He may be waiting until Ketanji Brown Jackson gets some experience on the DC Court, so she can replace him. I’m still disappointed in his vote in UT vs Strieff in which he allowed crooked cops to harass citizens with illegal stop and frisks. Justice Uncle Thomas again stretched the nonsense from the Nixon-Burger Court that the exclusionary rule only deters police misconduct, instead of being the individual right against unreasonable search and seizures.
It probably makes me a bad person. But if he doesn’t retire during Biden’s presidency (preferably while Democrats have congress), I think he should be excoriated. A good legacy isn’t just about what you do during your time…part of your legacy is preparing for when you aren’t going to be around anymore.
Best idea I’ve heard is the current number of justices (9) with 18-year terms, each expiring in an odd-numbered year, so each president would get 2 appointments per term. How to get from here to there? Starting in 2023, retire the longest-tenured one each time a new appointee is due.
Not going to lie, it feels kind of selfish to remain on the bench at such an age hoping a Democratic controlled WH and Senate will be in control when one’s age finally catches up with them. Instead that level of arrogance has led to a 6-3 Conservative SCOTUS that could become 7-2 if McConnell gets his way in 2022 and 2024.
Concretionist almost 3 years ago
You can see why.
Terdarian almost 3 years ago
Sometime in the next 16 months would be fine. So, then we can have 5 new justices.
PraiseofFolly almost 3 years ago
Is it bad for me to think that the admirable Justice Ginsburg should have chosen to retire well within Obama’s term of office?
Patjade almost 3 years ago
We don’t need another RGB or Merrick Garland in 2022.
baroden Premium Member almost 3 years ago
We could always expand the court
scote1379 Premium Member almost 3 years ago
All in good time ( soon I hope )
bbbmorrell almost 3 years ago
What is the man waiting for?!
VegaAlopex almost 3 years ago
He may be waiting until Ketanji Brown Jackson gets some experience on the DC Court, so she can replace him. I’m still disappointed in his vote in UT vs Strieff in which he allowed crooked cops to harass citizens with illegal stop and frisks. Justice Uncle Thomas again stretched the nonsense from the Nixon-Burger Court that the exclusionary rule only deters police misconduct, instead of being the individual right against unreasonable search and seizures.
StackableContainers almost 3 years ago
It probably makes me a bad person. But if he doesn’t retire during Biden’s presidency (preferably while Democrats have congress), I think he should be excoriated. A good legacy isn’t just about what you do during your time…part of your legacy is preparing for when you aren’t going to be around anymore.
Michael G. almost 3 years ago
May a baby be named for him. Soon.
codak almost 3 years ago
appointments for SC should have a random element . . .as they kind of did under the articles of confederation. . .it needs to be less partisan
Richard S Russell Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Best idea I’ve heard is the current number of justices (9) with 18-year terms, each expiring in an odd-numbered year, so each president would get 2 appointments per term. How to get from here to there? Starting in 2023, retire the longest-tenured one each time a new appointee is due.
Richard S Russell Premium Member almost 3 years ago
FWIW, religious affiliation of the Supremes: 7 Catholics, 2 Jews, 0 Protestants, 0 Muslims, 0 Hindus, 0 Buddhists, 0 Confucians, 0 Mormons, 0 Sikhs, 0 pantheists, and (big surprise) 0 atheists.
ndblackirish97 almost 3 years ago
Not going to lie, it feels kind of selfish to remain on the bench at such an age hoping a Democratic controlled WH and Senate will be in control when one’s age finally catches up with them. Instead that level of arrogance has led to a 6-3 Conservative SCOTUS that could become 7-2 if McConnell gets his way in 2022 and 2024.
jvscanlan Premium Member almost 3 years ago
It’ll be interesting to find out exactly what Trump blackmailed Kennedy with . . . Kennedy never would have done a favor for the Dear Leader