant issues 20 times just to stall obstruct and deceive!

    To date none of these so-called investigations have turned up zilch,nada, nothing! And speaking of wasting our money…. PORK spending is out of control..

     •  Reply
  13. Homoerectus
    fusilier  over 1 year ago

    I’d like to see just how much effect outfits like “Offerpad” or “BenBuysHouses” have on homelessness.

    Here in Indianapolis, there are several Section 8 apartment complexes that are plain, old-fashioned slums, because the owners are anonymous, out-of-state organizations that collect rent but don’t pay utilities or do any maintenance.

    FYI, Indiana laws are set up by decades of corporatist Republican legislatures to protect said organizations.

    fusilier

    James 2:24

     •  Reply
  14. Img 0402
    alb7668 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    A simple observation, painfully clear, causing the usual shallow rationalizations and baseless character assassination. Missing the “whataboutisms” however…

     •  Reply
  15. Sevasleeping
    Serial Pedant  over 1 year ago

    I am trying to imagine a scenario that depicts republicans voting for a a bill to aid the homeless…nope. Get real, Rall.

     •  Reply
  16. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member over 1 year ago

    There is not enough money in the world to stop/eliminate homelessness. And.. for the most part, those advocating for more money.. only want a piece of the pie.

     •  Reply
  17. Pine marten3
    martens  over 1 year ago

    The Finns are unique in being a nation in which homelessness is declining. They have a program, Homes First, that is quite effective/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_Finland

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    piper_gilbert  over 1 year ago

    I hate either/or choices to slam one policy over another. Why can’t we do both? Help Ukraine and attack homelessness.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    wheaters  over 1 year ago

    Charity begins at home. Sort out homelessness first.

     •  Reply
  20. Minifig2
    Aliquid  over 1 year ago

    It would cost more than that to end homelessness. And moreover, no amount of money will make the problem go away, it would require major cultural, governmental and economic system changes.

     •  Reply
  21. A williams spt  1
    guyjen2004 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    I’ve worked with and for homeless organizations for many years. There are models for success that work well with a certain portion of the homeless population. Previously stable families who are not also burdened with serious substance abuse and/or mental health challenges are fixable. Some veteran’s groups have had good success but they are few and far between. I’ve volunteered for one of them for more than 20 years. But again, if the substance abuse is too deep, the success rate goes down dramatically. Same with mental health. The success rate with a vet who has some mental health issues and maybe alcoholism is pretty high, at least for the more successful homeless vet groups. But the bulk of those people on the streets in SF, NYC, Seattle, Nashville, Houston, and any other major city are heavily into drugs, have serious mental health problems, have criminal tendencies and are so far removed from anything resembling a life within normal society that they are beyond saving or simply content with the life they have. Hard truths.

     •  Reply
  22. Xp patch jpeg crop
    jack666 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    And so we get the latest installment of Mr. Rall’s inexplicable campaign to defend and/or minimize Putin’s insane campaign of mass destruction, mass murder, mass enslavement and mass rape. Why?

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    rlaker22j  over 1 year ago

    there will always be homeless people and they will always be poor people

     •  Reply
  24. Bob 1
    moondog42 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    If we just need to send $60 billion worth of anything over there, Michael Bloomberg is worth that much. Just sayin’…. We could get rid of him AND fulfill the contractual amount at the same time.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member over 1 year ago

    We cannot stand by and watch as Russia rapes Ukraine. We could, but we could no longer call ourselves America.

     •  Reply
  26. Picture
    SammySnyder  over 1 year ago

    I’m confused, is Ted suggesting that the solution to homelessness is the same as Planned Parenthood’s solution to unwanted children?

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    jvscanlan Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Ted wants Donald Trump back in the White House

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    skipugh Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Sorry, $10 billion wouldn’t solve homelessness. It would help some; but, the real issues are lack of education, addictions, mental illness.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    Arghhgarrr Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Actually much of the $60 billion (earmarked but not yet all spent) will go to American arms makers so charity still starts at home.

     •  Reply
  30. Animals being weird
    wildthing  over 1 year ago

    The poor have no voice, the dead even less.

     •  Reply
  31. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 1 year ago

    The Environmental and Energy Study Institute found that the US government alone spends $20 billion every year on direct fossil fuel subsidies. Of that figure, around $16 billion goes towards oil and gas, while the remaining $4 billion benefits the coal industry.

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    Rich Douglas  over 1 year ago

    What is it about Russians waging war that is difficult to understand?

    Also, this isn’t a binary choice. The $10B you refer to isn’t coming anyway. This is America, remember? Everything we get, we deserve. Everything someone else gets is a giveaway to the unworthy.

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    apfelzra Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Unless Mr. Rall thinks inflation is much higher than it is, or will be, the USA has NOT sent $60 billion to Ukraine. And there is no reason why we cannot fight Putin’s atrocious invasion and help our homeless population at the same time.

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    Trytofocus  over 1 year ago

    More and more folks are really hearing this. Thanks, Ted. Instead of another aircraft carrier, or a weapons system that doesn’t work but took a half trillion dollars to develop, let’s fix some stuff.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Ted Rall