If Democrats waited to allow all the subpoenas to work their way thru the courts, Ramirez would have a cartoon whining about impeachment in the middle of an election.
So let me lay out an analogy (which is a poor way to reason, and thus may actually change a few minds, maybe): A president who is a danger to the nation and the world is like an arsonist with a torch. Should we let this arsonist commit even more crimes, light even more fires while we argue among ourselves whether the fires already lit are actually arson, or maybe just the result of his efforts to remove structures that some see as being harmful to their efforts to become ever more wealthy? Or should we “rush to judgment” and make an effort to prevent even more criminal behavior? Remember, he’s still got that lit torch…
I’d love to comment, but I’m a pilot and I have to go. I’m taking Bill Clinton back (for the 25th time) to Jeffery Epstein’s “Pervert Island”, so he can leave a few more stains on some 13 year olds clothes.
Without that Dress the history of America would have been a lot different Hillary would have already finished Her two terms Barry would be running for his second . The lies would have worked Monica would have hung Herself 20 years ago. No harm no foul ?
Retired engineer over 4 years ago
When the evidence is obvious and clear cut, why wait?
DonnyTwoScoops over 4 years ago
If Democrats waited to allow all the subpoenas to work their way thru the courts, Ramirez would have a cartoon whining about impeachment in the middle of an election.
martens over 4 years ago
Meh.
DrDon1 over 4 years ago
Like the rest of the GOP, Ramirez is not about to defend our Constitution!
walfishj over 4 years ago
The SCOTUS has determined that denial of a swift trial is a denial of justice.
Scoutmaster77 over 4 years ago
A cheap hit at a woman. Now that’s real class.
DeepState over 4 years ago
What rush? This is been brewing for years.
Concretionist over 4 years ago
So let me lay out an analogy (which is a poor way to reason, and thus may actually change a few minds, maybe): A president who is a danger to the nation and the world is like an arsonist with a torch. Should we let this arsonist commit even more crimes, light even more fires while we argue among ourselves whether the fires already lit are actually arson, or maybe just the result of his efforts to remove structures that some see as being harmful to their efforts to become ever more wealthy? Or should we “rush to judgment” and make an effort to prevent even more criminal behavior? Remember, he’s still got that lit torch…
Radish the wordsmith over 4 years ago
It took Republicans years to come up with that.
Sex between consenting adults is legal.
All Republicans do is whine about the current proceedings.
And its about Trump’s subversion of the Constitution against all Americans.
And the Russian loving Republicans and Fox are defending this fraud.
FJB Premium Member over 4 years ago
I’d love to comment, but I’m a pilot and I have to go. I’m taking Bill Clinton back (for the 25th time) to Jeffery Epstein’s “Pervert Island”, so he can leave a few more stains on some 13 year olds clothes.
Ammo is on a break Premium Member over 4 years ago
Without that Dress the history of America would have been a lot different Hillary would have already finished Her two terms Barry would be running for his second . The lies would have worked Monica would have hung Herself 20 years ago. No harm no foul ?
randolini Premium Member over 4 years ago
Perhaps the right will remember the next time that "Whatever goes around, comes around.